Detlef Riekenberg : localspl: Add a comment, why we do not implement AddPort for XcvDataPort.

[Alexandre Julliard]

Module: wine
Branch: master
Commit: 6630439f86520e3d279b2e8bdb8719487d3d0e19
URL:    http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=6630439f86520e3d279b2e8bdb...

Author: Detlef Riekenberg 
Date:   Thu Mar 15 23:03:33 2007 +0100

localspl: Add a comment, why we do not implement AddPort for XcvDataPort.

---

dlls/localspl/localmon.c |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dlls/localspl/localmon.c b/dlls/localspl/localmon.c
index c98611d..7e13ace 100644
--- a/dlls/localspl/localmon.c
+++ b/dlls/localspl/localmon.c
@@ -459,6 +459,9 @@ DWORD WINAPI localmon_XcvDataPort(HANDLE hXcv, LPCWSTR pszDataName, PBYTE pInput
     TRACE("(%p, %s, %p, %d, %p, %d, %p)\n", hXcv, debugstr_w(pszDataName),
           pInputData, cbInputData, pOutputData, cbOutputData, pcbOutputNeeded);

+    /* Native localspl.dll crashes on w2k and xp, when XcvDataPort is called
+       with "AddPort" as command. We do not need to implement this */
+
     if (!lstrcmpW(pszDataName, cmd_ConfigureLPTPortCommandOKW)) {
         TRACE("InputData (%d): %s\n", cbInputData, debugstr_w( (LPWSTR) pInputData));
         res = RegCreateKeyW(HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, WinNT_CV_WindowsW, &hroot);