http://bugs.winehq.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642
*** shadow/642 Fri May 3 09:53:14 2002 --- shadow/642.tmp.1809 Fri May 3 09:55:32 2002 *************** *** 5,11 **** | Status: UNCONFIRMED Version: 20010112 | | Resolution: Platform: | | Severity: normal OS/Version: All | ! | Priority: P1 Component: wine-binary | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Assigned To: wine-bugs@winehq.com | | Reported By: christof@petig-baender.de | --- 5,11 ---- | Status: UNCONFIRMED Version: 20010112 | | Resolution: Platform: | | Severity: normal OS/Version: All | ! | Priority: P1 Component: wine-gui | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Assigned To: wine-bugs@winehq.com | | Reported By: christof@petig-baender.de | *************** *** 27,29 **** --- 27,33 ---- Minor opcode of failed request: 14 (XF86VidModeSetClientVersion) Serial number of failed request: 168 Current serial number in output stream: 169 + + ------- Additional Comments From christof@petig-baender.de 2002-05-03 09:55 ------- + looks like wine-gui is more appropriate (bug 640 used it) ... Why isn't there a + x11driver product?