https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42232
Bug ID: 42232 Summary: Sort version list by version number Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 URL: https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=appl ication&iId=13986 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: appdb-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs@winehq.org Reporter: cges30901@gmail.com Distribution: ---
Versions of LINE (Powered by Naver) is not sorted correctly. Version 4.10.x.x and 4.11.x.x is not at the bottom of the list. I guess this is because '1' in 10 is less than '3'?
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42232
Robert Walker bob.mt.wya@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bob.mt.wya@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Robert Walker bob.mt.wya@gmail.com --- Yeah, one of the applications I maintain (DVDFab) has now reached 10.x. This version gets put before the other versions (3-9). See: https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=4356
I've already had a user submitting a duplicate version 10 today - for DVDFab... Presumably because the version ordering is very counter-intuitive.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42232
--- Comment #2 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net --- There's really no way to fix this globally because version numbering schemes are not consistent across apps, and sometimes not even consistent within apps (e.g., Microsoft Office). Plus there are the inconsistencies created by different users in the way they enter the version info in the first place.
Maintainers could probably force a correct sort in many cases by adding a 0 before single-digit numbers, but then (strictly speaking) the version number would no longer be correct.
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42232
faalagorn@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |faalagorn@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from faalagorn@gmail.com --- It would be nice if there would be a new functionality added, allowing to set the order of the versions manually, either visually via drag and drop or by adding a numerical ID for the versions or a hidden sort key, akin to Wikipedia's hidden sort key ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Hidden_sort_key ). Alternatively another field could be added that also allows to set the date/time for each version release and then sort by that.
The automated solution will always fail as there are different numbering schemes, so I wouldn't stretch myself on that.
Alternatively, it would be at least nice to separate the obsolete versions out of the current ones – currently this functionality is only used for votes merging.
My post about this issue here: https://forum.winehq.org/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=29709&p=112880
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42232
Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shoefish@gmail.com
--- Comment #4 from Rosanne DiMesio dimesio@earthlink.net --- *** Bug 45340 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42232
Ken Sharp imwellcushtymelike@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #5 from Ken Sharp imwellcushtymelike@gmail.com --- Confirming
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42232
Ori Avtalion ori@avtalion.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ori@avtalion.name
-
wine-bugs＠winehq.org -
WineHQ Bugzilla