http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
Summary: Please provide single login for all websites of winehq.org portal. Product: WineHQ.org Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: www-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: yurikoles@gmail.com
For every website users must create new account. I think it's really annoying.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
Yuriy Kolesnikov yurikoles@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yurikoles@gmail.com Platform|PC |All Difficulty|--- |Days
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
Jeff Zaroyko jeffz@jeffz.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 |P2 CC|yurikoles@gmail.com | Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #1 from Jeff Zaroyko jeffz@jeffz.name 2009-07-20 05:36:16 --- I don't see why this is major. It's a one time only thing and most browsers will save your password if you let them. Making a single login seems like unnecessary work. As the reporter you are already cc'd on changes, no need to add yourself.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|All |Other Difficulty|Days |--- OS/Version|All |other
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
--- Comment #2 from Yuriy Kolesnikov yurikoles@gmail.com 2009-07-20 05:58:54 --- why other platform?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-20 06:37:15 --- (In reply to comment #2)
why other platform?
Then specify your one, you definitely haven't tested an all of them.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
--- Comment #4 from Yuriy Kolesnikov yurikoles@gmail.com 2009-07-20 06:41:50 --- Site login is platform-depended? Do not make laugh my slippers.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
--- Comment #5 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2009-07-20 06:51:13 --- (In reply to comment #4)
Site login is platform-depended?
That's a common thing for all bug reports to not assume that everyone else (including your slippers) has the same problem, and limit the report to your own configuration.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #6 from Vitaliy Margolen vitaliy@kievinfo.com 2009-07-20 08:10:06 --- I personally do not want to have the same logon on appdb, forum, bugzilla, wiki.
Combining AppDB & forum login seems more useful then giving all forum users bugzilla account.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
HennR hennr@hennr.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hennr@hennr.name
--- Comment #7 from HennR hennr@hennr.name 2011-02-05 16:09:38 CST --- I really would like to have a single sign on for all winehq.org services like bugzilla, forum, appdb and the wiki.
It would be so much more convenient and less confusing than the current procedure.
Also I don't think that it will hurt if everybody gets a bugzilla account, most of the user will not use it anyway, what's the problem with that?
Well, if anyone starts this project please leave a note here.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
Kyle Auble randomidman48@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |randomidman48@yahoo.com
--- Comment #8 from Kyle Auble randomidman48@yahoo.com 2012-09-27 22:24:52 CDT --- Sometime in the next few months, I plan to test moving WineHQ onto various frameworks and CMSes. I think SSO is a basic feature that comes with most of them so this should naturally follow.
Since opinions about SSO seem to be mixed, perhaps we could have a compromise? While it may not be a default feature, I would think we could define one ID for each account across all services, but only activate it for a specific service when the account holder requests. If there's demand for it, we could even allow people to define service-specific "aliases" and passwords if they want to actively opt out of SSO.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dank@kegel.com
--- Comment #9 from Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com 2012-09-28 00:49:50 CDT --- I doubt we have to worry about that too much. Full on SSO is what people expect these days, isn't it?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
Kyle Auble randomidman48@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|randomidman48@yahoo.com |
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shatteredlites@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net 2013-09-11 20:02:54 CDT --- *** Bug 34492 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
--- Comment #11 from shatteredlites@gmail.com 2013-09-11 21:09:40 CDT --- @Kyle Auble sounds like a plan ^^
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
mintos@discard.email mintos@discard.email changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mintos@discard.email
--- Comment #12 from mintos@discard.email mintos@discard.email --- has there been any progress?
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
Jeremy Newman jnewman@codeweavers.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jnewman@codeweavers.com
--- Comment #13 from Jeremy Newman jnewman@codeweavers.com --- (In reply to mintos@discard.email from comment #12)
has there been any progress?
No. Doing this requires patching and maintaining multiple codebases in multiple languages. Leaning one codebase is challenging enough. 4 different sites (Bugs, Forums, Wiki, AppDB) is a huge undertaking since they all have their own way of managing users.
The amount of work far outweighs any annoyance level.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
Bart bart-wa@tushmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bart-wa@tushmail.com
--- Comment #14 from Bart bart-wa@tushmail.com --- The last post here is more than three years ago, and I hope I still have something useful to add.
I recently started using Wine and to be honest, I'm really happy with it.
There's probably a lot of work to do and I was checking if I can also contribute. I was also surprised that I had to create a separate logon for Bugs, Forums, Wiki, and AppDB.
With different organizations I have more than 600 profiles. If I had to make four separate IDs with each, that would have been 2400 profiles total.
I understand that it can be a challenge to combine the logon ID's for 4 different sites, while there's probably lots of other work waiting, but could the user have a remark on the screen when trying to logon or when trying to make an ID that a separate logon ID is needed for each?
The more accessible the Wine websites are for new users, the higher the chance that Wine can welcome new volunteers. ;-)
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
Anya animegirl@stronzi.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |animegirl@stronzi.org
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19386
soredake broaden_acid002@simplelogin.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|broaden_acid002@simplelogin | |.com |
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org -
WineHQ Bugzilla