https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50891
Bug ID: 50891 Summary: Fedora 33 repository missing wine-*-common x86_64 packages Product: Packaging Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: wine-packages Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org Reporter: blacknova@tut.by CC: dimesio@earthlink.net Distribution: ---
After recent update of Fedora repository, all x64_64 versions of wine-*-common packages are missing.
DNF upgrade command complain on broken dependencies: Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package wine-staging64-1:6.4-1.1.x86_64 - nothing provides wine-staging-common = 1:6.5-1.2 needed by wine-staging64-1:6.5-1.2.x86_64 Problem 2: package winehq-staging-1:6.5-1.2.x86_64 requires wine-staging64 = 1:6.5-1.2, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package winehq-staging-1:6.4-1.1.x86_64 - nothing provides wine-staging-common = 1:6.5-1.2 needed by wine-staging64-1:6.5-1.2.x86_64 Problem 3: problem with installed package wine-staging64-1:6.4-1.1.x86_64 - package wine-staging64-1:6.4-1.1.x86_64 requires wine-staging-common = 1:6.4-1.1, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both wine-staging-common-1:6.5-2.1.i686 and wine-staging-common-1:6.4-1.1.i686 - cannot install the best update candidate for package wine-staging-common-1:6.4-1.1.i686 - nothing provides wine-staging-common = 1:6.5-1.2 needed by wine-staging64-1:6.5-1.2.x86_64
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50891
--- Comment #1 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net --- They're not missing; there's a mismatch in the build numbers appended to the i686 and x86_64 packages (2.1 vs 1.2). I've triggered a rebuild of both.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50891
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Novoseltsev blacknova@tut.by --- Created attachment 69704 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=69704 Repository file listing i686/x86_64 side-by-side.
Ah, no, they are really not present on file server as well.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50891
--- Comment #3 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net --- (In reply to Vladimir Novoseltsev from comment #2)
Created attachment 69704 [details] Repository file listing i686/x86_64 side-by-side.
Ah, no, they are really not present on file server as well.
Your screenshot shows the wine-devel packages, not wine-staging, and the versions match. The problem is only with the wine-staging packages.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50891
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Novoseltsev blacknova@tut.by --- I'm not sure why we argue about something easily checked. If you can follow to https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/fedora/33/x86_64/ (64 bit repo) you'll see that there are no "wine-*-common*.rpm" packages at all for any wine version. Not for stable, not for staging and not for devel. And yes these packages are present at https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/fedora/33/i686/ (32bit repo) with latest staging version flipped.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50891
--- Comment #5 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net --- (In reply to Vladimir Novoseltsev from comment #4)
I'm not sure why we argue about something easily checked. If you can follow to https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/fedora/33/x86_64/ (64 bit repo) you'll see that there are no "wine-*-common*.rpm" packages at all for any wine version. Not for stable, not for staging and not for devel.
Of course there aren't any wine-*-common packages in the 64 bit repository; there never have been. The wine-*-common package is 32 bit only. On a 64 bit system it provides the 32 bit parts needed for WoW64, which is why the 64 bit packages depend on it.
And this has nothing to do with your inability to install the current wine-staging packages, which as I said, is due to the mismatch in build number.
FYI, the rebuild on the OBS has completed, with matching build numbers. If you don't want to wait for the packages to be synced over here, you can get them from https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Emulators:/Wine:/Fedora/Fedora_33...
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50891
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Novoseltsev blacknova@tut.by --- (In reply to Rosanne DiMesio from comment #5)
(In reply to Vladimir Novoseltsev from comment #4)
I'm not sure why we argue about something easily checked. If you can follow to https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/fedora/33/x86_64/ (64 bit repo) you'll see that there are no "wine-*-common*.rpm" packages at all for any wine version. Not for stable, not for staging and not for devel.
Of course there aren't any wine-*-common packages in the 64 bit repository; there never have been. The wine-*-common package is 32 bit only. On a 64 bit system it provides the 32 bit parts needed for WoW64, which is why the 64 bit packages depend on it.
Didn't know that, sorry for the noise.
And this has nothing to do with your inability to install the current wine-staging packages, which as I said, is due to the mismatch in build number.
FYI, the rebuild on the OBS has completed, with matching build numbers. If you don't want to wait for the packages to be synced over here, you can get them from https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Emulators:/Wine:/Fedora/Fedora_33...
Thanks, I'll be able to check that in a couple of hours.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50891
Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Fedora 33 repository |Fedora 33 mismatch in build |missing wine-*-common |number between 32 and 64 |x86_64 packages |bit packages
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50891
Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net --- The rebuilt packages have been synced over to our download server.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50891
Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #8 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net --- Closing fixed packaging bug.
-
WineHQ Bugzilla