https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
--- Comment #16 from reserv0@yahoo.com --- (In reply to joaopa from comment #15)
Thats not the way of working of wine.
If a patch introduces a regression, then the patch needs to be improved with a new patch. Not reverting and losing the thing it fixed.
LOL !
No surprise Wine needs decades to mature to something barely usable then.
It is a *basic rule* in programming to revert ANY change (or putative "fix") causing a regression, UNTIL a better change/fix that is not causing that regression is found.
As it is, you are basically condemning Wine users to live with tons of bugs that "do not break tons of feature" but nonetheless render Wine useless for their specific usage...
Totally illogical!