https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43702
Bug ID: 43702 Summary: No comments shown if no maintainers for app Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org Reporter: azrdev@qrdn.de Distribution: ---
If an app has no maintainers, it shows "comments disabled", and one cannot enter new comments. This is useful, because no one would moderate them.
However, it would still be useful to see the backlog of old comments, which may contain hints and workarounds posted by users (when there still were maintainers).
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43702
--- Comment #1 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- Some links to sample applications would be useful.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43702
--- Comment #2 from azrdev azrdev@qrdn.de --- dunno if there had been any comments previously, but randomly picking any app without maintainer yields https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=2
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43702
Joerg Schiermeier mywine@schiermeier-it.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mywine@schiermeier-it.de
--- Comment #3 from Joerg Schiermeier mywine@schiermeier-it.de --- If there are workarounds wine AppDB is a nice place to show how the application comes to life in wine. Maybe someone will add this as a hint in Bugzillas howto.
I recommend to close this bug as WONTFIX.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43702
--- Comment #4 from Joerg Schiermeier mywine@schiermeier-it.de ---
Maybe someone will add this as a hint in Bugzillas howto.
And also in the Maintainer guide.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43702
Ken Sharp imwellcushtymelike@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Ken Sharp imwellcushtymelike@gmail.com --- Confirming. And surprising.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43702
Stian Low wineryyyyy@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wineryyyyy@gmail.com
--- Comment #6 from Stian Low wineryyyyy@gmail.com --- (In reply to Ken Sharp from comment #5)
Confirming. And surprising.
The condition that controls this in it's current form was introduced by commit:
1868edfb61cda174f9c3a364ab1071d8ebf6a081 CommitDate: Tue May 30 14:30:12 2017 -0500
However, the conditional logic seems to have existed prior stretching back to the beginning of commits.
See the second commit for this merge request for the solution described there: https://gitlab.winehq.org/winehq/appdb/-/merge_requests/24
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43702
Ken Sharp imwellcushtymelike@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |58517