[Bug 16471] New: New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

Summary: New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine
           Product: Wine
           Version: 1.1.7
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: -unknown
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]

Created an attachment (id=17848)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=17848)
Message I get when trying to run Mplus 5.2 under wine

I am a user of Mplus, a statistical software package. For some time and from
versions 4.2 to 5.1, I successfully ran Mplus under wine in Linux.
Unfortunately, the newest version (5.2) no longer runs under wine.

I contacted the authors of Mplus and they indicated that the problem appears to
have arisen due to their use of the latest version of the Intel Fortran
compiler (10.1.025).

At present, I am using version 5.1 of Mplus, though it would be nice to be able
to use the more recent version.

If any more information is needed, I can ask the people who produce Mplus; they
are quite good about supporting their product and this would likely benefit
them as well.

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #1 from Jeff Zaroyko   2008-12-11 18:55:37 ---
please attach a bzip2'd WINEDEBUG=+relay,+seh,+tid log

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #2 from Alex Weiss   2008-12-11 19:13:02 ---
Here is the attached file.

Also, I am using wine-1.1.7 which was compiled under gcc 4.1.2 p1.1.

The command I ran was: wine /opt/Mplus_5.2/Mplus.exe

Best,

Alex

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #3 from Alex Weiss   2008-12-11 19:14:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=17850)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=17850)
Requested debugging output in .bz2 format.

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #4 from Alex Weiss   2008-12-11 19:15:35 ---
Also, I run wine 1.1.7 which was compiled under gcc 4.1.2.

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #5 from Jeff Zaroyko   2008-12-11 20:09:36 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Also, I run wine 1.1.7 which was compiled under gcc 4.1.2.

It's probably worth trying with Wine 1.1.10 to see if it changes anything.

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #6 from Alex Weiss   2008-12-11 21:11:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=17856)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=17856)
Ouput from trying to run Mplus 5.2 under wine-1.1.10

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #7 from Alex Weiss   2008-12-11 21:12:39 ---
Should have mentioned that it does not appear to work with wine 1.1.10 either.

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #8 from Vitaliy Margolen   2008-12-12 08:48:11 ---
Please do the following:
1. Make sure you have debug symbols for Wine installed. If you can't find them,
compile Wine yourself from the source and run it from compile dir
2. Run your program in this way:

winedbg Mplus.exe
....
Wine-dbg>cont
....exception...
Wine-dbg>bt all
Wine-dbg>exit

And attach (as a text file) complete terminal output of the above.

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #9 from Alex Weiss   2008-12-12 10:25:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=17874)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=17874)
winedbg output

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #10 from Alex Weiss   2008-12-12 10:27:06 ---
I am away from the office and cannot get an X display on this laptop. Thus, if
this is not sufficient, I will have to wait until I return home. However,
hopefully this isn't the case as the program I wish to run is not one that uses
a GUI or any other graphics.

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #11 from Vitaliy Margolen   2008-12-13 14:16:58 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Created an attachment (id=17874)

--> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=17874) [details]
> winedbg output
> X connection to localhost:10.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).

It didn't start properly. Were you running it from remote system?

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #12 from Alex Weiss   2008-12-17 02:25:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=18006)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=18006)
Correct output from requested attempt to run

Hi, yes, it was run remotely as I was away. Attached is the results I got when
I ran it from my terminal here at work.

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #13 from Alex Weiss   2008-12-22 07:32:01 ---
Hi,

Just a quick update on my situation. I recently upgraded to wine-1.1.11 and the
problem is still there.

Best,

Alex

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #14 from Alex Weiss   2009-01-03 07:11:13 ---
Just a quick note to inform you that after an upgrade to wine version 1.1.12
Mplus still fails to run. Please let me know if there's anything I can do to
assist.

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #15 from Alex Weiss   2009-01-17 11:27:18 ---
I have recently upgraded to wine-1.1.13 and the problem with mplus persists and
does not appear to give any different results. I would appreciate any update on
the status of this bug if possible or anything that was learned by my posting
the earlier material.

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

Louis Lenders  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #16 from Louis Lenders   2009-01-17 16:09:54 ---
Is there a way to reproduce the bug with the demo from
http://www.statmodel.com/demo.shtml ?

If so, provide exact steps howto trigger the bug please. thx

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #17 from Alex Weiss   2009-01-18 07:50:30 ---
I tried running that and I get a different (more detailed) output, though it
still isn't working. I suspect the underlying problem is the same as the demo
just limits the number of variables, etc. that the user has access to.

To get it to work, I installed the program under windows and then copied the
files over to my linux box's /opt/ folder (I used this same procedure to
install prior versions of Mplus and it worked flawlessly as there are no hidden
files, etc.)

Next I would try to use Mplus to run an example analysis (I will send you what
I ran via email). Simply use the following command:

wine /opt/Mplus\ Demo/Mpdemo5.exe

Upon the prompt, I then typed in ex3.1.inp

The results of doing this are as follows:

Mplus VERSION 5.2 DEMO
     MUTHEN & MUTHEN

Running input file 'ex3.1.inp'...

wine: Unhandled page fault on write access to 0x7ee1697c at address 0x12bb22f
(thread 0009), starting debugger...
Unhandled exception: page fault on write access to 0x7ee1697c, invalid program
stack in 32-bit code (0x012bb22f).
Register dump:
 CS:0073 SS:007b DS:007b ES:007b FS:0033 GS:003b
 EIP:012bb22f ESP:04369478 EBP:043694b8 EFLAGS:00210246(   - 00      -RIZP1)
 EAX:7ee1697c EBX:04369544 ECX:043699b0 EDX:8be58955
 ESI:04504a20 EDI:04504a20
Stack dump:
0x04369478:  b7d93bab 043694ec 04504b90 7ee1697c
0x04369488:  00000000 00000000 000037a5 043699b0
0x04369498:  000007d9 00000000 00000000 043699b0
0x043694a8:  00000000 00000000 043694e0 04504a20
0x043694b8:  04369554 01292eaf fffffffb 04369544
0x043694c8:  043699b0 00000004 04369510 00000040
Backtrace:
=>0 0x012bb22f in mpdemo5 (+0xebb22f) (0x043694b8)
  1 0x01292eaf in mpdemo5 (+0xe92eaf) (0x04369554)
  2 0x00419cbb in mpdemo5 (+0x19cbb) (0x04369af8)
  3 0x011ec444 in mpdemo5 (+0xdec444) (0x043dfe78)
  4 0x01347885 in mpdemo5 (+0xf47885) (0x043dfeb8)
  5 0x01327cf9 in mpdemo5 (+0xf27cf9) (0x043dff08)
  6 0x7ee45947 in kernel32 (+0x55947) (0x043dffe8)
  7 0xb7ddec03 wine_switch_to_stack+0x17() in libwine.so.1 (0x00000000)
0x012bb22f: movl        %edi,0x0(%eax)
Modules:
Module  Address                 Debug info      Name (22 modules)
PE        400000- 1602000       Export          mpdemo5
ELF     7bf00000-7bf04000       Deferred        <wine-loader>
ELF     7ed58000-7ed6e000       Deferred        psapi<elf>
  -PE  7ed60000-7ed6e000       \               psapi
ELF     7ed6e000-7edba000       Deferred        dbghelp<elf>
  -PE  7ed80000-7edba000       \               dbghelp
ELF     7edba000-7edd2000       Deferred        imagehlp<elf>
  -PE  7edc0000-7edd2000       \               imagehlp
ELF     7edd2000-7ef08000       Export          kernel32<elf>
  -PE  7edf0000-7ef08000       \               kernel32
ELF     7ef08000-7ef12000       Deferred        libnss_files.so.2
ELF     7ef12000-7ef1c000       Deferred        libnss_nis.so.2
ELF     7ef1c000-7ef33000       Deferred        libnsl.so.1
ELF     7ef33000-7ef59000       Deferred        libm.so.6
ELF     7ef59000-7f000000       Deferred        ntdll<elf>
  -PE  7ef70000-7f000000       \               ntdll
ELF     b7c75000-b7c7d000       Deferred        libnss_compat.so.2
ELF     b7c7e000-b7c82000       Deferred        libdl.so.2
ELF     b7c82000-b7db2000       Deferred        libc.so.6
ELF     b7db2000-b7dc9000       Deferred        libpthread.so.0
ELF     b7dd7000-b7f0d000       Export          libwine.so.1
ELF     b7f0e000-b7f2a000       Deferred        ld-linux.so.2
Threads:
process  tid      prio (all id:s are in hex)
00000008 (D) Z:\opt\Mplus_Demo\Mpdemo5.exe
        00000009    0 <==
0000000c
        00000015    0
        00000013    0
        00000012    0
        0000000e    0
        0000000d    0
0000000f
        00000016    0
        00000014    0
        00000011    0
        00000010    0
Backtrace:
=>0 0x012bb22f in mpdemo5 (+0xebb22f) (0x043694b8)
  1 0x01292eaf in mpdemo5 (+0xe92eaf) (0x04369554)
  2 0x00419cbb in mpdemo5 (+0x19cbb) (0x04369af8)
  3 0x011ec444 in mpdemo5 (+0xdec444) (0x043dfe78)
  4 0x01347885 in mpdemo5 (+0xf47885) (0x043dfeb8)
  5 0x01327cf9 in mpdemo5 (+0xf27cf9) (0x043dff08)
  6 0x7ee45947 in kernel32 (+0x55947) (0x043dffe8)
  7 0xb7ddec03 wine_switch_to_stack+0x17() in libwine.so.1 (0x00000000)

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #18 from Alex Weiss   2009-01-31 14:43:31 ---
Hi there,

I just upgraded to wine 1.1.14 and thought I would give the latest update.
Mplus 5.2 is still not working. If there's anything I can do to help the
process, let me know.

Alex

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #19 from Alex Weiss   2009-02-14 09:55:54 ---
Hello again,

I've just been upgraded to wine 1.1.15 and it still doesn't work. Below is the
output. I hope somebody can figure out why this program no longer works. It was
very useful to be able to run it under linux.

Alex

Mplus VERSION 5.2
     MUTHEN & MUTHEN

Running input file 'ex3.1.inp'...

forrtl: severe (157): Program Exception - access violation
Image              PC        Routine            Line        Source
Mplus.exe          012B9F3F  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          012933EB  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          00419CBB  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          01171E60  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          01347875  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          01327D09  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
KERNEL32.dll       7EE403E9  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #20 from Alex Weiss   2009-03-01 09:35:22 ---
Hi,

Just upgraded to 1.1.16 and the problem has not been resolved yet. I haven't
seen much on this thread so far. Hopefully this will change in the near future.

Best,

Alex

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

daniel  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #21 from daniel   2009-04-28 03:42:47 ---
I have the same problem with Mplus 5.2, updated from Wine 1.0.1 to 1.1.20;
still the same error:

forrtl: severe (157): Program Exception - access violation
Image              PC        Routine            Line        Source             
Mplus.exe          012B9F3F  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          012933EB  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          00419CBB  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          01171E60  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          01347875  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          01327D09  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
KERNEL32.dll       7B878828  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #22 from Austin English   2009-10-29 15:26:02 ---
Is this still an issue in current (1.1.32 or newer) wine?

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #23 from Alex Weiss   2009-10-29 15:36:59 ---
Sorry I've not been around much lately, but, yes, it's still a problem, even
with the newest version.

Best,

Alex

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work under wine

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #24 from daniel   2009-10-29 16:06:23 ---
'Fraid so: running wine-1.1.32 I get:

Mplus VERSION 5.2
     MUTHEN & MUTHEN

Running input file 'patents.inp'...

forrtl: severe (157): Program Exception - access violation
Image              PC        Routine            Line        Source             
Mplus.exe          012B9F3F  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          012933EB  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          00419CBB  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          01171E60  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          01347875  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
Mplus.exe          01327D09  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
KERNEL32.dll       7B877315  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
ntdll.dll          7BC6CF04  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
ntdll.dll          7BC6D120  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown
ntdll.dll          7BC4A57A  Unknown               Unknown  Unknown

Stack trace terminated abnormally.

(In reply to comment #22)
> Is this still an issue in current (1.1.32 or newer) wine?

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

Dmitry Timoshkov  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|New version of Mplus (5.2)  |New version of Mplus (5.2)
                   |does not work under wine    |does not work

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

Mikko Rönkkö  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #25 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-14 04:59:19 ---
*** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. ***

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

Mikko Rönkkö  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #26 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-14 07:36:40 ---
I have Mplus 6 and the same problem with wine 1.1.44

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #27 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-14 07:43:02 ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> I have Mplus 6 and the same problem with wine 1.1.44

I am running Wine on OS X 10.6

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #28 from Alex Weiss   2010-06-14 07:50:53 ---
Hi,

I tried running Mplus 6 under wine 1.2-rc2 and can confirm that it does not
work. I am running wine under gentoo linux.

Best,

Alex

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #29 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-14 12:28:49 ---
This bug can be reproduced with the demo version of mplus.

Here is how to reproduce:

cd /tmp/
wget http://www.statmodel.com/download/mpdzip.exe
wine mpdzip.exe

(click through the installer)

cd ~/.wine/drive_c/Program\ Files/Mplus\ Demo/
touch test.inp
wine Mpdemo6.exe test.inp

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #30 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-14 12:46:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=28831)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=28831)
winedbg output wine 1.1.42 on linux

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

Austin English  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |download
                URL|                            |http://www.statmodel.com/do
                   |                            |wnload/mpdzip.exe

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #31 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-14 13:53:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=28833)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=28833)
winedbg output with wine 1.2rc3 on OS X

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #32 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-14 14:28:37 ---
Also reported in CrossOver tracker
http://www.codeweavers.com/support/tickets/browse/?ticket_id=803782

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #33 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-14 15:04:12 ---
I also have Mplus 5.1 on this computer and it works flawlessly. If it helps, I
can run tests with this version as well. There should not be much difference in
the basic functionality.

Also, it is probably worth noting that the demo and full versions crash a bit
differently

Mplus VERSION 6 DEMO
     MUTHEN & MUTHEN

Running input file '../Mplus/Mplus Examples/User's Guide
Examples/ex3.1.inp'...

wine: Unhandled page fault on write access to 0x7b8372a0 at address 0x143f151
(thread 0009), starting debugger...
Unhandled exception: page fault on write access to 0x7b8372a0, invalid program
stack in 32-bit code (0x0143f151).

Mplus VERSION 6
     MUTHEN & MUTHEN

Running input file 'Mplus Examples/User's Guide Examples/ex3.1.inp'...

forrtl: severe (157): Program Exception - access violation

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #34 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-18 07:53:43 ---
I did some testing and this seems to be related to file writing. The software
opens a file for output, but seems to crash when it tries to write to this
file.

I am attaching results of running the 5.1 and 6 versions of the software with
WINEDEBUG=+relay

The 6.0 version first prints six lines to screen and then crashes when it tries
to write to the output file. I assume that these 7 lines are 6 lines to stdout
and one failed write attempt to the results file.

0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000008,04597808,00000002,045195a0,00000000)
ret=01444789
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000008,04597808,00000016,045195a0,00000000)
ret=01444789
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000008,04597808,00000016,045195a0,00000000)
ret=01444789
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000008,04597808,00000002,045195a0,00000000)
ret=01444789
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000008,04597808,00000027,04519580,00000000)
ret=01444789
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000008,04597808,00000002,04519580,00000000)
ret=01444789
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000000c,04517be0,000003ab,04517bc0,00000000)
ret=014b96ce

The 5.1 version prints first 6 lines of header and 1 error message line to
stdout and 22 lines to the results file.

0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000008,042a7950,00000002,04229954,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000008,042a7950,00000018,04229954,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000008,042a7950,00000016,04229954,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000008,042a7950,00000027,04229934,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000008,042a7950,00000002,04229934,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000013,04229514,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000011,04229524,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000016,04229514,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000002,042291b4,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000014,04229144,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000002,042291b4,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000002,042291b4,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000058,042b0100,0000005c,04198844,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000058,042b0100,0000005e,04198844,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000058,042b0100,0000005e,04198844,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,0000001b,04199334,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000045,04199334,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000014,04199334,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(00000008,042a7950,0000002d,04199434,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000002,041992b4,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000002,041992b4,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000011,04199204,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000012,04199204,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000018,04199204,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000002,041992b4,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000015,04199204,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000015,04199204,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000018,04199204,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000020,04199204,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000002,041992b4,00000000)
ret=011c5749
0009:Call KERNEL32.WriteFile(0000003c,042abdc0,00000029,04199204,00000000)
ret=011c5749

The one error line in the 5.1 output is due to using empty analysis file and is
part of the correct behavior of the software.

Since the error occurs during writing of the results file header, which is
unrelated to the analysis results, my guess is that the bug is related to file
writing.

The proper component for this is probably NTDLL, but I could be wrong.

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #35 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-18 08:03:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=28931)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=28931)
Two log files: Mplus 5.1 and Mplus 6.0 with WINEDEBUG=+relay

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #36 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-18 08:45:53 ---
The last working demo is available at
http://web.archive.org/web/20070815185508/http://www.statmodel.com/download/...

I added the debug runs with this version and the most up to date demo version.
(http://www.statmodel.com/download/mpdzip.exe)

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

Mikko Rönkkö  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #28931|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #37 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-18 08:49:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=28932)
 --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=28932)
Four log files with WINEDEBUG=+relay: (Mplus 4.1 demo, Mplus 6.0 demo, Mplus
5.1 full, Mplus 6.0 full)

Two log files where older versions of Mplus run correctly and Two log files
where the latest version fails.

These are run against Wine compiled from git version.

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #38 from Louis Lenders   2010-06-18 09:02:59 ---
I gave this app a try, and the version from
http://www.statmodel.com/download/mpdzip.exe starts fine here. Is that the
version that crashes for you ?

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #39 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-18 10:46:53 ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> I gave this app a try, and the version from
> http://www.statmodel.com/download/mpdzip.exe starts fine here. Is that the
> version that crashes for you ?

mpdzip.exe is the installer

You can get the crash by following the instructions in comment # 29

[Bug 16471] New version of Mplus (5.2) does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #40 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-28 08:30:40 ---
I emailed the Mplus developers and asked a few questions about the licenses and
possibility to let Wine developers have access to a licensed copy of Mplus.

If it helps in fixing wine, I got a permission to give a wine developer access
to my copy of Mplus 5.1 (which works flawlessly). Please drop me an email to
[e-mail], if this would help.

How can I change the component of this bug to NTDLL?

[Bug 16471] Mplus 5.2 does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

Wylda  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]
            Summary|New version of Mplus (5.2)  |Mplus 5.2 does not work
                   |does not work               |

[Bug 16471] Mplus 5.2 does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #41 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-06-29 04:54:44 ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> I emailed the Mplus developers and asked a few questions about the licenses and
> possibility to let Wine developers have access to a licensed copy of Mplus.

I have a test case using four different versions of Mplus ready. Also, I got a
permission from Mplus developers to give this test case that contains two full
versions of Mplus for Wine developers if that helps in fixing the issue
discussed in this bug report. If any developer is interested in taking a look,
you can email me and then I can transfer the test case over.

[Bug 16471] Mplus 5.2 does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #42 from Mikko Rönkkö   2010-07-19 05:37:42 ---
I just tested 1.2 and the bug is still present. Also, it seem that also another
software has a similar issue

http://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?p=39929&sid=1add35cab7400e50c9f914...

[Bug 16471] Mplus 5.2 does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

--- Comment #43 from Mikko Rönkkö  2010-10-24 07:17:18 CDT ---
This is not directly related to this bug, but it seems that Mplus 6.1 works
under Wine.

[Bug 16471] Mplus 5.2 does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

Bruno Jesus  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|download                    |
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #44 from Bruno Jesus  2012-03-05 20:59:27 CST ---
Unfortunately the 5.2 version is no longer available, and the newer version 6
works in wine.

Can anyone provide a legal link to a demo version of 5.2?

Is this still a problem in latest wine version?

[Bug 16471] Mplus 5.2 does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

Bruno Jesus  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |ABANDONED

--- Comment #45 from Bruno Jesus  2012-10-31 09:28:06 CDT ---
Over 6 months without answer, no download, resolving abandoned. If anyone is
still able to reproduce feel free to reopen.

[Bug 16471] Mplus 5.2 does not work

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16471

Austin English  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--- Comment #46 from Austin English  2012-10-31 14:53:30 CDT ---
Closing.