http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34596
Bug #: 34596 Summary: Checkbox invisible when no focused Product: Wine Version: 1.7.2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: pkelbert@gmail.com Classification: Unclassified
I have a Delphi application which uses a DBCheckBox inside a DBCtrlGrid. On Windows the checkboxes are always visible as expected but on Wine 1.7.2 (under Ubuntu 12.04.2) checkboxes become visible only when focused.
I'm working on a mini test application once the original app depends on servers not available publicly but if someone has any ideia on how to work on it would be nice.
Thanks in advance.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34596
--- Comment #1 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- This is your friendly reminder that there has been no bug activity for over a year. Is this still an issue in current (1.7.37 or newer) wine? If so, please attach the terminal output in 1.7.37 (see http://wiki.winehq.org/FAQ#get_log).
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34596
super_man@post.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |super_man@post.com
--- Comment #2 from super_man@post.com --- Maybe close? New bug report with test application or console output. We can't fix anything here without more output.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34596
pkelbert@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from pkelbert@gmail.com --- I have no more condition to retest this issue 'cause we've already workarounded it.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34596
Bruno Jesus 00cpxxx@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED Resolution|INVALID |ABANDONED
--- Comment #4 from Bruno Jesus 00cpxxx@gmail.com --- (In reply to pkelbert from comment #3)
I have no more condition to retest this issue 'cause we've already workarounded it.
Thanks for letting us known.