[Bug 43388] New: valgrind shows a few definite leaks in dlls/winmm/tests/ mci.c

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43388

Bug ID: 43388
           Summary: valgrind shows a few definite leaks in
                    dlls/winmm/tests/mci.c
           Product: Wine
           Version: 2.12
          Hardware: x86
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: winmm&mci
          Assignee: [e-mail]
          Reporter: [e-mail]
      Distribution: Gentoo

==2739== 0 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 6 of 1,022
==2739==    at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254)
==2739==    by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==2739==    by 0x523E42B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187)
==2739==    by 0x523ECCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405)
==2739==    by 0x523ECCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0)
==2739==    by 0x1A4983D5: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49D191: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49D275: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49D767: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49DC76: ???
==2739==    by 0x19B3BF99: ???
==2739==    by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700)
==2739==    by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759)
==2739==    by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700)
==2739==    by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487)
==2739==    by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333)
==2739==    by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114)
==2739==

==2739== 0 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 7 of 1,022
==2739==    at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254)
==2739==    by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==2739==    by 0x523E42B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187)
==2739==    by 0x523ECCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405)
==2739==    by 0x523ECCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0)
==2739==    by 0x1A4983D5: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49D191: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49D275: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49D767: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49DC8D: ???
==2739==    by 0x19B3BF99: ???
==2739==    by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700)
==2739==    by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759)
==2739==    by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700)
==2739==    by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487)
==2739==    by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333)
==2739==    by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114)
==2739==

==2739== 0 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 12 of 1,022
==2739==    at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254)
==2739==    by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==2739==    by 0x523E42B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187)
==2739==    by 0x523ECCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405)
==2739==    by 0x523ECCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0)
==2739==    by 0x1A4983D5: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49D191: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49D275: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49D767: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49DC76: ???
==2739==    by 0x19C52F99: ???
==2739==    by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700)
==2739==    by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759)
==2739==    by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700)
==2739==    by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487)
==2739==    by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333)
==2739==    by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114)
==2739==

==2739== 0 bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 13 of 1,022
==2739==    at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254)
==2739==    by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716)
==2739==    by 0x523E42B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187)
==2739==    by 0x523ECCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405)
==2739==    by 0x523ECCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0)
==2739==    by 0x1A4983D5: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49D191: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49D275: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49D767: ???
==2739==    by 0x1A49DC8D: ???
==2739==    by 0x19C52F99: ???
==2739==    by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700)
==2739==    by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759)
==2739==    by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700)
==2739==    by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487)
==2739==    by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333)
==2739==    by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114)
==2739==