https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Bug ID: 47018 Summary: Black transparent images Product: Wine Version: 4.6 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: dwmapi Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org Reporter: sk9258user@mail.ru Distribution: ---
Created attachment 64174 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64174 wine
In some apps I see black images, but in Windows images is normal.
https://mega.nz/#!P35GwAZI!lhBkgqiKTHSbFgvgMr4zitLMc1OiQmB6z7YcSUWtS7A
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #1 from masteruser82841 sk9258user@mail.ru --- Created attachment 64175 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64175 windows
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #2 from masteruser82841 sk9258user@mail.ru --- Created attachment 64176 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64176 log
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
masteruser82841 sk9258user@mail.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://mega.nz/#!P35GwAZI! | |lhBkgqiKTHSbFgvgMr4zitLMc1O | |iQmB6z7YcSUWtS7A
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED URL|https://mega.nz/#!P35GwAZI! | |lhBkgqiKTHSbFgvgMr4zitLMc1O | |iQmB6z7YcSUWtS7A | CC| |o.dierick@piezo-forte.be Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be --- Hello,
The issue might be valid, i don't know, but the link you provided is not an official Microsoft .NET framework download. It is a repackaged Microsoft .NET framework from a software publisher flagged as making warez.
https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/237380-malwarebytes-blocking-diakovnet...
--- quote from reddit (r/thepiratebay/) --- Diakov makes the best repacks of cracked software. (...) --- quote from reddit (r/thepiratebay/) ---
As a precaution, I've emptied the URL field, but I can't edit the comment. Please, can someone with administrator privileges check on this?
Resolving INVALID
Regards
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|dwmapi |-unknown
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #4 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- Comment marked private, though I don't think I can edit the history :/
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |focht@gmx.net
--- Comment #5 from Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net --- Hello folks,
although the software to demonstrate this (.NET Frameworks bundle/repacks) is kinda questionable, it's still a valid problem.
I've checked one of the images from installer temp folder and it seems it's BMPv3 32-bit RGBA BMP.
--- snip --- $ identify -verbose example.bmp Image: example.bmp Format: BMP3 (Microsoft Windows bitmap image (V3)) Class: DirectClass Geometry: 180x180+0+0 Resolution: 37.8x37.8 Print size: 4.7619x4.7619 Units: PixelsPerCentimeter Colorspace: sRGB Type: TrueColorAlpha Base type: Undefined Endianess: Undefined Depth: 8-bit Channel depth: red: 8-bit green: 8-bit blue: 8-bit alpha: 8-bit Channel statistics: Pixels: 32400 Red: min: 0 (0) max: 255 (1) mean: 18.9594 (0.0743508) standard deviation: 47.832 (0.187577) kurtosis: 7.71067 skewness: 2.89721 entropy: 0.359215 Green: min: 0 (0) max: 255 (1) mean: 41.5781 (0.163052) standard deviation: 77.3974 (0.303519) kurtosis: 1.11741 skewness: 1.62853 entropy: 0.401715 Blue: min: 0 (0) max: 255 (1) mean: 52.461 (0.205729) standard deviation: 94.0989 (0.369015) kurtosis: 0.098198 skewness: 1.3995 entropy: 0.375133 Alpha: min: 0 (0) max: 255 (1) mean: 70.5453 (0.276648) standard deviation: 109.348 (0.428814) kurtosis: -0.92384 skewness: 0.999178 entropy: 0.272297 Image statistics: Overall: min: 0 (0) max: 255 (1) mean: 45.886 (0.179945) standard deviation: 82.169 (0.322231) kurtosis: 0.93147 skewness: 1.62979 entropy: 0.35209 Alpha: none #00000000 Rendering intent: Perceptual Gamma: 0.454545 Chromaticity: red primary: (0.64,0.33) green primary: (0.3,0.6) blue primary: (0.15,0.06) white point: (0.3127,0.329) Background color: white Border color: srgba(223,223,223,1) Matte color: grey74 Transparent color: none Interlace: None Intensity: Undefined Compose: Over Page geometry: 180x180+0+0 Dispose: Undefined Iterations: 0 Compression: None Orientation: Undefined Properties: date:create: 2019-04-15T11:04:41+02:00 date:modify: 2013-10-19T18:34:08+02:00 signature: e9d311d9d6038ff592c738b526280d10a874ef3531c8caf3e35643ff983b8898 Artifacts: filename: example.bmp verbose: true Tainted: False Filesize: 129654B Number pixels: 32400 Pixels per second: 3240000B User time: 0.000u Elapsed time: 0:01.009 Version: ImageMagick 6.9.9-38 Q16 x86_64 2018-03-12 http://www.imagemagick.org --- snip ---
--- snip --- $ xxd example.bmp | head -4 00000000: 424d 76fa 0100 0000 0000 3600 0000 2800 BMv.......6...(. 00000010: 0000 b400 0000 b400 0000 0100 2000 0000 ............ ... 00000020: 0000 0000 0000 c40e 0000 c40e 0000 0000 ................ 00000030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ --- snip ---
Anyway, I can't be arsed all the time to duplicate bugs into useful ones.
Regards
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #6 from Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be --- Hello,
(In reply to Austin English from comment #4)
Comment marked private, though I don't think I can edit the history :/
Thanks.
I just wanted to prevent testers from naively downloading the questionable application. I don't think people will look for download URLs in the history so that's fine for me.
(In reply to Anastasius Focht from comment #5)
Anyway, I can't be arsed all the time to duplicate bugs into useful ones.
Why would you want to do that in the first place?
Until the issue is confirmed to affect a legit application, you don't have to look into it, if you don't want to. There are plenty of other valid bugs to work on in the meantime.
If you decide to look into the bug anyway, then it's your decision and complaining about having to do it is illogical.
Regards
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #7 from masteruser82841 sk9258user@mail.ru --- Url for test this bug: https://mega.nz/#!P35GwAZI!lhBkgqiKTHSbFgvgMr4zitLMc1OiQmB6z7YcSUWtS7A
This is not virus
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
masteruser82841 sk9258user@mail.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://mega.nz/#!P35GwAZI! | |lhBkgqiKTHSbFgvgMr4zitLMc1O | |iQmB6z7YcSUWtS7A
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
masteruser82841 sk9258user@mail.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID |---
--- Comment #8 from masteruser82841 sk9258user@mail.ru --- This is actual bug, please test and fix
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|https://mega.nz/#!P35GwAZI! | |lhBkgqiKTHSbFgvgMr4zitLMc1O | |iQmB6z7YcSUWtS7A |
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
masteruser82841 sk9258user@mail.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://mega.nz/#!P35GwAZI! | |lhBkgqiKTHSbFgvgMr4zitLMc1O | |iQmB6z7YcSUWtS7A
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #9 from masteruser82841 sk9258user@mail.ru --- https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/b62bf9097aed15c7ca63262d20a5cc3a4d88427b...
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED URL|https://mega.nz/#!P35GwAZI! | |lhBkgqiKTHSbFgvgMr4zitLMc1O | |iQmB6z7YcSUWtS7A | Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #10 from Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be --- Hello,
Pleading in favor of a bug is fine, but to keep putting back a link that has been removed as a precautionary measure is not. I consider it as advertisement, trolling and/or spam.
There are many good reasons [*] to not put the link back in the URL field or comments and I will therefore ask you to stop doing that.
Regards
[*] In addition to the questionability of the application, the link is a blind link to a direct download on a third party file hosting service. That may or may not be a violation of the software license.
I note that there are no mega.nz download links on the publisher's website. There is a Microsoft .NET Framework Final 4.8.0 bundle, but the sizes differs and the screen captures show that the link point to an older version. The origin of the linked file is unknown.
A link to the download page of the original software publisher website would be better, but since it's flagged as a warez/crack site I would still advise against it. Keep in mind that WineHQ bugs are public and will be scanned by online security services for links to malware files or websites. It could get undeserved bad ratings because of the links to flagged websites or files.
A developer who finds interest in the issue and wants to test the app should know what he's doing. He could still fetch the link from the bug history or download directly from the publisher (visible in the screen captures).
DISCLAIMER: I don't speak in the name of the Wine project, community or staff, or any other entity but myself.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
masteruser82841 sk9258user@mail.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|INVALID |--- URL| |https://mega.nz/#!P35GwAZI! | |lhBkgqiKTHSbFgvgMr4zitLMc1O | |iQmB6z7YcSUWtS7A Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #11 from masteruser82841 sk9258user@mail.ru --- if you touch my links again I will complain to you. This is newest version directly from diakov.net, I downloaded it for 3 hours from a paid file sharing service, especially for the test, put a link to a virus checking site, and you are still unhappy with something.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|https://mega.nz/#!P35GwAZI! | |lhBkgqiKTHSbFgvgMr4zitLMc1O | |iQmB6z7YcSUWtS7A |
--- Comment #12 from Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com --- (In reply to masteruser82841 from comment #11)
if you touch my links again I will complain to you. This is newest version directly from diakov.net, I downloaded it for 3 hours from a paid file sharing service, especially for the test, put a link to a virus checking site, and you are still unhappy with something.
You're missing a point. Use of repackaged, cracked, "portable", or software altered in some other way is discouraged here. Same goes for private file sharing links - if you have legitimate source to download your application, post a link to it, or instruction how to get it. Private shared copies of something that's not yours to distribute are not that.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
masteruser82841 sk9258user@mail.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://mega.nz/#!P35GwAZI! | |lhBkgqiKTHSbFgvgMr4zitLMc1O | |iQmB6z7YcSUWtS7A
--- Comment #13 from masteruser82841 sk9258user@mail.ru --- What should I do if there is no other way to detect a bug? I don't care what you think, I provided security evidence files, and it was rebooted by me on mega due to the fact that with a hitfile where it was originally, it took a very long time to download it, and not for free. I will continue to return the url.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|https://mega.nz/#!P35GwAZI! | |lhBkgqiKTHSbFgvgMr4zitLMc1O | |iQmB6z7YcSUWtS7A | Severity|normal |minor Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #14 from Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be --- Hello,
(In reply to masteruser82841 from comment #11)
if you touch my links again I will complain to you.
Threatening? Great! I'll will have the opportunity to hone my lawyer skills and get my vacations paid from you. Which country do you live in?
Joke aside, threatening will lead you nowhere but put you in trouble. If you have a personal problem with me I suggest that you contact me privately.
(In reply to masteruser82841 from comment #13)
What should I do if there is no other way to detect a bug? I don't care what you think, I provided security evidence files, and it was rebooted by me on mega due to the fact that with a hitfile where it was originally, it took a very long time to download it, and not for free. I will continue to return the url.
It depends on the license of the software which I don't know anything about.
Usually, license to use a software doesn't allow you to publicly share it. If the license and local laws allows it, you may send a private copy to a software specialist that will test the application on your behalf, but that must be done confidentially and under professional secret. Otherwise it is a violation of the copyright and/or of the licensing terms.
Moreover, you may be violating the rights of the owner of the software by making a free public link of his software while he wanted to earn money from paid download links, and The Wine project may be held liable for publishing the link. That's why linking to your private copy is discouraged.
In the situation where there are no free links to a legitimate redistributable copy or demo of the software, the bug reporter is expected to state that the software is proprietary and wait for instructions from the devs. While having access to the software helps in debugging, it is not required: The affected users can run commands and provide feedback. The devs could also test the application themselves if they have a legitimate copy of their own.
There is no point in insisting to make the link publicly visible.
Also, a black background in the installer logo is a minor issue that doesn't prevent the application from working. It doesn't seem to affect any other applications or else there would already be a bug about it, and this one would just be a dupe. There are official .NET framework installers from Microsoft that run fine in Wine and you provide no use case that requires the use of that specific repackaging.
Regards
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|minor |normal Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX
--- Comment #15 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- (In reply to masteruser82841 from comment #13)
What should I do if there is no other way to detect a bug? I don't care what you think, I provided security evidence files, and it was rebooted by me on mega due to the fact that with a hitfile where it was originally, it took a very long time to download it, and not for free. I will continue to return the url.
This is Wine's bugzilla, WineHQ sets the rules, not you.
Pirated/cracked software is not supported. Period. Since you continue to (aggressively) flaunt that rule after being told not to, I'm going to close this bug and lock your account.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #16 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com --- (In reply to Austin English from comment #15)
(In reply to masteruser82841 from comment #13)
What should I do if there is no other way to detect a bug? I don't care what you think, I provided security evidence files, and it was rebooted by me on mega due to the fact that with a hitfile where it was originally, it took a very long time to download it, and not for free. I will continue to return the url.
This is Wine's bugzilla, WineHQ sets the rules, not you.
Pirated/cracked software is not supported. Period. Since you continue to (aggressively) flaunt that rule after being told not to, I'm going to close this bug and lock your account.
Closing.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yurikazakov9184@gmail.com
--- Comment #17 from Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be --- *** Bug 47113 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #18 from Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de --- *** Bug 47113 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #19 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru --- Created attachment 64324 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64324 test app
The problem is caused by difference between user32 and comctl32 in the bitmap painting performed by the static control implementation. Attached test app contains 2 executables: one without the manifest, and another one with it. Under Windows the executable without a manifest shows exactly the same ugly not transparent image as seen under Wine. Executable with manifest draws a transparent bitmaps image.
Replacing StretchBlt() by GdiAlphaBlend() makes the bitmap in question paint correctly, but that breaks painting of other images. Probably comctl32's "Static" implementation should detect whether and image has non-zero alpha channel, and use GdiAlphaBlend in that case.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #20 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru --- *** Bug 47113 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |--- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
--- Comment #21 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru --- Reopening.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEW
--- Comment #22 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru --- And confirming.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #23 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru --- Created attachment 64325 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64325 hack
Attached hack makes the bitmap in question paint correctly, but that breaks painting of other images.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Józef Kucia joseph.kucia@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|-unknown |comctl32
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #24 from double55 yurikazakov9184@gmail.com --- Since this fix breaks other images, I will wait a few more days
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #25 from double55 yurikazakov9184@gmail.com --- Why did everyone shut up as soon as the error was confirmed? Correct, do not hesitate
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #26 from Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be --- Created attachment 64338 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64338 Windows 10 VM - Wine 4.7 - 32-bit BMP TrueColorAlpha comparison
(In reply to double55 from comment #25)
Why did everyone shut up as soon as the error was confirmed? Correct, do not hesitate
Hello,
This is not a forum, please keep quiet unless you have useful information for the bug. There is no schedule for fixing bugs. This is a voluntary project and people have other things to do.
"Don't: Ask when the bug will be fixed. If a fix is in progress, it'll likely be posted in the bug" (https://wiki.winehq.org/Bugs#Do.27s_and_Don.27ts)
FYI, I tested the test app with the hack and I confirm it enables transparency on V3 bitmaps.
I made a comparison between Windows 10 and Wine 4.7 using my own sample BMP files with the test app.
Regards
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #27 from Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be --- Created attachment 64339 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64339 TrueColorAlpha BMP display with eog
FYI, attached is the TrueColorAlpha sample BMP files displayed in eog (gnome default image viewer).
With the BMPv4 made with gimp 2.8.14, the transparency can be seen as checkered background in eog. eog doesn't handle the transparency of the BMPv3 BMP made with ImageMagick 6.9.7-4.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Fabian Maurer dark.shadow4@web.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dark.shadow4@web.de
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Anastasius Focht focht@gmx.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch, source Summary|Black transparent images |Multiple applications show | |transparent bitmap images | |on static controls with | |black background (comctl32 | |lacking support for | |painting 32-bit BMPv3 with | |alpha channel)
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #28 from Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be --- Created attachment 64371 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=64371 Patch detects non-zero alpha channel in 32-bit bitmap and use it
Hello,
Here is a patch that tries to reasonably detect when an alpha channel is used in the bitmap and call GdiAlphaBlend() in that case.
Regards
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #29 from double55 yurikazakov9184@gmail.com --- This fix transparent alpha channel or only >0?
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #30 from Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be --- (In reply to double55 from comment #29)
This fix transparent alpha channel or only >0?
Hello,
The patch makes Wine calls GdiAlphaBlend() when at least one pixel has a non-zero alpha channel. If all pixel have alpha channel 0, then the image is considered opaque (this will be wrong for full transparent images, but who would use a full transparent image, anyway?).
The blending function uses the full alpha channel range (0-255).
If you see artifacts in the transparent image, that is another issue. (My tests show that the current Wine alpha blending function doesn't give a smooth alpha result).
Regards
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
--- Comment #31 from Olivier F. R. Dierick o.dierick@piezo-forte.be --- Hello,
I didn't see it earlier, but Dmitry Timoshkov has already submitted a patchset to Wine that aims at fixing this bug.
Regards
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Alistair Leslie-Hughes leslie_alistair@hotmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Staged patchset| |https://github.com/wine-sta | |ging/wine-staging/tree/mast | |er/patches/comctl32-alpha-b | |itmaps CC| |leslie_alistair@hotmail.com Status|NEW |STAGED
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|STAGED |RESOLVED Fixed by SHA1| |e2f179d84faa00efe6e34952eef | |48a6a5652ec92
--- Comment #32 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru --- Committed as e2f179d84faa00efe6e34952eef48a6a5652ec92.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47018
Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #33 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org --- Closing bugs fixed in 5.2.
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org -
WineHQ Bugzilla