http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30763
Bug #: 30763 Summary: Please turn autoclose on in bugzilla Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: butraxz@gmail.com Classification: Unclassified
I propose turning autoclose on in bugzilla.
The reason is, that I have now gone experimentally thru about 300 old bugs, not touched for 600-900 days. I have got around 15 saying yes, the bug is still relevant to them, around 15 saying theirs can be abandoned, a few that have been reported as fixed but not closed in time and the rest, around 260 bugs got no answer. Which means propably that those are abandoned too.
Wine Bugzilla now has over 7000 open bugs from which over 4000 of which have not been touched for a year and about 700 for two or more years. Based on the findings above, I believe there would only be 10-15% bugs relevant today and all others are abandoned. The work of manually closing bugs imho no longer works in practice and I will stop it now as I believe I am able to draw the conclusions.
Every day 2-5 new bugs are logged, 0-4 closed and about 10 new gets more than 600 days old. This means that in practice Bugzilla grows larger and larger and searching what is relevant becomes harder and harder. I believe that the current manual bugzilla closing practice can no longer bring relevant state of wine to contributors.
In 2-3 years technology advances with great pace and interest in what wine can do changes too. Programs get born and die. Programs famous six months ago may no longer be famous today, for example most games are short to play and short-lived in these days. HW is updated and interests change. In 6 months wine gets 12 new releases and if I log a bug and no-one wants to touch it for six months, it is most likely a zombie.
I have found in practice, that when I ask whether a person could update the status of a zombie bug that they have created, some people just neglet it and some get hostile of it being touched without me first testing whether it is still relevant, althought I they themselves have not bothered to update their own bugs for 2-3 years.
I feel that the open bug situation in bugzilla has got out of hands.
Therefore I propose turning autoclose on in bugzilla for bugs with no activity for 6 monts. There are multiple of implementations of autoclose in bugzilla.org, so this is not a technical issue.
The text could be on the lines : 'This bug has been automatically closed by bugzilla as abandoned because it has had no activity for 6 months. OP or Administrator can reopen this bug after retesting with latest version of wine and supplying up to date information about the status of this bug'.
Nothing would be lost, bugs would only get closed and could be manually reopened as often as OP or admin feels like it. Wine project itself says that it provides only the APIs that are relevant to running the currently popular set of programs.
It does not support old programs forever, dos is being phased out, windows 9x is given minimal effort, win8 with winRT is coming etc. If all zombies would be closed, could the relevant ones be immediately seen. Autoclose is also neutral job unlike a person closing it. I feel that up to date bugs are much more relevant to wine than faster and faster cumulating number of thousands upon thousands bugs in unknown state.
Sorry that I am not able to do more, just giving this as my five cents worth…
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30763
--- Comment #1 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2012-05-24 21:08:04 CDT --- IMHO, a WONTFIX. Many of these bugs are still valid, and you should really test bugs with a download before asking others to do so.
Yes, some are abandoned, but having open bugs doesn't really hurt anything, the bugs that have more activity are more likely to get fixed.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30763
Bruno Jesus 00cpxxx@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |00cpxxx@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Bruno Jesus 00cpxxx@gmail.com 2012-05-24 21:18:12 CDT --- IMO we should stick with the current "rules" of reminders and manual abandonment after 6 months of no answer in bugs without download or patch. It's obviously a tedious and slow job but it's better than auto-closing bugs which could cause flame wars.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30763
Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|-unknown |bugzilla-unknown Product|Wine |WineHQ Bugzilla
--- Comment #3 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net 2012-05-24 23:16:30 CDT --- Setting product to WineHQ Bugzilla.
I agree this should be a WONTFIX; just because there has been no activity in 6 months doesn't mean a bug has been abandoned. There is actually no point in repeatedly posting "still an issue" in bugs where the cause is known and everyone involved knows it hasn't been fixed. The judgment of whether a bug is truly abandoned has to be made by someone who bothers to read the whole bug report.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30763
Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC| |dank@kegel.com Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #4 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2012-05-25 10:58:54 CDT --- Established practice in Wine is to let bugs marinate for a long time until somebody happens to have time to fix them.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30763
Frédéric Delanoy frederic.delanoy@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from Frédéric Delanoy frederic.delanoy@gmail.com 2012-05-31 07:18:39 CDT --- Closing WONTFIX bugs.