http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16286
Summary: amstream, quartz, devenum: some cinematics do not work with builtin dlls Product: Wine Version: 1.1.9 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: amlopezalonso@gmail.com
After doing some experiments I found that some cinematics only work with native amstream, quartz and devenum dlls. Please check duplicated bug 16250 and bug 8712 for details.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16286
Antonio López amlopezalonso@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |titan.costa@wanadoo.fr
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16286
--- Comment #1 from Antonio López amlopezalonso@gmail.com 2008-11-30 10:46:34 --- *** Bug 16250 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16286
--- Comment #2 from joaopa jeremielapuree@yahoo.fr 2008-11-30 12:07:41 --- When you fill a bug report, please attach a console output.
Joaopa
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16286
--- Comment #3 from Antonio López amlopezalonso@gmail.com 2008-11-30 13:37:32 --- Created an attachment (id=17570) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=17570) Sacred log using builtin dlls: cinematics not working
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16286
--- Comment #4 from Antonio López amlopezalonso@gmail.com 2008-11-30 13:38:44 --- Sorry. I thought it was not necessary as I already did it in bug 16250. Anyway, here we go...
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16286
--- Comment #5 from Antonio López amlopezalonso@gmail.com 2008-11-30 13:40:01 --- Created an attachment (id=17571) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=17571) Sacred cinematics working with native amstream, quartz and devenum dlls.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16286
Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #6 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2008-11-30 15:12:20 --- DO NOT create metabugs.
Closing.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16286
Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #7 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2008-11-30 15:12:53 --- Closing.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16286
--- Comment #8 from Christian Costa titan.costa@wanadoo.fr 2008-11-30 16:05:39 --- The intention was to create a metabug or at least a sort of. The reason was that amstream is mostly stub. It could have been closed when there is a minimal implementation that can be tested. Is there any policies or rules about metabugs ?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16286
Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|major |normal
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16286
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2008-12-03 00:49:14 --- It's been decided that metabugs are not useful for Wine bugzilla, and they create addtional burden and mess which is not really worth the trouble of maintaining. Each bug report should be devoted to a particular, simple bug.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16286
--- Comment #10 from Christian Costa titan.costa@wanadoo.fr 2008-12-04 14:27:09 --- Ok. Thanks for the explanation.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16286
--- Comment #11 from Antonio López amlopezalonso@gmail.com 2008-12-04 16:58:31 --- Understood. Sorry for the mess.