http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6836
------- Additional Comments From mail@science.su 2006-07-12 21:22 -------
It doesn't have to look the same, but cutting off szOtherStuff is not acceptable. I also think it should attempt to provide copyright information from the program resources.
I agree that is cutting off szOtherStuff is bad and should be fixed but I think that displaying "Wine was bought to you by ..." list is nice idea. In fact it definitely doesn't say that depelopers of Wine created *this* application - it just say who developed Wine. Also please note that Wine's notepad and others Wine's standard programs also uses this about box. And I agree with Mike - it is good practice to create patches and then discuss them for such minor bugs if you really care about this. Of course I do not say that someone who created bug report *must* create patches to get bug fixed - this way simply faster for such trivial bugs.
In at least one case (original Notepad), there is no indication of the original copyright/authorship at all, and a careless read makes it seem like Wine wrote it!
If you managed to run original Notepad then you must know that it belongs to Windows. But in fact it is more Notepad's bug that it doesn't contain copyright information (real (not neccessary official) copyright owner is programmer(s) who wrote it and not Microsoft; in this case Microsoft is official copyright owner). Theoretically it is possible to determine that that this is Microsoft Notepad and display this within about box but someone must write patch for this. It would be nice of course and I agree that it is good if someone implement this but such implementation should be careful - it shouldn't display Microsoft's copyright within Wine's Notepad!
I think that only "real" bug is problem with szOtherStuff. Other problems discussed here isn't actually bugs - I think it is more correct to call them design solutions. What design is better is just someone's opinion and virtually all opinions that make any sense is "right" but only one can be actually used.