http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
Summary: graphic glitches in wine-1.2-rc5 Product: Wine Version: 1.2-rc5 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs@winehq.org ReportedBy: toralf.foerster@gmx.de
Hello,
the corners of Lotus Notes buttons are looking a little bit wired with that version, or ?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
--- Comment #1 from Toralf Förster toralf.foerster@gmx.de 2010-06-28 09:11:48 --- Created an attachment (id=29212) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=29212) screen shot
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
Wylda wylda@volny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wylda@volny.cz Summary|graphic glitches in |Lotus Notes buttons have |wine-1.2-rc5 |graphic glitches
--- Comment #2 from Wylda wylda@volny.cz 2010-06-28 09:16:25 ---
Did this work before? If yes, which wine version? Is there download available?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
--- Comment #3 from Toralf Förster toralf.foerster@gmx.de 2010-06-28 09:53:43 --- 1.2-rc3 worked fine IIRC. In the mean time however I updated x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.11 to x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.12 and x11-libs/libdrm-2.4.20 to x11-libs/libdrm-2.4.21 ...
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
--- Comment #4 from Wylda wylda@volny.cz 2010-06-28 10:01:34 ---
Then it shouln't be a problem for you to go back to wine-1.2-rc3 and see if the problem is still there or if that is broken by intel.
Also there is lot of Lotus Notes versions. Could you specify Lotus' version bit closer and make link between AppDB and this bug report?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
Toralf Förster toralf.foerster@gmx.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from Toralf Förster toralf.foerster@gmx.de 2010-06-28 11:21:12 --- damn - it is the intel driver.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
Wylda wylda@volny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #6 from Wylda wylda@volny.cz 2010-06-28 11:26:44 ---
Thank you for retest. Closing...
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
--- Comment #7 from Toralf Förster toralf.foerster@gmx.de 2010-06-28 15:04:21 --- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28798#c2 ?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
Toralf Förster toralf.foerster@gmx.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |https://bugs.freedesktop.or | |g/show_bug.cgi?id=28798
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
Toralf Förster toralf.foerster@gmx.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID |
--- Comment #8 from Toralf Förster toralf.foerster@gmx.de 2010-06-29 10:33:23 --- reopened due to comment from xorg-driver people.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
Juan Lang juan_lang@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #9 from Juan Lang juan_lang@yahoo.com 2010-06-29 12:03:59 --- I don't think name calling is a proper response. Since the change was in the Intel driver, I'm resolving this invalid again. Please try to get a more detailed response before reopening. In particular, what is Wine doing wrong?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED
--- Comment #10 from Nikolay Sivov bunglehead@gmail.com 2010-06-29 13:13:40 --- Closing.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
--- Comment #11 from Toralf Förster toralf.foerster@gmx.de 2010-11-04 05:27:06 CDT --- I asked the freedesktop people 2 times to give a serious answwr :
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28798#c4
however w/o success.
Nevertheless I'm wondering whether it is the right way to close this bug as invalid - b/c independent from the will of the free desktop people the issue itself does still exists (although the root cause is subject of discussion), isn't it ?
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
--- Comment #12 from Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@codeweavers.com 2010-11-04 05:38:42 CDT --- You could try to preform a regression test on the Intel driver code base, and see if that gets more attention from its developers. Obviously nothing has changed in Wine, or at least there is no any insight that it's a Wine bug.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
Jaime Rave jaimerave@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jaimerave@gmail.com
--- Comment #13 from Jaime Rave jaimerave@gmail.com 2010-11-04 11:36:17 CDT --- This looks like bug 23098, and also i have opened a bug on freedesktop https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30157 but no response since then.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23424
--- Comment #14 from Toralf Förster toralf.foerster@gmx.de 2011-01-03 03:49:51 CST --- Yep, this helps : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30157#c4
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org