lostwages/wwn wn20051223_302.xml

[WineHQ]

ChangeSet ID:	21961
CVSROOT:	/opt/cvs-commit
Module name:	lostwages
Changes by:	[e-mail]	2005/12/24 01:39:43

Modified files:
    wwn            : wn20051223_302.xml

Log message:
    fixups in WWN #302

Patch: http://cvs.winehq.org/patch.py?id=21961

Old revision  New revision  Changes     Path
 1.1           1.2           +10 -8      lostwages/wwn/wn20051223_302.xml

Index: lostwages/wwn/wn20051223_302.xml
diff -u -p lostwages/wwn/wn20051223_302.xml:1.1 lostwages/wwn/wn20051223_302.xml:1.2
--- lostwages/wwn/wn20051223_302.xml:1.1	24 Dec 2005  7:39:43 -0000
+++ lostwages/wwn/wn20051223_302.xml	24 Dec 2005  7:39:43 -0000
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ going to beta without  any real attempt 
 freeze release cycle is not a good thing. At the very minimum I would
 think that we should know when the releases are going to happen but we
 do not even know that.
-<Rant>
+</Rant>
 </p></quote>

<p>Alexandre replied:</p>
@@ -261,12 +261,12 @@ and <a href="http://bugs.winehq.org">Bug
 and report problems.</p>
 </section>
 <section 
-	title=""
-	subject=""
-	archive="http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-devel/2005-October/.html"
-	posts=""
+	title="OSDL Desktop Summit"
+	subject="[Desktop_architects] Portland, a w(h)iney comment"
+	archive="http://lists.osdl.org/pipermail/desktop_architects/2005-December/000354.html"
+	posts="1"
>

-<topic></topic>
+<topic>Project Management</topic>
 <p>We mentioned a few weeks ago (WWN
 <a href="http://www.winehq.com/?issue=299#Desktop%20Summit">#299</a>) there
 was a desktop summit being sponsored by OSDL.  Well, Jeremy White and Dan
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ and PageMaker.
 </p><p>
 No one seems to care that Wine runs 3 of those 4.
 </p><p>
-&lt;Rodney Dangerfield&gt;    We get no respect!   &lt;Rodney Dangerfield&gt;
+&lt;Rodney Dangerfield&gt;    We get no respect!   &lt;/Rodney Dangerfield&gt;
 </p><p>
 &lt;grin&gt;
 </p><p>
@@ -473,7 +473,9 @@ lines of code.</p></quote>

<p>Aric looked into it and noticed on SpecOps' 
 <a href="http://www.specopslabs.com/partners-stratigicpartners.htm"><i>Partners</i></a>
-page that IBM and TurboLinux were both listed.</p>
+page that IBM and TurboLinux were both listed.  Given their long history with
+the community, presumably both of those companies would want to make sure the 
+licensing was followed.</p>

<p>So, anyone out there have TurboLinux FUJI?  Do you have the source
 code changes to Wine?</p>