New subject: [Bug 57688] secur32:GetUserNameExW NameFormat [8,12] not implemented

17 Jan 2025


      https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57688
Bug ID: 57688
           Summary: secur32:GetUserNameExW NameFormat [8,12] not
                    implemented
           Product: Wine
           Version: 10.0-rc5
          Hardware: x86-64
               URL: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/se
                    cext/ne-secext-extended_name_format
                OS: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: secur32
          Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org
          Reporter: winehq.tabloid372@passmail.net
      Distribution: Fedora
In
```
0148:fixme:secur32:GetUserNameExW NameFormat 8 not implemented
0158:fixme:secur32:GetUserNameExW NameFormat 12 not implemented
```
enum values not handled in the switch
https://github.com/wine-mirror/wine/blob/master/dlls/secur32/secur32.c#L1166
```
  NameUserPrincipal = 8,
  [..]
  NameDnsDomain = 12,
```
Since `NameSamCompatible` is already implemented in the upper part of the
switch and we have a domain then `NameDnsDomain` should be composable in a
fairly trivial way. Additionally, `NameUserPrincipal` seems to be a simpler
version of that logic with a calls to:
```
GetUserNameW(usrname, &len))
GetComputerNameW(samname, &len))
-> usrname+'@'+samname.
```
If I am not mistaken?
-- 
Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the
above URL to reply.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

[Bug 57688] New: secur32:GetUserNameExW NameFormat [8,12] not implemented