https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32515
--- Comment #43 from Sebastian Lackner sebastian@fds-team.de --- Hi Christian,
my idea was similar, i thought its probably the zero serial-number (returned by the same function) that confuses the copy-protection. I didn't have time to test this yet, and moreover I think the problem with crashing applications was way more problematic. Does this other issue have a separate bug report now?
Regards, Sebastian