[Bug 20549] New: secur32 memory leak on exit?

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20549

Summary: secur32 memory leak on exit?
           Product: Wine
           Version: 1.1.32
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: download
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: secur32
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]

Valgrinding the chromium net_unittests (particularly, the ftp and http tests)
yields definite leak reports like this:

664 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 864 of 968
   at malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:195)
   by 0x101657FF: ???
   ...
   by 0x100F0324: ???
   by SECUR32_initSchannelSP (schannel.c:1376)
   by SECUR32_initializeProviders (secur32.c:559)
   by DllMain (secur32.c:1178)

This doesn't seem like a big deal, but it is a bit of a mystery,
since the DLL clearly tries to free that memory on unload.

[Bug 20549] secur32 memory leak on exit?

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20549

Juan Lang  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Juan Lang   2009-11-02 13:14:01 ---
That would be a problem in gnutls, then, not in schannel.  Here's confirmation
of it on their mailing lists, from 2005:
http://arkiv.netbsd.se/?ml=gnutls-dev&a=2005-02&m=2789984

In brief, the following program leaks memory:
int main()
{
        gnutls_global_init();
        gnutls_global_deinit();
        return 0;
}

There was a bunch of arguing about it, e.g. here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/1394

The upshot is, they don't think it's a bug, since the memory gets freed when
the process exits.  I think you should suppress this one.

[Bug 20549] secur32 memory leak on exit?

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20549

Dmitry Timoshkov  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Timoshkov   2009-11-03 00:58:05 ---
Closing invalid.