http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
Summary: installed 4oD crashes wine Product: Wine Version: 0.9.58. Platform: PC URL: http://www.channel4.com/4od/installer/channel4_on_demand .exe OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: drraph@gmail.com
Created an attachment (id=11727) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=11727) full output including backtrace of crash
Download http://www.channel4.com/4od/installer/channel4_on_demand.exe and run
wine channel4_on_demand.exe
It goes through a little of the install and then says it is downloading dotnetfx.exe. It then crashes with a backtrace I attach below.
Raphael
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
Raphael drraph@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|enhancement |normal
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
Raphael drraph@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|installed 4oD crashes wine |installing 4oD crashes wine
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
--- Comment #1 from Louis Lenders xerox_xerox2000@yahoo.co.uk 2008-03-29 14:29:17 --- Created an attachment (id=11729) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=11729) patch that reverts a commit
Hi, this is probably a duplicate of 11791. Could you try the attached patch and see if fixes the bug, to confirm it's a duplicate really? Thanks
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
--- Comment #2 from Raphael drraph@gmail.com 2008-03-30 06:16:38 --- That fixes the install crash thanks. The install gets much further and now fails on
"Failed to verify digital signature of file" "[...]dotnetfx.exe"
I suppose I should open a different bug report for that right? :)
Raphael
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
--- Comment #3 from Raphael drraph@gmail.com 2008-03-30 06:23:53 --- Reported the new bug to
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12290
Raphael
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-03-30 17:10:09 --- Duplicate then.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 11791 ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2008-03-30 17:10:16 --- Closing dupe.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
--- Comment #6 from Raphael drraph@gmail.com 2008-04-11 04:29:00 --- Bug still present in 0.9.59.
Raphael
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
--- Comment #7 from Misha Koshelev mk144210@bcm.edu 2008-04-11 07:56:38 --- btw, sorry I have been quite busy with work/school.
That commit fixed bug 9479. If you revert it I believe you'll reopen that bug and plus that patch per my testing was correct so the problem either is in actuality somewhere else (but exposed by that patch) or in a specific subcase for that patch which is not being handled. So I don't recommend simply reverting it.
Thanks Misha
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
--- Comment #8 from Raphael drraph@gmail.com 2008-05-06 02:18:20 --- Created an attachment (id=12769) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=12769) Latest crash report for 0.9.61
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
--- Comment #9 from Raphael drraph@gmail.com 2008-05-06 02:19:52 --- This bug is still present in 0.9.61. Should it be reopened?
Raphael
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12280
--- Comment #10 from Lei Zhang thestig@google.com 2008-05-06 16:34:40 --- No, this bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 11791, which is open.
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org