https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41110
Bug ID: 41110 Summary: Packages for Fedora 24 Product: Packaging Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-packages Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org Reporter: dimesio@earthlink.net CC: michael@fds-team.de, sebastian@fds-team.de Distribution: ---
Fedora 24 was released at the end of June. There are still no WineHQ packages for it.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41110
Sebastian Lackner sebastian@fds-team.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Lackner sebastian@fds-team.de --- (In reply to Rosanne DiMesio from comment #0)
Fedora 24 was released at the end of June. There are still no WineHQ packages for it.
Thanks for the reminder. I've pushed packages for Fedora 24 and have added instructions to the Wiki. Does it still make sense to keep Fedora 22, or can we assume most users have already switched to 23/24?
BTW: According to my tests, users might run into this multilib bug when trying to install the packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325666. Should this be mentioned on the Fedora page?
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41110
--- Comment #2 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net --- (In reply to Sebastian Lackner from comment #1)
Thanks for the reminder. I've pushed packages for Fedora 24 and have added instructions to the Wiki. Does it still make sense to keep Fedora 22, or can we assume most users have already switched to 23/24?
How about one more package for the next Wine release, then drop support for 22? That will put us in line with Fedora's EOL policy, which provides updated packages for "about a month" after official EOL (which was July 19 for Fedora 22). It will also give me a chance to post a notice on the forum about the ending support.
BTW: According to my tests, users might run into this multilib bug when trying to install the packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325666. Should this be mentioned on the Fedora page?
Yes, it should be mentioned.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41110
Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net --- Closing fixed Packaging bugs.