http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23557
Summary: wine versions 1.1.x not listed Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: jarekczek@poczta.onet.pl
If I try to submit an app, a version or a test for appdb, I have to choose wine version. I see 1.0.0, 1.0.1 and 1.2.rcx. I test the app on 1.1.42 and I know that the silver rank is not achievable under wine 1.0.1. I have no possibility to install wine 1.2. Something must be changed.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23557
Jarek jarekczek@poczta.onet.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jarekczek@poczta.onet.pl
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23557
--- Comment #1 from Jeff Zaroyko jeffz@jeffz.name 2010-07-08 05:39:51 --- why can't you install one of the previous 6 versions of Wine? Packages are usually up to date for popular/recent distros.
If you have trouble compiling help is at hand via the forum @ http://forum.winehq.org
Of these 6 most recent versions listed, the oldest was released two and a half months ago. The reason for not having more than the 6 most recent is that Wine is released so frequently with many fixes, people are most often interested in the latest behavior.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23557
Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |dank@kegel.com Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2010-07-08 10:33:12 --- The appdb allows browsing for applications based on wine version tested with, and it would be quite useful to be able to look for apps tested with 1.1 much further back than the existing limit of six. IMHO we should increase that number significantly.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23557
Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2010-07-08 10:37:47 --- That's by design. AppDB lists only last 6 beta versions and release versions.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23557
Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #4 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2010-07-08 10:38:35 --- Closing
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23557
--- Comment #5 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2010-07-08 12:30:32 --- Yes, I know it's by design, but it's still broken.
I would reopen this but I don't want to get into a pissing match.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23557
--- Comment #6 from Jarek jarekczek@poczta.onet.pl 2010-07-08 15:34:31 --- I use the freshest binary which is 1.1.42 for Debian. I don't feel like compiling. Is it an alternative: compile or stop testing and stop feeding appdb?
Why should all the people waste time for compiling? Let a few compile and the rest use binaries. Let's be effective.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23557
Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Comment #7 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2010-07-08 16:20:37 --- Supporting at least the most recent version in Debian seems reasonable.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23557
Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Platform|All |Other Resolution| |WONTFIX OS/Version|All |other
--- Comment #8 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2010-07-08 18:11:10 --- We been here already. Those changes where made for a reason. If you do not have a fresh binary version for your distro it's your distro packager's problem. Here we assume you compile Wine from source before reporting any problems.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23557
Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #9 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2010-07-08 18:11:45 --- Closing. File bug with Debian for not providing fresh Wine packages. Or compile Wine from source.