https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Bug ID: 40397 Summary: unimplemented function sfc.dll.SRSetRestorePoint Product: Wine Version: 1.9.6 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org Reporter: super_man@post.com Distribution: ---
http://games.softpedia.com/get/Games-Demo/Warhammer--Mark-of-Chaos-Battle-Ma...
The installer crashes at the very end during dx install.
Calling function SRSetRestorePoint.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa378941%28v=vs.85%...
I was about to try if bug 13470 can be tested with this demo.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
super_man@post.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://games.softpedia.com/ | |get/Games-Demo/Warhammer--M | |ark-of-Chaos-Battle-March-D | |emo.shtml Keywords| |download Distribution|--- |Mint
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|unimplemented function |Warhammer: Mark of Chaos - |sfc.dll.SRSetRestorePoint |Battle March Demo needs | |unimplemented function | |sfc.dll.SRSetRestorePoint CC| |austinenglish@gmail.com
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
--- Comment #3 from Bruno Jesus 00cpxxx@gmail.com --- As far as I remember when a new DLL is added we don't consider that a regression when new functions from it are required, but that is just me and my love for bureaucracy.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wylda@volny.cz
--- Comment #1 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- *** Bug 40410 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch, regression Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Regression SHA1| |f34fd257c6c83804075914ee2b8 | |2cc42eadc683f Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- Confirming.
Patch sent https://source.winehq.org/patches/data/120943
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
--- Comment #4 from Henri Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com --- (In reply to Bruno Jesus from comment #3)
As far as I remember when a new DLL is added we don't consider that a regression when new functions from it are required, but that is just me and my love for bureaucracy.
Yeah, otherwise if you apply it consistently almost any bug or unimplemented feature in that dll ends up being marked as a regression.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
--- Comment #5 from Wylda wylda@volny.cz ---
Rule of thumb for me as a _user_, whenever i have to use the regression test and it's results are valid, it's a regression.
But i understand, that developers have other point of view as they know the internals ;) Anyway, it's nearly fixed by Austin already.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
--- Comment #6 from Henri Verbeet hverbeet@gmail.com --- (In reply to Wylda from comment #5)
Rule of thumb for me as a _user_, whenever i have to use the regression test and it's results are valid, it's a regression.
I don't disagree with that, but that doesn't necessarily mean it also makes sense to apply the regression keyword to all of those.
E.g. it's not uncommon for games to have both a d3d9 and d3d11 renderer. If you apply the regression keyword to every single one that starts trying to use d3d11 once the dll is introduced as a regression until it works just as well as the d3d9 renderer that mostly just adds noise.
Perhaps it makes sense to introduce a separate keyword to track these, but I'm not sure how much of a demand there would be for such a thing.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Fixed by SHA1| |89eb67dbc8c6a7dc93fd76e2ad3 | |ac1e4266f1f67 Keywords|patch, regression | Regression SHA1|f34fd257c6c83804075914ee2b8 | |2cc42eadc683f | Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #7 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- Fixed by https://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commitdiff/89eb67dbc8c6a7dc93fd76e2ad...
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
--- Comment #8 from Wylda wylda@volny.cz --- (In reply to Henri Verbeet from comment #6)
Yes, you are right. IMHO the best thing is leave it as is. Users won't diagnose that precisely, they do their best based on their knowledge. At the end, bugzilla is a tool for developers, not users and as such, developer always can remove that keyword as they know better.
Bruno's bureaucracy taste ;c) or another keyword would lead to also fixing bugzilla's description other than current "bugs relating to programs that were working at one time but stoped working for some reason". It's easier to remove that keyword...
patch got in :) Thank you Austin.
http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commitdiff/89eb67dbc8c6a7dc93fd76e2ad3...
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Sebastian Lackner sebastian@fds-team.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |linuxdonald@posteo.de
--- Comment #9 from Sebastian Lackner sebastian@fds-team.de --- *** Bug 40419 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Bruno Jesus 00cpxxx@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |epistemepromeneur@free.fr
--- Comment #10 from Bruno Jesus 00cpxxx@gmail.com --- *** Bug 40434 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Józef Kucia joseph.kucia@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |levanchelidze@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from Józef Kucia joseph.kucia@gmail.com --- *** Bug 40452 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |winehq@iooioio.orion.ubersp | |ace.de
--- Comment #12 from Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com --- *** Bug 40467 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #13 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org --- Closing bugs fixed in 1.9.8.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |1.8.x CC| |mstefani@redhat.com
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Wylda wylda@volny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |volker.persch@t-online.de
--- Comment #14 from Wylda wylda@volny.cz --- *** Bug 40486 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Josh winehq@iooioio.orion.uberspace.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|winehq@iooioio.orion.ubersp | |ace.de |
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Bruno Jesus 00cpxxx@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |berillions@gmail.com
--- Comment #15 from Bruno Jesus 00cpxxx@gmail.com --- *** Bug 40521 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
--- Comment #16 from Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.com --- Remove 1.8.x target milestone from bugs that didn't make it into 1.8.x for one reason or another. This are all included in the stable 2.0 release.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|1.8.x |---
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40397
Józef Kucia joseph.kucia@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ricgonal@gmail.com
--- Comment #17 from Józef Kucia joseph.kucia@gmail.com --- *** Bug 42855 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org