On Mo, 2006-11-20 at 11:22 +0100, Florian Echtler wrote:
Welcome to wine.
> the software was sending UDP packets to IP _254_.255.255.255
> (note the first octet). After some experimentation, I noticed that while Windows just
> sends this as a broadcast packet,
Are you sure, that the Function on Windows also get this wrong IP?
If that is the case, then a fix is needed for the customized tracking
software. There are various API-Hook Tools on the Net.
Wine is also a great Software to make Application-Bugs visible.
Did you already create a simple test-App, that used the IP 254.*
and verified, that Windows interpreted that as Broadcast?
A test for the wine testsuite is always prefered to
verify, what Windows does.
> I therefore build a small patch which checks for these strange adresses
> and replaces them by broadcast adresses.
You modify the beavior for a complete "/4" - Subnet.
Is this really the same thing, what Windows does?
Reimplement a Windows-Bug will require more tests.
It's also Possible, that a different Function in wine malformed the IP.
You need some tests to verify this.
> However, the question now is whether it makes sense to include
> this patch into Wine?
Even, when tests verified, that Windows is not RFC compliant for
this case, the tracking software should be fixed.
Your Patch need some polish:
- SPACE/TAB mixing
- No C++ comments allowed
- fprintf is wrong here. We have macros for this:
(include/wine/debug.h)
-
> as I have not subscribed to the list.
Please subscribe, it's easier for you to follow the discussion.
--
By by ... Detlef