http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22403
--- Comment #15 from Juan Lang juan_lang@yahoo.com 2010-04-21 11:12:54 --- (In reply to comment #14)
I tried both, but I think I tried the binary distribution first. I'm wondering if it was not installed properly before I compiled from source (which I did using macports as per http://davidbaumgold.com/tutorials/wine-mac/ ).
Can you please advise, if those instructions for compiling via macports are good?
I had a look, and they look good to me. It installs the wine-devel package, which has version 1.1.42 of Wine (which is what you reported, good.) In general we prefer referring to our own wiki, as it has a chance of being updated, whereas even though directions on an external site may be correct at one point in time, they quickly become out of date. Sadly, our wiki pages could be a little clearer, and as of today, I think the page you cited is a better reference.