ChangeSet ID: 21719
CVSROOT: /opt/cvs-commit
Module name: lostwages
Changes by: jnewman(a)winehq.org 2005/12/07 11:25:40
Modified files:
wwn : wn20051202_300.xml
Log message:
Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr>
Spelling fixes.
Patch: http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=21719
Old revision New revision Changes Path
1.2 1.3 +5 -5 lostwages/wwn/wn20051202_300.xml
Index: lostwages/wwn/wn20051202_300.xml
diff -u -p lostwages/wwn/wn20051202_300.xml:1.2 lostwages/wwn/wn20051202_300.xml:1.3
--- lostwages/wwn/wn20051202_300.xml:1.2 7 Dec 2005 17:25:40 -0000
+++ lostwages/wwn/wn20051202_300.xml 7 Dec 2005 17:25:40 -0000
@@ -182,16 +182,16 @@ and would be shared by all, applications
various glX revisions (recently discussed glx 1.2, 1.3, etc) would also be
localized to a single dll.
</p><p>
-Of course, on the down side, we take a hit of one extra layer of indirection by
+Of course, on the downside, we take a hit of one extra layer of indirection by
going through WGL. However as WGL/glX functions are rarely called, this should
be a minimal of a performance hit.
</p><p>
-All in all I think it would be worth while, but I'd still like to hear from
+All in all I think it would be worthwhile, but I'd still like to hear from
others so as not to waste (a lot!) of my time.</p></quote>
<p>Oliver Stieber wrote back:</p>
<quote who="Oliver Stieber"><p>
-If wines WGL implementation is fully implemented then it may be a good idea
+If wine's WGL implementation is fully implemented then it may be a good idea
switching to wgl, a wgl implemenatation would also make debugging much easier
because wined3d can be run under windows to isolate problems.
</p><p>
@@ -408,11 +408,11 @@ Wine and try to fix it.</li></ol>
>
<topic>Web/HTML</topic>
<p>The Mozilla ActiveX control is currently used when an application
-requires a <tt>WebBrowser</tt> control to embed OLE documnents, namely HTML,
+requires a <tt>WebBrowser</tt> control to embed OLE documents, namely HTML,
within an application. Ongoing work by Jacek Caban to implement
MSHTML.DLL and SHDOCVW.DLL will hopefully obviate the need for it, but
that work isn't complete enough yet (although Jacek sent about a
-bizillion patches last week.) That led David Hagood to ask this week:</p>
+bazillion patches last week.) That led David Hagood to ask this week:</p>
<quote who="David Hagood"><p>
Does the Windows version of Mozilla need to be in place for the Mozilla
Active X control to work, or is there a way to point the control at my