wine-devel March 2004

wine-devel@winehq.org

128 participants
264 discussions

Re: [LostWages] make winehq.org HTML 4.01 Transitional + XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid
by Dimitrie O. Paun 30 Mar '04

30 Mar '04

On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, hatky wrote: > Yes, this time with the patch... > > Change log: > Ofir Petruska <hatky(a)users.sf.net> > Validate the site as HTML 4.01 Transitional + XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid > (still declaring declaring HTML 4.01 Transitional) > * Case fixes (all html tags should be lower case) > * Quote all attributes > * End empty tags as " />" Jeremy, Please don't apply this patch to the pages I maintain: TODO, Fun Projects, Janitorial, Winelib, Status | Options, Status | Porting As I've tried to explain in the past, these changes are totally unnecessary for manually maintained pages: it makes it harder to maintain, for the benefit of making it easier for the machine to parse. Bad tradeoff, especially given that we maintain these pages daily, and the machine has absolutely no problem parsing them. Thanks. -- Dimi.

2 1

RE: Handling dialogs created without using templates
by Santosh Siddheshwar 30 Mar '04

30 Mar '04

Hi, Yes attached is a sample which is pretty similar to what I described below. Regards Santosh Siddheshwar <<GetParent.zip>> > -----Original Message----- > From: Dmitry Timoshkov [SMTP:dmitry@baikal.ru] > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 12:51 PM > To: Santosh Siddheshwar > Cc: wine-devel(a)winehq.com > Subject: Re: Handling dialogs created without using templates > > "Santosh Siddheshwar" <santosh.s(a)sonata-software.com> wrote: > > > I have an application that creates dialogs without using any of the > Win32 > > Dialog creation APIs. I find that a lot of the > > functionality in DEFDLG_Proc (DM_SETDEFID, DM_GETDEFID & WM_NEXTDLGCTL) > is > > unavailable for use with > > dialogs created this way. This is because we allocate the DIALOGINFO > > structure only in the dialog creation APIs. Dialogs > > created without using these APIs have NULL DIALOGINFO structure. I also > find > > that allocating this structure and initializing > > the members of the structure will get around this problem. Does anyone > > visualize any problems with this approach? > > Also where would the best place to put such code? > > Do you have a small, self-contained sample code which demonstrates > what you have described? > > -- > Dmitry. ********************************************************************* Disclaimer: The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential / privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee or addressees. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message, you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. *********************************************************************

2 1

Handling dialogs created without using templates
by Santosh Siddheshwar 30 Mar '04

30 Mar '04

Hi, I have an application that creates dialogs without using any of the Win32 Dialog creation APIs. I find that a lot of the functionality in DEFDLG_Proc (DM_SETDEFID, DM_GETDEFID & WM_NEXTDLGCTL) is unavailable for use with dialogs created this way. This is because we allocate the DIALOGINFO structure only in the dialog creation APIs. Dialogs created without using these APIs have NULL DIALOGINFO structure. I also find that allocating this structure and initializing the members of the structure will get around this problem. Does anyone visualize any problems with this approach? Also where would the best place to put such code? Regards Santosh Siddheshwar ********************************************************************* Disclaimer: The information in this e-mail and any attachments is confidential / privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee or addressees. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message, you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or your employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. *********************************************************************

2 1

Re: [LostWages] make winehq.org HTML 4.01 Transitional + XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid
by Maxime Bellengé 30 Mar '04

30 Mar '04

Hello, I think you forgot the patch On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 00:08, hatky wrote: > Change log: > Ofir Petruska <hatky(a)users.sf.net> > Validate the site as HTML 4.01 Transitional + XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid > (still declaring declaring HTML 4.01 Transitional) > * Case fixes (all html tags should be lower case) > * Quote all attributes > * End empty tags as " />" -- Maxime Bellengé <maxime.bellenge(a)laposte.net>

2 1

Re: systray in desktop mode [unified resend]
by Mike Hearn 30 Mar '04

30 Mar '04

On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 22:19, Martin Fuchs wrote: > Then I don't see how you want to be able to handle shell applications > like Explorer and enable the systray icons in them. Explorer isn't really a useful app to run for us, so if systray handling doesn't work quite right for it we won't be losing sleep over it. However, we do want native shell32 to work, so it'll be using the same protocol. > Well, let's see how far Mike's upcoming rewritten systray can handle this. > I may have a look in the new code, and see if I it's possible to do it > without knowing about the desktop mode. Getting explorer/systray to work in Wine may not be easy, however ReactOS and Wine should be able to share the same shell32 which I think is the idea, yes?

2 1

kernel32 test failures under Cygwin
by Dmitry Timoshkov 30 Mar '04

30 Mar '04

Hello all, today I decided to play a bit with Wine compilation under Cygwin. This time I decided to run kernel32 tests as well. I've got the following failures: generated.c:542: Test failed: TYPE_ALIGNMENT(*(LPWIN32_STREAM_ID)0) == 8 (expected 4) generated: 842 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 1 failure. * NOTE: the same test compiled by cl.exe (MS compiler) works as expected, * so that's most likely a gcc bug. (gcc version 3.3.1 (cygming special)) pipe: 5614 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 4869 failures. * NOTE: the same test compiled by cl.exe hangs forever at: * pipe.c:285:Server done writing. process: 373 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 97 failures * NOTE: the same test compiled by cl.exe gives different result: * process: 376 tests executed, 0 marked as todo, 10 failures. Since this is a fresh Cygwin install made from scratch I'd blame this particular Cygwin distribution. Cygwin1.dll marked as "1.5.7-cr-0x9e" in its version resources. Could anybody else with a relatively fresh Cygwin or MinGW installation try it and report the result? P.S. I have one more bug in Cygwin: it can't correctly handle makefiles. So 'make' for some reason doesn't want to call 'dlltool' to produce a .def file in dlls/d3d9 after it did run it in dlls/d3d8. Changing order of d3d9 and d3d8 in dlls/Makefile,SUBDIRS exchanges failure dirs. Manually chdir'ing to dlls/d3d9 and running 'make' there does help. An old Cygwin (1.3.17) from a backup does not have that nasty bug. -- Dmitry.

3 2

Re: [LostWages] make winehq.org HTML 4.01 Transitional + XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid
by Vincent Béron 30 Mar '04

30 Mar '04

Le lun 29/03/2004 à 17:08, hatky a écrit : > Change log: > Ofir Petruska <hatky(a)users.sf.net> > Validate the site as HTML 4.01 Transitional + XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid > (still declaring declaring HTML 4.01 Transitional) > * Case fixes (all html tags should be lower case) > * Quote all attributes > * End empty tags as " />" Would be better with the patch... Vincent

1 0

Re: [dx101] extensions fixes
by Vincent Béron 30 Mar '04

30 Mar '04

Le lun 29/03/2004 à 18:57, Raphael a écrit : > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > Changelog: > - more Extensions work (begin to detect ATI extensions) > - try to fix D3DTADDRESS_BORDER, D3DTADDRESS_MIRROR, D3DTADDRESS_MIRRORONCE > using OpenGL extensions > - better set_tex_op: now use Runtime Extension support (and not compile > support) Would be better with the patch... Vincent

1 0

Re: systray in desktop mode [unified resend]
by Mike Hearn 29 Mar '04

29 Mar '04

On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 15:17:20 +0100, Martin Fuchs wrote: > Changelog: > SHELL_NotifyIcon() implementation for Wine's desktop mode I'm not sure it makes any sense to do this: the system tray code is on my hit list for things to rewrite. It's already been mostly done, the work remaining is moving the code into a separate process then using the messages to poke wineshell. System tray in desktop mode is tricky anyway because we have no explorer/shell program - so where do they get put? thanks -mikek

3 3

resource information
by Ivan Leo Murray-Smith 29 Mar '04

29 Mar '04

When adding resource information to a wine file, what version should I use? the version string of winxp, win2k3, make it up? Ivan.

1 0

Re: Re: fix crash in winecfg's x11 dialog due to invalid "Desktop" settings
by Mike Hearn 29 Mar '04

29 Mar '04

On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 10:11:56 -0500, chmorgan wrote: > Yes, my bad. I'll send in a fixed patch. I still don't like the way the code > looks with the duplication of the default string to use but I couldn't > think of any way to fix it more elegantly. Ideas? Why not just have static char *desktop_default = "640x480" at the top of the function?

1 0

Source code visualization tools?
by Joel Konkle-Parker 29 Mar '04

29 Mar '04

Is there such a thing as a source code visualization tool that makes a "map" of a program's source? Kind of like: main() | | function1() /\ / \ func2() func3() | | func4() I'm basically looking for something that will help me "see" how a program is laid out so that I can start working on it. Thanks in advance. -- Joel Konkle-Parker Webmaster [Ballsome.com] E-mail [jjk3(a)msstate.edu]

3 3

Re: Re: fix crash in winecfg's x11 dialog due to invalid "Desktop" settings
by chmorgan＠charter.net 29 Mar '04

29 Mar '04

Yes, my bad. I'll send in a fixed patch. I still don't like the way the code looks with the duplication of the default string to use but I couldn't think of any way to fix it more elegantly. Ideas? Chris > > From: Mike Hearn <mh(a)codeweavers.com> > Date: 2004/03/29 Mon AM 06:07:03 EST > To: wine-patches(a)winehq.com > Subject: Re: fix crash in winecfg's x11 dialog due to invalid "Desktop" settings > > On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 13:31:15 -0500, Chris Morgan wrote: > > + if(!bufindex) /* handle invalid "Desktop" values */ > > + { > > + buf = strdup("640x480"); > > + bufindex = strchr(buf, 'x'); > > + } > > It's not a big deal but there's a memory leak there, you need to free buf > before strduping the default (which ideally should be a const str at the > top of the function so if/when we change the default it's only done in one > place). > > thanks -mike > > > >

1 0

Re: Re:bugzilla doesn't find bug
by brettholcomb＠charter.net 29 Mar '04

29 Mar '04

I'll try again. On other bugzilla systems I've used the status doesn't make a difference but maybe they default to different selections so I get all the bugs irregardless of status. Thanks. > > From: tony_lambregts(a)telusplanet.net > Date: 2004/03/29 Mon AM 06:45:51 GMT > To: wine-devel(a)winehq.org > CC: brettholcomb(a)charter.net > Subject: Re:bugzilla doesn't find bug > > Brett I. Holcomb wrote > > > If I tell bugzilla to find bugs with winealsa in the summary it does not > > find any at all. However, there is at least one bug - 2035 - with > > winealsa as the first word even! I think bugzilla's broken! > > Works for me. The problem probably that the default selection has unconfirmed > unselected. The one bug that has winealsa as the first word in the summary is > unconfirmed. When I look for winealsa in the comments for all status types I get > 11 bugs listed. > > -- > > Tony lambregts > >

1 0

Re: controls/scroll.c
by Dmitry Timoshkov 29 Mar '04

29 Mar '04

"Ge van Geldorp" <gvg(a)reactos.com> wrote: > Changelog: > Ge van Geldorp <gvg(a)reactos.com> > Remove CS_DBLCKS class style from scrollbar class since the > scrollbar doesn't handle double clicks anyway You can't remove it. Scrollbar in Windows has that style, and some applications which subclass it may depend on it. -- Dmitry.

2 4

Re: design problems with thread init code?
by Paul Davis 29 Mar '04

29 Mar '04

mike already fixed a bunch of my misunderstandings on IRC. but now i'm faced with the more challenging task of getting this "mono hack" to support threading properly. so feedback is still welcome :) --p

3 4

Re:bugzilla doesn't find bug
by tony_lambregts＠telusplanet.net 29 Mar '04

29 Mar '04

Brett I. Holcomb wrote > If I tell bugzilla to find bugs with winealsa in the summary it does not > find any at all. However, there is at least one bug - 2035 - with > winealsa as the first word even! I think bugzilla's broken! Works for me. The problem probably that the default selection has unconfirmed unselected. The one bug that has winealsa as the first word in the summary is unconfirmed. When I look for winealsa in the comments for all status types I get 11 bugs listed. -- Tony lambregts

1 0

Progress on msvcp60.dll?
by Joel Konkle-Parker 29 Mar '04

29 Mar '04

Is there any work at all on msvcp60.dll? I haven't seen much mention of it on the lists, and it's not listed on the dll status page. I've found at least one (and heard of more) that require this dll outright, though. Thoughts? -- Joel Konkle-Parker Webmaster [Ballsome.com] E-mail [jjk3(a)msstate.edu]

2 1

design problems with thread init code?
by Paul Davis 29 Mar '04

29 Mar '04

hello. i'm the main author of Ardour and JACK, projects those of you with audio/music leanings may be aware of. i'm in the middle of trying to add "native" windows/x86 VST plugin support to these systems, and i ran into some problems. #winehackers suggested to write this list. we are using a modified version of the Mono hack that allows use of winelib as a shared library. i got things working very well until i tried to use a VST plugin that appears to call RtlCreateUserThread. in tracking down why it wouldn't work, i discovered that server_init_thread() is called from the NT DLL for 2 reasons: 1) to initialize the first thread in a winelib-supported program 2) to initialize all later threads there appear to be some problems caused by this. server_init_thread() makes a rather basic assumption: the thread making the request is the target of the request. this is true for case (1) but not for case(2). in case (2), AFAICT, all (most?) instances of "current" need to be replaced by a struct thread* that points to the newly created (but not yet running) thread that is being initialized. it wouldn't suprise me if i have misunderstood things here, but i was able to fix the first problem i encountered (a complaint that the new thread was already running) by adding a kludgy hack based on my understanding. the next problem emerges because the new thread doesn't get its reply/wait fd's set up (instead, the operation is done on "current"). comments? thanks. --p

1 0

Re: Dos INT's
by Dmitry Timoshkov 29 Mar '04

29 Mar '04

"Florian Goth" <Captainsifff(a)gmx.de> wrote: > Added some more stubs. Could you resend the patch without white space changes and with only really added code in it? -- Dmitry.

1 0

Re: Remove references to winecheck from the documentation
by Andreas Mohr 29 Mar '04

29 Mar '04

Hi, On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 02:01:28PM -0500, Chris Morgan wrote: > * documentation/bugs.sgml, configuring.sgml > Chris Morgan <cmorgan(a)alum.wpi.edu> > Remove references to winecheck from the documentation and insert a TODO that > mentions that the functionality is to be moved into winecfg. > > Alexandre, are we all set to put winecheck into the attic? Yup, provided that there WILL be a suitable replacement tab in winecfg. So, any holy promises, anyone? ;-) Andreas Mohr

2 1

bugzilla doesn't find bug
by Brett I. Holcomb 28 Mar '04

28 Mar '04

If I tell bugzilla to find bugs with winealsa in the summary it does not find any at all. However, there is at least one bug - 2035 - with winealsa as the first word even! I think bugzilla's broken!

1 0

Problem with installing ZooTycoon (demo version)
by pvriens＠xs4all.nl 28 Mar '04

28 Mar '04

Hi, I've been trying to get the installation of ZooTycoon (demo downloadable from M$) to work. The installation stops at about 25% during the copying of files, right at the time a new background picture should be shown. I have some questions now (with some accompanying text): ZooTycoon creates a lot of windows that are all owned by the main thread (0x0009 in my case). Several messages are posted to several windows in several threads. Because the messages are send to a hwnd and all windows are owned by 0x0009, all messages end up in the message queue of the main thread. If a GetMessage or PeekMessage is done in the main thread everything is fine. When however a GetMessage or PeekMessage is done with a hwnd=0 (NULL) it all depends in which thread the Get or PeekMessage is done, if one (or more) message is retrieved. In my case all Get or PeekMessages done in all other threads but the main one (0x0009) end up with nothing (always PENDING status) It appears that on Windows the behaviour is different, in the ZooTycoon case, all GetMessages are done from the main thread (as seen by strace on Win2KProf). Maybe there is some logic that checks which thread own windows ? Can somebody confirm my findings for the WINE part ? And of course can somebody confirm my findings for the WINDOWS part ? It looks like I found the cause of my problem, now the fix ! If more info is needed, please let me know. cheers, Paul Vriens.

2 2

Re: cards.dll
by Steven Edwards 28 Mar '04

28 Mar '04

--- Sam <xasmx(a)optonline.net> wrote: > This is a clean room implementation of cards.dll. > While it is not really an official windows system dll, > it is almost always present, and several applications > depend on it. We have a cards.dll in the ReactOS tree that we wanted to merge with Winehq but the license of the bitmaps was GPL and not LGPL. Do you want to take a look at our implementation and see if there is anything you can use from it? http://cvs.reactos.com Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com

13 18

Re: [Controls] Add tracing to the edit control.
by Dimitrie O. Paun 28 Mar '04

28 Mar '04

On March 28, 2004 5:22 am, Lionel Ulmer wrote: > +static const char *EditWndProc_dump_msg_name(UINT msg) That's a nice effort, but this is real long name... What about dbgstr_msg()? Also, this is a real useful function, I think we should have a standard dbgstr_msg() function that knows about all standard messages. -- Dimi.

2 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel March 2004