2 Dec
2010
2 Dec
'10
2:48 p.m.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25164
--- Comment #10 from Jörg Höhle hoehle@users.sourceforge.net 2010-12-02 08:48:10 CST --- Your logs show that v1.9 fixed invalid memory accesses, thus I recommend you don't use v1.0 any more. (This does not prove that v1.0 has a memory bug, it might have triggered something in Wine).
it _doesn't_ behave correctly
Now I'm confused. Is v1.9 subject to the regression you mentioned? Is there any regression with it? Do the symptoms you describe in your original comment #0 still apply?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.