https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44559
Bug ID: 44559 Summary: Under one circumstance Wine set opened windows as part of the active desktop background Product: Wine Version: 2.20 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org Reporter: ricky.tigg@gmail.com Distribution: ---
Created attachment 60521 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=60521 Wine – snapshot effect issue
Description of problem: Once clicked onto the title bar of an application emulated by Wine in order to enlarge its respective window, all the windows already opened then on the same desktop, including the window of the application whose title bar has been clicked on, are suddenly and for the duration of the wine session set as part of the desktop active background picture.
Version-Release number of selected component in Fedora 27: wine-2.20-1.fc27.x86_64
Steps to Reproduce in terminal: $ sudo dnf install -y wine $ wget https://www.grc.com/files/DNSBench.exe $ wine DNSBench.exe (alternatively click the respective execute file)
Actual results: Result is similar to a snapshot of the desktop background at a definite time, which in that case corresponds to the time the operation of clicking the title bar of an application emulated by Wine was accomplished.
As noticeable the width of the title bar of the emulated application's enlarged window does not correspond to the width of enlarged window. See attachment.
Expected results: No snapshot effect. The width of the title bar of the emulated application's enlarged window to correspond to the width of enlarged window.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546776
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44559
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org --- That app refuses to be resized horizontally, I don't think there's much we can do about that. You can uncheck "Allow the window manager to decorate the windows" to get the correct behavior.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44559
--- Comment #2 from ricky.tigg@gmail.com --- Is the report then eligible for status CLOSED, CANTFIX?