wine-devel October 2003

wine-devel@winehq.org

166 participants
384 discussions

DameWare Mini Remote Control vs Wine
by Tom Hibbert 10 Oct '03

10 Oct '03

Hi guys, I'm running DameWare Mini Remote Control under Wine here. This is a pretty cool setup as some of our clients have no windows servers (only linux), and the idea is that we can VNC to a Linux firewall or file server and then use DameWare through Wine to take control of PCs that we need to remotely administer. DameWare has a handy function to actually install the service on a remote box using RPC. Just by looking at the debug logs, what it does is create a temporary share on the machine its running from and then connect to the remote box's admin$ share where it (presumably) executes the installer. Unfortunately wine's RPC implementation doesn't seem to go far enough for this to work. I've tried loading dlls natively (going all the way up to advapi32) and I get ever increasing errors. Mainly its complaining about missing implementations for (presumably) rarely used rpc functions. Maybe one of you RPC gurus would like to take a look at it. Tom Hibbert Technical Specialist Network Service Providers Ltd. Phone: +64-9-306-0230 Mobile: +64-27-430-7784 Email: tom(a)nsp.co.nz Website: http://www.nsp.co.nz The information in this email and any attachments is confidential. This information may be subject to legal, professional, or other privilege. It must not be disclosed to any person without our authority. If you are not the intended recipient you are not authorised to and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. Please return this message to the sender immediately and delete any and all copies from your system.

2 1

Purchase Viagra, Diet Pills, and other prescriptions with no Prescription i
by Pete Douglas 10 Oct '03

10 Oct '03

1 0

Re: Problem with today's dlls/oleaut32 changes
by Jon Griffiths 10 Oct '03

10 Oct '03

Hi, --- Gerald Pfeifer <gerald(a)pfeifer.com> wrote: > Would you mind having a look? Thanks, What version of gcc are you using? I don't get this warning. However, It will be gone shortly, all the conversion functions have been re-written (patches coming v. shortly). So I guess you can ignore this for now. Cheers, Jon ===== "Don't wait for the seas to part, or messiahs to come; Don't you sit around and waste this chance..." - Live jon_p_griffiths(a)yahoo.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com

2 6

re: DameWare Mini Remote Control vs Wine
by Dan Kegel 10 Oct '03

10 Oct '03

There's source for a small regression test program at http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8395/exploit/ which checks to make sure DameWare's server is giving unauthorized users administrator access :-) Might be fun to see if that works against a DameWare server running on Wine (if and when wine is improved to support DameWare)... - Dan -- Dan Kegel http://www.kegel.com http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045

1 0

Re: [janitor] programs/wcmd -Wwrite-strings cleanup
by Dimitrie O. Paun 10 Oct '03

10 Oct '03

On 8 Oct 2003, Daniel Marmier wrote: > Fixed warnings with gcc option "-Wwrite-strings". BTW, how far away are we from always compiling with -Wwrite-strings? -- Dimi.

4 3

Re: wine/dlls/kernel kernel_main.c Makefile.in
by Dimitrie O. Paun 10 Oct '03

10 Oct '03

On October 9, 2003 08:50 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > We can now use the standard DllMain as entry point. Cool, what about the one in user32: [dimi@dimi wine.src]$ grep DLLMAIN `find -name "Makefile.in"` ./dlls/user/Makefile.in:DLLMAIN = UserClientDllInitialize@12 It's the last one, we could get rid of the DLLMAIN stuff... -- Dimi.

1 0

Re: patch for error handling after driver callback calls.
by Alexandre Julliard 09 Oct '03

09 Oct '03

Dave_Belanger(a)cimmetry.com writes: > (See attached file: patch_callbacks_return.txt) The idea is that the DC interface functions should behave just like the corresponding APIs, so if the API returns the old value the DC function should do that too. This way it guarantees that we can implement the full behavior of the API in the driver. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

1 0

Re: patch for EMFDRV_UpdateBBox
by Alexandre Julliard 09 Oct '03

09 Oct '03

Dave_Belanger(a)cimmetry.com writes: > (See attached file: patch_emf_updatebbox.txt) Is there a reason you are not using LPtoDP() here? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

1 0

Re: Detect alternatives to w3m
by Dimitrie O. Paun 09 Oct '03

09 Oct '03

On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Francois Gouget wrote: > > I did not know about w3m before I saw this patch. More well-known and > widely spread alternatives are lynx and links which are command-line > compatible with w3m. So I propose to also look for them. Yeah, I didn't know about w3m either. Wouldn't a configure check be better here? -- Dimi.

4 6

RE: question about copyright and code, is this legal?
by Patrik Stridvall 09 Oct '03

09 Oct '03

> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 23:07, Patrik Stridvall wrote: > > [correct summary of the law deleted] > > > As far as Wine is concerned though I can't think of > > any Windows API that: > > 1. Returns pure facts (not having any unique expression) > > 2. Would fulfill the requirement of needed a significant > > effort to collect to collect the fact. > > > > So no I wouldn't worry about it as far as Wine is concerned. > > Unfortunately it appears there may be one: LCMapString. If > all the things we > have discovered about the tables are correct (and I am by no > means assuming > that they are), then the Microsoft sort key table meets the > industrious > collection requirements and returns facts in a way that could not be > duplicated without duplicating the table (it returns the > table entry in > literal form, so it couldn't even be represented as a > different table). The significant effort requirement is for EACH fact seen by ITSELF. For example if a make a database with the home and work addresses and telephone numbers for every Wine contributor EACH fact seen by ITSELF will take significant effort (at least on average) since they are in most cases are not readily available. In your example above anybody knowledgable in some language, say Japanese, can easily determine the return values for inputs involving their language for LCString AFAICS. Futhermore the example I made above is what the law was designed to protect so it is doubtful any court would even attempt to extend it to your example. The intent of the lawmakers is VERY important here in Sweden. > This is what is (generally) returned by LCMapString. The > actual table is > included in an external file under NT (sortkey.nls), so one > option (likely > the best option) would be to implement LCMapString using a > standard table > from unicode.org, then provide a facility so that people in > the US and Canada > can (at their own risk of course) use the Microsoft versions > relying on > Feist. In addition I doubt any court in Sweden would even try the case since the facts in questions was intentionally published by Microsoft in the US where the collection of facts was not protected because of Feist and thus legally importable from there...

2 1

← Newer
1
...
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
...
39
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel October 2003