http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31990
François Gouget [email protected] changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |[email protected] Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from François Gouget [email protected] 2012-10-18 09:12:10 CDT --- See also this discussion thread on wine-devel: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2012-October/097396.html
To summarize from the discussion thread: * As pointed out, proper conformance tests should embed any extra file they need in the resource file: http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2012-October/097435.html
* So this would be for running one-off tests on the TestBot in which case doing it the proper way may be more trouble than it's worth.
* The SFX approach should be investigated. If it can be done without modifying WineTestBot then that would probably be the best solution and it should be documented somewhere on the Wiki. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2012-October/097406.html
* If the WineTestBot needs to be modified, then having it accept regular zip files in addition to regular executables would probably be the easiest to use solution. http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2012-October/097428.html