http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Summary: Wine developers prefer beer Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: wine-bugs@cboltz.de
Marcus Meissner told me at the openSUSE conference last october that most wine developers actually prefer beer. He also repeated this statement in the slides for today's "wine is not (only) an emulator" talk he's giving at LinuxTag together with me.
It must be a bug that wine developers prefer beer!
Proposed fix:
for person in developers/* ; do sed -i 's/Prefer: beer/Prefer: wine/' done
;-))
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |austinenglish@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2011-05-14 12:18:32 CDT --- Confirming, though I have a feeling this may be a WONTFIX. :p
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |focht@gmx.net
--- Comment #2 from Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net 2011-05-14 13:29:46 CDT --- Hello,
it seems the 'alcohol' component is missing in bugzilla.
Please provide WINEDEBUG=+water,+barley,+hops,+yeast trace for review.
Though I don't see a benefit fixing this bug as drinking at work seems to lead to more honest communications and reduces complaints about low pay ;-)
Regards
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
fracting fracting@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fracting@gmail.com
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Christian Boltz wine-bugs@cboltz.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Christian Boltz wine-bugs@cboltz.de 2011-05-15 11:08:44 CDT --- *** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Christian Boltz wine-bugs@cboltz.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mm-meissner@gmx.de
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Erich Hoover ehoover@mines.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ehoover@mines.edu
--- Comment #4 from Erich Hoover ehoover@mines.edu 2011-05-15 18:15:23 CDT --- I prefer Wine, but I doubt we actually have any statistically relevant data on this issue...
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Jeff Zaroyko jeffz@jeffz.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeffz@jeffz.name
--- Comment #5 from Jeff Zaroyko jeffz@jeffz.name 2011-05-15 19:51:57 CDT --- I prefer wine too.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Marcus Meissner marcus@jet.franken.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marcus@jet.franken.de
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
--- Comment #6 from Marcel Meißner mm-meissner@gmx.de 2011-05-16 13:51:04 CDT --- I really wonder how I ended up in the CC for this bug.
Anyways, I guess this bug is dependant on the sort of wine/beer involved, can anyone provide a testcase that reproduces the issue?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
--- Comment #7 from Marcus Meissner marcus@jet.franken.de 2011-05-16 16:46:27 CDT --- Marcel, I guess someone thought you are me ;)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
--- Comment #8 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2011-05-27 14:21:51 CDT --- No love for whisk(e)y? :)
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
André H. nerv@dawncrow.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nerv@dawncrow.de
--- Comment #9 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2011-07-11 17:20:12 CDT --- (In reply to comment #8)
No love for whisk(e)y? :)
I actually try to reverse engineer a bottle of Jack Daniels Single Barrel, but it's quite hard without opening the bottle.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
André H. nerv@dawncrow.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |integration
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dank@kegel.com
--- Comment #10 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2011-07-11 18:07:20 CDT --- I think the pre-wineconf dinner may be an adequate test environment, but I'm not sure what language one writes testcases for that in.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Erich Hoover ehoover@mines.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|ehoover@mines.edu |
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
--- Comment #11 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2013-02-07 09:10:47 CST --- Bug is still present as of FOSDEM2013 we even attended at the beer event, and it was great. They had very strong beer (up to 10%) so maybe that is falsifying the result.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
christopherwuy@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |christopherwuy@gmail.com
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Ken Sharp imwellcushtymelike@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|-unknown |www-unknown Product|Wine |WineHQ.org
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|www-unknown |-unknown Product|WineHQ.org |Wine
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
lilydjwg@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lilydjwg@gmail.com
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Bruno Jesus 00cpxxx@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |obfuscation, performance Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #12 from Bruno Jesus 00cpxxx@gmail.com --- Due to the lack of logs requested in comment 2 and lack of testcase requested in comment 6 I have to agree to comment 1 and say it is a tough decision but this bug is a WONTFIX.
Beer has been preferred in most situations related to development, more developers drink beer before testing bugs, during patch development and after patch rejection (source unknown). Sometimes patches are commited and even then more developers still drink beer. Notable exceptions were stated in comment 4 and comment 5 and comment 8.
Drinking increases integration but reduces performance and can be clearly related to several accidents that can lead to well known regressions (source unknown). It is pretty clear that beer was the cause that led to comment 5. For example comment 9 talks about reverse engineering, which is clearly forbidden, the developer is well aware of that and could only have posted that under ofbuscation of beer.
A whole new discussion could arise in order to understand if the problem is Wine or wine. But that should take another 6 years.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27162
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #13 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- Closing.
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org