wine-devel April 2001

51 participants
93 discussions

Re: debugger startup
by gerard patel 08 Apr '01

08 Apr '01

At 06:32 PM 07/04/2001 +0200, you wrote: <snip> >the setup was that the AeDebug registry key pointed to a shell script, >which in turn, >launched the real debugger (used to set up different context options, >and such) ah that was the problem ? from the bug reports on the news group I had the idea that the key was just not initialized. <snip> >either we decide that shell scripts shouldn't be used (easy solution) The script has an utility, no ? I don't know what it's doing, is the goal to configure the debugger options ? (if yes, maybe using an environment variable could give the same result ??) Gerard

1 0

Re: RegSetValueEx problem?
by davep 08 Apr '01

08 Apr '01

On Sun, 01 Apr 2001, you wrote: > At 01:59 PM 31/03/2001 +0100, you wrote: > > <snip> > >Compiling and running Winemine under Windows 95 this problem doesn't occur. > >Win95 truncates the value at the first null. > > Under NT4 SP6, if I write (for example) '47' + 0 + 13 bytes of garbage, I get > exactly that when querying with the same buffer length (16). > If I use a longer buffer, one binary 0 is appended. > If I use a shorter buffer, nothing is copied and the function does not succeed > (ERROR_MORE_DATA). > > Of course under Regedit the garbage is not displayed; regedit displays only '47' > in this case. I've found time to do some more digging, but I'm still stumped. This is the trace from WineMine saving one parameter in the registry (-debugmsg +relay,+reg): Call advapi32.248: RegSetValueExA(00000038,4038cae0 "Xpos",00000000,00000001,405e66a0,00000010) ret=40388dc8 fs=008f Call kernel32.643: MultiByteToWideChar(00000000,00000000,405e66a0 "3",00000010,00000000,00000000) ret=407c4fe9 fs=008f Ret kernel32.643: MultiByteToWideChar() retval=00000010 ret=407c4fe9 fs=008f Call kernel32.553: HeapAlloc(40390000,00000000,00000020) ret=407c4fff fs=008f Ret kernel32.553: HeapAlloc() retval=403d62fc ret=407c4fff fs=008f Call kernel32.643: MultiByteToWideChar(00000000,00000000,405e66a0 "3",00000010,403d62fc,00000010) ret=407c5023 fs=008f Ret kernel32.643: MultiByteToWideChar() retval=00000010 ret=407c5023 fs=008f Call ntdll.419: RtlInitAnsiString(405e658c,4038cae0 "Xpos") ret=407c5038 fs=008f Ret ntdll.419: RtlInitAnsiString() retval=00000000 ret=407c5038 fs=008f Call ntdll.281: RtlAnsiStringToUnicodeString(40113578,405e658c,00000000) ret=407c504d fs=008f Ret ntdll.281: RtlAnsiStringToUnicodeString() retval=00000000 ret=407c504d fs=008f Call ntdll.230: NtSetValueKey(00000038,40113578,00000000,00000001,403d62fc,00000020) ret=407c5067 fs=008f trace:reg:NtSetValueKey (0x38,L"Xpos",1,0x403d62fc,32) Ret ntdll.230: NtSetValueKey() retval=00000000 ret=407c5067 fs=008f Call kernel32.559: HeapFree(40390000,00000000,403d62fc) ret=407c5083 fs=008f Ret kernel32.559: HeapFree() retval=00000001 ret=407c5083 fs=008f Call ntdll.466: RtlNtStatusToDosError(00000000) ret=407c5089 fs=008f Ret ntdll.466: RtlNtStatusToDosError() retval=00000000 ret=407c5089 fs=008f Ret advapi32.248: RegSetValueExA() retval=00000000 ret=40388dc8 fs=008f So the 16-byte buffer (containing the character "3", a null, and 14 bytes of garbage) has been converted into a 32-byte unicode string and saved. Good. Inside the registry this looks like: "Xpos"="3\0\0\0`\x00ca7@\0\0\0\0\0\0\0@" Now if we read that value back in this is what happens: Call advapi32.236: RegQueryValueExA(00000034,4038cae0 "Xpos",00000000,405e6970,405e697c,405e6974) ret=40388a38 fs=008f trace:reg:RegQueryValueExA (0x34,"Xpos",(nil),0x405e6970,0x405e697c,0x405e6974=16) Call ntdll.419: RtlInitAnsiString(405e6764,4038cae0 "Xpos") ret=407c5565 fs=008f Ret ntdll.419: RtlInitAnsiString() retval=00000000 ret=407c5565 fs=008f Call ntdll.281: RtlAnsiStringToUnicodeString(40113578,405e6764,00000000) ret=407c557a fs=008f Ret ntdll.281: RtlAnsiStringToUnicodeString() retval=00000000 ret=407c557a fs=008f Call ntdll.177: NtQueryValueKey(00000034,40113578,00000002,405e676c,00000100,405e6760) ret=407c55b0 fs=008f trace:reg:NtQueryValueKey (0x34,L"Xpos",2,0x405e676c,256) Ret ntdll.177: NtQueryValueKey() retval=00000000 ret=407c55b0 fs=008f Call kernel32.889: WideCharToMultiByte(00000000,00000000,405e6778 L"3",00000011,00000000,00000000,00000000,00000000) ret=407c56c9 fs=008f Ret kernel32.889: WideCharToMultiByte() retval=00000011 ret=407c56c9 fs=008f Call ntdll.466: RtlNtStatusToDosError(80000005) ret=407c57be fs=008f Ret ntdll.466: RtlNtStatusToDosError() retval=000000ea ret=407c57be fs=008f Ret advapi32.236: RegQueryValueExA() retval=000000ea ret=40388a38 fs=008f RegQueryValueEx maintains that there are 17 characters and since they won't fit in the buffer the function aborts. Incidentally, the "null-terminate if the user forgot" trick is carried out both in RegSetValueEx *and* RegQueryValueEx. Would not once be enough? -- Dave Pickles

1 0

debugger startup
by eric pouech 07 Apr '01

07 Apr '01

someone (IIRC Gérard) had issues when starting the debugger when an exception occured. the setup was that the AeDebug registry key pointed to a shell script, which in turn, launched the real debugger (used to set up different context options, and such) however, what happens is: - the main program (the one generating the exception) tries to launch the debugger using the AeDebug - the process creation forks, and exec:s the debugger program - at the unix level, the debugged program starts, which runs the shell script, which then starts the debugger - at the windows level, since the shell script isn't a Wine process, the call fails (even if an Unix process is created) - the exception handler then reports the error in process creation and stops the main program, whereas the debugger has been started for this program either we decide that shell scripts shouldn't be used (easy solution) or we could do something like : - if the CreateProcess fails, then wait for a certain amount of time. If after that time the current process isn't currently debugged, then report the error. Otherwise assume what did happen is what has been described above comments are welcome A+ -- --------------- Eric Pouech (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.pouech/) "The future will be better tomorrow", Vice President Dan Quayle

1 0

Re: [PATCH] deferred trace
by Alexandre Julliard 07 Apr '01

07 Apr '01

eric pouech <eric.pouech(a)wanadoo.fr> writes: > using the Wine debugger (or any program using the debugging API) may > have some drawbacks. As the API is designed, it's not possible to > get control of the debugged program between its creation and its > entry point entering this makes very difficult to let the Wine > debugger trigger the expected features by poking the memory in the > debuggee. That's not exactly correct, the debugger can intercept the dll loads and break in the dll init code. Since with dll separation all Wine inits will be done inside dlls, the debugger should be able to intercept everything from the point we connect to the wineserver. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

2 1

Re: Nasty Wine/kernel bug, anyone?
by Ulrich Weigand 06 Apr '01

06 Apr '01

> If I were going to make more WAGs (Wild Assed guesses), > I'd hazard a guess that this was due to my Alsa sound system > (running on the AC97 codec on my Asus motherboard). > > I tried to walk the stack back, but didn't get very far > (after the first time of wrongly computing the hex offset > from a .s file, I gave off, stomped off to look > for a better disassembler and gave up). If you have the 'vmlinux' file, try objdump --disassemble vmlinux > My best guess is that we're coming through dentry_open > (xc012e7fe)/ chrdev_open (0xc012f66c) > /soundcore_open (0xc01bbf71). However, I wasn't > seeing a familiar EBP/EIP pattern, so I'm possibly just > pulling random symbols out of the air. Yes, this appears to the proper trace: c0108d7f system_call c012ea2c sys_open c012e732 filp_open c012e7fe dentry_open c012f66c chrdev_open c01bbf71 soundcore_open d0826a42 <module> d087ce3e <module> c0107aa4 __down_failed c010794f __down ........ schedule [I am assuming that you have 256MB main memory. Correct?] Now, the question is still, who is sleeping on that semaphore and why? >From the call trace, it would seem that some sound-related module is loaded, which does a down() on some semaphore in its open() routine. We even know which semaphore: cff267ac. (This does not help much, as this is would appear to be somewhere in kmalloc()ed memory ...) We can continue to track in two directions. First, we can try to locate the point within the Wine application where the open() syscall is performed. >From the trace we see that the system call instruction is located at 40303a24, and the stack pointer points to 405c6638. The system call itself is an open( 41610240, O_WRONLY|O_NDELAY ) [The stack pointer value is rather weird, I'd say ...] This particular open mode occurs in the Wine source only in dlls/winmm/wineoss/audio.c, which confirms the sound hypothesis. The next time you reproduce the bug, could you please add the output of /proc/<pid>/maps for the hanging Wine process? This way, we could further analyse these pointers to Wine user space ... The more promising way to track the problem, however, is to find out which module those d* addresses above reside in. If the modules are still loaded, the output of /proc/ksyms should at least give a hint. For a more refined symbol lookup, it is best to use the 'ksymoops' tool, which correlates the /proc/ksyms output with the ELF symbols read from the object modules themselves. To do so, write this: Call Trace: [<d0826a42>] [<d087ce3e>] to a file and pipe the file through ksymoops. In any case, this would seem to be clearly a bug in that sound module. I don't know, however, why only Wine would trigger that bug ... Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand weigand(a)informatik.uni-erlangen.de

2 1

Re: [PATCH] Name Thread Exception support in Wine debugger
by eric pouech 06 Apr '01

06 Apr '01

James Hatheway wrote: > > Hi guys, > > As I mentioned in an earlier email to the Devel mailing list, I discovered the > application I am supporting started raising more exceptions than usual. These > turned out to be an undocumented signal to the MS VC6 debugger to name the > current thread. You can read more about this at: > http://www.vcdj.com/upload/free/features/vcdj/2001/03mar01/et0103/et0103.asp > or searching google.com or deja.com for "0x406D1388". This patch fixes > the WINE debugger to handle this exception, just like MS VC6 debugger does. something seems wrong in your patch... the szName field from the exception field is never copied from the debugged program space to the debugger space (only the address is) so, you should use ReadProcessMemory instead (something like ReadProcessMemory(pThread->name, sizeof(pThread->name), DEBUG_CurrThread->process->handle, pThreadName->szName); ) also, I don't like the fact that you put the #define in a public header file and the exception struct definition inside the file it would make more sense to me if both were either public or private (I'd go for private, since those values don't seem to be defined in Windows' standard headers) A+ -- --------------- Eric Pouech (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.pouech/) "The future will be better tomorrow", Vice President Dan Quayle

2 1

WWN
by eric pouech 06 Apr '01

06 Apr '01

for personal reasons, I will no longer be able to write the WWN (and I haven't in the last couple of weeks) so, if someone wishes to take the job over, I'd be happy to help him (her) to set it up A+ -- --------------- Eric Pouech (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.pouech/) "The future will be better tomorrow", Vice President Dan Quayle

1 0

Re: [PATCH] deferred trace
by gerard patel 06 Apr '01

06 Apr '01

At 03:00 PM 14/03/2001 -0800, you wrote: <snip> >that the wine debugger can resolve, it is possible to meet the needs that >have been expressed. Expressed ? What I wanted is something short and simple, so I could help people on the news group. The use of my patch could be explained in *one* line and it would have worked with Wine right 'out of the box' :-)... something the internal debugger does not do anymore since a long time. I am afraid that this thing will be more complex to setup and to use that the debugger - something already too complex for many people. And well, I almost never use the debugger myself because it crashes at the slightest provocation so I don't feel much about saying people to use it. So in short, after all my 'needs' (helping ppl on the news group) are indeed specific :-) Gerard

2 1

Re: Make PostScript driver less loquacious
by Dmitry Timoshkov 04 Apr '01

04 Apr '01

"Ian Pilcher" <ian.pilcher(a)home.com> wrote: > dlls/wineps/init.c, ppd.c > > Change some PS driver FIXMEs/MESSAGEs to WARNs I think it's not the time to do it. Those messages/fixme's help a lot to add missing page and bin type into psdrv: they are not complete now. And without message about missing fonts in ppd/afm it would be nightmare to track down problems with ps fonts at least for me.

3 8

Newbie question...
by Elan Feingold 04 Apr '01

04 Apr '01

Hi, I have a 3rd party x86 DLL file, that I would like to use under Linux. I have read the documentation on the specmaker tool, which would seem to provide some help. The thing that makes my case a bit different is that I would like to use the DLL within a Linux native program, not a WineLib program (its just a command line application and I need it to be very lightweight). Im pretty sure the Wine code can help me out, but Im not sure what the easiest way to proceed is, and what parts I need to use. Thanks in advance, -elan

2 1

T@x2001: Linuxport via Wine
by Joerg Mayer 04 Apr '01

04 Apr '01

Just found the following at the SuSE portal pages (German only): http://portal.suse.de/de/content/reports/tax2001.html Rough translation on the introductory paragraph: The program t@x by Buhl Data has been around for the Windows platform for some years. This year, the current version T@x2001 has been made available for the Linux OS for a first time. In order to do this the Windows emulator Wine was used. Wine allows using Windows applications running Linux. This emulator has been modified to work with t@x2001. The summary as far as Wine is concerned: The program should be more stable and faster. Does anyone know which modifications were made to wine? Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer(a)loplof.de> I found out that "pro" means "instead of" (as in proconsul). Now I know what proactive means.

1 0

Re: Interesting Magic # exception understood by the MS debugger...
by Alexandre Julliard 03 Apr '01

03 Apr '01

"James Hatheway" <james(a)macadamian.com> writes: > OK, I don't know too much about the internals of the WINE debugger, so > here goes. Is there a field for this already, or should I make a new > field in DBG_THREAD structure? (I think that seems like the right place > for it) Yep, you can add a field there. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

1 0

Re: Interesting Magic # exception understood by the MS debugger...
by Alexandre Julliard 03 Apr '01

03 Apr '01

"James Hatheway" <james(a)macadamian.com> writes: > For now, I put the little hack I attached to this mail in my tree to > save my sanity. My question to the list is, (A) is there a way to name > threads in Linux/Unix (I don't think so, but of course I could be wrong) No, and we don't need that. > and (B) should we support MS's hack somehow in the official tree? Yes, in the Wine debugger, which should store the name and simply continue execution, just like the MSVC debugger does. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

2 1

Re: Speeding up wineserver syncronization objects with shared memory
by David Howells 03 Apr '01

03 Apr '01

Okay, I've thought about how to make the wine kernel module easier to use for Wine, and I've started adding another API to it - one that interprets Wine server messages. When I designed the module initially, I decided to make it possible to add as many API's as I liked, so in theory it's not too difficult. I'm currently performing a major rearrangement of the files that comprise the module: * Splitting the current win32 API bits out of the same files that contain the actual object class implementations. * Putting the core and the API's in separate subdirectories. * Abstracting name support, so that the internal API takes an "object name" which the user API is responsible for extracting from userspace and converting from WCS/MBS as necessary. * Fixing introduced bugs. This does not mean that I'm getting rid of the Win32 API I've already got! It will just be optional. Calling the new API will be by means of either: union generic_request msg; syscall(__NR_win32,WINESERVER_WINE_SERVER_MESSAGE,&msg); Or: union generic_request msg; int fd = open("/proc/wineserver"); struct WineserverIoctl wioc = { WINESERVER_WINE_SERVER_MESSAGE, &msg }; ioctl(fd,WINESERVER_IOCTL,&wioc); David

1 0

Interesting Magic # exception understood by the MS debugger...
by James Hatheway 02 Apr '01

02 Apr '01

Hi guys, I encountered something interesting while debugging a newer build of my application. I noticed that all of a sudden I was receiving approximately 10 new exceptions in the debugger on startup that I wasn't receiving before. After digging a little, I found out that the app coders were making use of a 'hidden' feature of MS VC that allowed you to name your threads (thus allowing for easier debugging). To do this, you call RaiseException with the code of 0x406D1388. (Search on deja.com or google.com for "0x406D1388" for details.) The windows debugger seems to be on the lookout for this code. Of course, what it does in wine is just breaking into the debugger many times and getting on my nerves. :-) For now, I put the little hack I attached to this mail in my tree to save my sanity. My question to the list is, (A) is there a way to name threads in Linux/Unix (I don't think so, but of course I could be wrong) and (B) should we support MS's hack somehow in the official tree? -James -- James Hatheway Software Designer - Macadamian Technologies, Inc. james(a)macadamian.com ~ http://www.macadamian.com "Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier" "One could be happy if the air were as pure as the beer"

1 0

Re: RegSetValueEx problem?
by davep 02 Apr '01

02 Apr '01

1 0

Re: event flags using pipes
by Alexandre Julliard 01 Apr '01

01 Apr '01

Mike McCormack <mike_mccormack(a)looksmart.com.au> writes: > Why? By changing the client side implementation of SetEvent and > ResetEvent the use file descriptors and implementing a client side > unix fd/handle cache, it should be possible to eliminate server calls > for these operations and improve the performance of wineserver. I don't see how you can get the right semantics this way, but maybe I missed something. How will you be able to wake a single thread for auto-reset events, but all of them for manual events? How are you going to implement PulseEvent? How can you do WaitForMultipleObjects for an auto-reset event without a race? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

1 0

event flags using pipes
by Mike McCormack 01 Apr '01

01 Apr '01

Hi, i've written an implementation of windows event flags using pipes. (The modifications are confined to server/event.c for the moment.) Why? By changing the client side implementation of SetEvent and ResetEvent the use file descriptors and implementing a client side unix fd/handle cache, it should be possible to eliminate server calls for these operations and improve the performance of wineserver. Anyway, any comments are welcome. Mike ------------------------------------------ mailto:[email protected] ph +82 16 430 0425 __________________________________________________________________ Get your own free web email at http://www.looksmart.com.au LookSmart Australia

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel April 2001