https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
Bug ID: 39612 Summary: xcopy output has wrong capitalization Product: Wine Version: 1.7.53 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: programs Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org Reporter: fiendishx@gmail.com Distribution: ---
Wine xcopy prints "<#> file(s) copied" with a lowercase f, but Windows XP's xcopy prints "<#> File(s) copied" with a capital F.
I noticed because it broke a script of mine that extracts that last print statement.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |download, patch Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- https://source.winehq.org/patches/data/116750
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |austinenglish@gmail.com
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- WONTFIX, see https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2015-December/110708.html
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
--- Comment #3 from fiendishx@gmail.com --- (In reply to Austin English from comment #2)
WONTFIX, see https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2015-December/110708.html
Huh. That feels like a bizarre decision.
I don't understand how it can be marked wontfix (after the fix patch was already created, no less) based on an assumption about the realness or distribution of the script in question rather than on the actual presence of a difference between behavior in Wine vs Windows. If I say that thousands of people have distribution of the software in question that includes the script does that change how real it is? I think that's the wrong benchmark. :\
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39612
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #4 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- (In reply to fiendishx from comment #3)
(In reply to Austin English from comment #2)
WONTFIX, see https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2015-December/110708.html
Huh. That feels like a bizarre decision.
I don't understand how it can be marked wontfix (after the fix patch was already created, no less) based on an assumption about the realness or distribution of the script in question rather than on the actual presence of a difference between behavior in Wine vs Windows. If I say that thousands of people have distribution of the software in question that includes the script does that change how real it is? I think that's the wrong benchmark. :\
It's partially due to copyrights. It can be permissible to copy if it is for interoperability, but not 'just because'. Published/popular applications have a stronger claim than a script for personal use that can be easily edited (unlike a compiled binary application).
I know that doesn't help in your case, sorry about that, but wanted to give some explanation.