http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35561
--- Comment #4 from Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net --- Hello Alan,
--- quote --- I assume you got this bad APC result because you didn't try the "Hackish patch to fix APC problem" referred to above. --- quote ---
I don't need to try it because I know what it does (putting the main thread as early as possible in alertable wait state, allowing the queued APC to run).
The patch is correctly dubbed as 'hack' and is unlikely to be included in mainline as-is.
--- quote --- Do you confirm the further MSYS2 mintty issue I found (where strace.log does not mention apc) when that Wine patch is applied? --- quote ---
No, I thought this bug was about the missing user APC execution. I basically misread the whole comment and interpreted things like "you have to apply patch 'foo'", buried within the comment text as actual issue reported here.
Since this bug is now more or less about _two_ issues it might be better to split this up into two bugs. One for the missing user APC execution and another for the issue following (having dependency to APC bug).
Regards