http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22887
Summary: Disable voting for your own bugs Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: zilforever@gmail.com
Why people can vote for bugs that they reported? That make no sense.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22887
Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P2 |P5 CC| |kennybobs@o2.co.uk Platform|All |Other OS/Version|All |other Severity|trivial |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2010-06-07 19:51:32 --- Why doesn't it? Enough votes cause a bug to be automatically confirmed, and the bug reporter's bug is just as valid as anybody elses.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22887
--- Comment #2 from zil zilforever@gmail.com 2010-06-08 02:30:51 ---
Enough votes cause a bug to be automatically confirmed
What the sense of confirmed bug status if u can confirm your own bugs? Somebody else should do it.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22887
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2010-06-08 03:05:52 --- A person with enough bugzilla privileges already does a job of confirming a bug once there is a comment from another person who is able to reproduce the problem. Voting adds nothing except useless e-mail spam.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22887
--- Comment #4 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2010-06-08 09:09:33 --- (In reply to comment #2)
Enough votes cause a bug to be automatically confirmed
What the sense of confirmed bug status if u can confirm your own bugs? Somebody else should do it.
You cannot confirm your own bugs unless you have triage or higher access. This bug is not confirmed.
(In reply to comment #3)
A person with enough bugzilla privileges already does a job of confirming a bug once there is a comment from another person who is able to reproduce the problem. Voting adds nothing except useless e-mail spam.
In rare cases the bugs do get confirmed by votes. Theoretically it's a useful idea, but as you say, the Wine triage team are pretty on-the-ball.
Perhaps voting should simply be disabled, or all emails about them should be suppressed? It does seem fairly pointless getting emails about votes.
Either way, the reporter's vote is just as valid as yours or mine.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22887
--- Comment #5 from Ken Sharp kennybobs@o2.co.uk 2011-09-25 20:33:52 CDT --- Can we close this yet? It's still not a useful request.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22887
André H. nerv@dawncrow.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |nerv@dawncrow.de Resolution| |ABANDONED
--- Comment #6 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2012-03-03 06:44:11 CST --- Voting is disabled meanwhile.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22887
André H. nerv@dawncrow.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #7 from André H. nerv@dawncrow.de 2012-03-03 06:44:41 CST --- closing