http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18186
Summary: Microsoft Money 99 unable to load saved files Product: Wine Version: 1.1.19 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: arcepi@arcepi.net
Microsoft Money 99 is unable to load previously saved files which can be opened perfectly running Money 99 on Windows.
Microsoft Money reports that the file is corrupted.
No errors or fixmes are reported on console, apart from a RtlCompactHeap.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18186
--- Comment #1 from Adriano Sant'Anna adriano.santanna@bol.com.br 2009-05-17 11:03:47 --- Created an attachment (id=21146) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=21146) console reports
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18186
Adriano Sant'Anna adriano.santanna@bol.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adriano.santanna@bol.com.br
--- Comment #2 from Adriano Sant'Anna adriano.santanna@bol.com.br 2009-05-17 11:05:58 --- Same here, with wine 1.1.21 (Ubuntu Jaunty) and MSMoney99br (brazilian portuguese version). I attached my console reports.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18186
Xavi Ivars xavi.ivars@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavi.ivars@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Xavi Ivars xavi.ivars@gmail.com 2009-09-14 06:08:12 --- Any improvement on this?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18186
Leonardo leonardo.f.cardoso@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leonardo.f.cardoso@gmail.co | |m
--- Comment #4 from Leonardo leonardo.f.cardoso@gmail.com 2010-03-07 07:40:43 --- Same here with Ubuntu 9.10, wine-1.1.39, and MSMoney99 BR
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18186
--- Comment #5 from Juan Lang juan_lang@yahoo.com 2010-03-30 10:48:49 --- This might be the same as bug 6698. Does the hack attached to it help? http://bugs2.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=24674
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18186
--- Comment #6 from Leonardo leonardo.f.cardoso@gmail.com 2010-03-30 20:38:57 --- Hack show in Comment #5 works.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18186
Juan Lang juan_lang@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #7 from Juan Lang juan_lang@yahoo.com 2010-03-30 22:05:37 --- Thanks, then it's indeed a dup. I've sent patches for this already, see bug 6698.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 6698 ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18186
--- Comment #8 from Juan Lang juan_lang@yahoo.com 2010-03-30 22:06:12 --- Closing dup.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18186
Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #9 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2010-03-31 00:41:50 --- Closing duplicate.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18186
--- Comment #10 from Adriano Sant'Anna adriano.santanna@bol.com.br 2010-03-31 08:51:58 --- I've never patched a linux app before. Someone could show how could one apply that patch, step by step?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18186
--- Comment #11 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2010-03-31 11:16:56 --- (In reply to comment #10)
I've never patched a linux app before. Someone could show how could one apply that patch, step by step?
http://wiki.winehq.org/Patching
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18186
--- Comment #12 from Juan Lang juan_lang@yahoo.com 2010-03-31 12:05:07 --- (In reply to comment #10)
I've never patched a linux app before. Someone could show how could one apply that patch, step by step?
Don't worry, a fix is in get. Get the latest git version, or wait for 1.1.42.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18186
--- Comment #13 from Juan Lang juan_lang@yahoo.com 2010-03-31 12:05:34 --- (In reply to comment #12)
Don't worry, a fix is in get.
Em, in *git*.