http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
Bug #: 31973 Summary: Report option into WineHQ Product: WineHQ.org Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 URL: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=versi on&iId=3126 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: www-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: thunderstormpolska@o2.pl Classification: Unclassified
Maybe we need report (posting) option?
http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=3126
I mean @menujusukse post
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|Report option into WineHQ |AppDB admins need spam | |control tools Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net 2012-10-14 17:11:10 CDT --- Thanks for pointing out the spam post; I have deleted it.
I suspect the AppDB is going to become a more attractive target for spammers now that we can effectively keep them out of the forum. AppDB admins need comment moderation tools like the forum has, including the ability to ban spammers.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|www-unknown |appdb-unknown Product|WineHQ.org |WineHQ Apps Database
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |download, source CC| |kennybobs@o2.co.uk See Also| |http://bugs.winehq.org/show | |_bug.cgi?id=31859
--- Comment #2 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2012-12-24 07:35:56 CST --- This has already become a serious problem, exacerbated by bug 31859.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
Joel k00_fol@k.kth.se changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |k00_fol@k.kth.se
--- Comment #3 from Joel k00_fol@k.kth.se 2013-04-05 03:04:05 CDT --- I've found a few posts that say something like "Thanks for [application name or random word]. I really like it. [blog-looking url that leads to deleted blog] at [link to the blog service] I strongly suspect this is a spam because the user really made an effort to include the links, and the fact that the blog was deleted.
Could we put some easy guidelines to the users and also for reference when moderating? I'd like something that doesn't require us to check urls/blogs whatever. I might have agreed to something when I created it but I could not find it now (and I'm not making a new account just to find out).
I suggest something like: *Post only comments relevant to the execution (running) of this application *Do not include irrelevant URLs, or advertisements.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
--- Comment #4 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net 2013-04-05 08:21:06 CDT --- Moderators are free to add notes about what is appropriate to post, but spammers are not going to be stopped by that. They know they're spamming. They want to spam. The problem is that AppDB admins do not have the ability to ban accounts. We can delete spam when we find it, but cannot stop anyone from repeatedly posting it.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
--- Comment #5 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2013-04-05 12:44:54 CDT --- (In reply to comment #4)
The problem is that AppDB admins do not have the ability to ban accounts.
We used to though, but the link doesn't work anymore...
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |austinenglish@gmail.com
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
--- Comment #6 from Ken Sharp imwellcushtymelike@gmail.com 2013-10-04 14:09:11 CDT --- Four active spam users: http://appdb.winehq.org/contact.php?iRecipientId=290450 http://appdb.winehq.org/contact.php?iRecipientId=311260 http://appdb.winehq.org/contact.php?iRecipientId=311166 http://appdb.winehq.org/contact.php?iRecipientId=310341
Trying to delete these users still doesn't work.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
Jeremy Newman jnewman@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jnewman@codeweavers.com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Jeremy Newman jnewman@codeweavers.com --- As a first step, I am going to integrate the http://www.stopforumspam.com/ blacklist into the AppDB. This check will happen each time a post is submitted, if the IP or e-mail on the account is listed, the post will be denied.
After that I'll add some post limits in for new accounts. If your account is new, and you have < X posts (say 5), you are limited to 1 post a day. Once you hit 5 posts, you can freely post. Spammers will then at least have to wait 5 days with 5 posts until they can flood us.
Then, perhaps we can add some 'flag as spam' buttons for logged in users. So users can flag posts, and the admins can more easily clean them up.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
--- Comment #8 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- (In reply to Jeremy Newman from comment #7)
As a first step, I am going to integrate the http://www.stopforumspam.com/ blacklist into the AppDB. This check will happen each time a post is submitted, if the IP or e-mail on the account is listed, the post will be denied.
Just to verify, that couldn't easily be used on bugzilla, could it?
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
Jeremy Newman jnewman@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|wine-bugs@winehq.org |jnewman@codeweavers.com
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
Rob Hills rhills@medimorphosis.com.au changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhills@medimorphosis.com.au
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
--- Comment #9 from Rob Hills rhills@medimorphosis.com.au --- I've noticed this problem growing over the past few months. I would like to see at least a link that enables me to flag a comment as Spam to alert the administrators.
Ideally maintainers could be given the ability to moderate such flagged comments to reduce the workload on the system admin(s).
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
--- Comment #10 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net --- Maintainers already have the ability to delete spam; that's a key part of their responsibilities. Unfortunately, not all maintainers are doing their jobs.
If you see spam, first report it to the maintainer, and if he/she doesn't respond in a reasonable amount of time, report it on https://forum.winehq.org/viewforum.php?f=11.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31973
tokktokk fdsfgs@krutt.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fdsfgs@krutt.org
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org