http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32623
Bug #: 32623 Summary: Please add a "downstream" resolution Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: dimesio@earthlink.net Classification: Unclassified
Bug 32593 is a good example of why we need it.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32623
--- Comment #1 from Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org 2013-01-02 06:01:16 CST --- I don't think we need a separate resolution for this, "upstream" really means "someone else's bug" so it can be used in this case too.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32623
Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net 2013-01-02 08:54:34 CST --- I think there's benefit in making it clearer to users when the "someone else" is whoever built their Wine package. Far too many users believe the Wine developers are responsible for their distro packages, and I spend an inordinate amount of time explaining that they aren't. A downstream resolution would help me drive home that message.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32623
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com 2013-01-08 17:28:57 CST --- Closing.