wine-devel May 2006

wine-devel@winehq.org

151 participants
288 discussions

freedos - dossystem under gpl - for Wine and vdm - fully compatiebel - LFM and all what we need
by blackcrack 12 May '06

12 May '06

Hy Peoples, a idea again... why not use FreeDos in Wine... as dos for older programms... : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FreeDOS regards Blacky

4 3

thanks for wine
by Marius Andreiana 12 May '06

12 May '06

Thank you wine developers for allowing me to play the Da Vinci Quest with Firefox and required Flash 8 plugin, not available for Linux. Copy-paste didn't work between wine and Gnome, but everything else was without a hitch! -- Marius Andreiana http://marius.andreiana.googlepages.com

2 2

Cursor questions
by Stefan Dösinger 12 May '06

12 May '06

Hi, I noticed that wine always uses it's own mouse cursor image looking like the standard windows cursor. Is there a reason why the X server mouse cursor isn't used? It's only a minor cosmetic issue, but i have wondered what the reason for this is and if it can be fixed. Cheers, Stefan

4 3

help
by Marco Ortega 12 May '06

12 May '06

1 0

add to list
by Marco Ortega 12 May '06

12 May '06

1 0

[0.9.13]Dynamic drive configuration using HAL?
by Uwe Bonnes 12 May '06

12 May '06

Hallo, I don't find any explanation or usage hints on wine-devel. Thanks -- Uwe Bonnes bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------

3 2

PBuffer and wglMakeCurrent()
by Tomas Carnecky 12 May '06

12 May '06

In wglMakeCurrent(), when the HDC type is OBJ_MEMDC you activate the frontbuffer for drawing. PBuffers' type is also OBJ_MEMDC, but changing the drawbuffer in that case is wrong. Is there a way to find out if the HDC is a PBuffer? I have some patches in my local tree but I took the freedom to put the X11DRV escape codes to one common header which alexandre doesn't quite like.. In my local tree I have a 'flags' field in X11DRV_PDEVICE which I use to store whether the PBuffer is damaged or not, I don't know if its the right place, but I could add a flag IS_PBUFFER and set it in wglGetPbufferDCARB() and check for it in wglMakeCurrent(). comments? tom

3 6

appdb [HeidiSQL]
by Molle Bestefich 11 May '06

11 May '06

What's going on with the AppDB? It's really annoying to spend a lot of time testing apps, grabbing screenshots, writing descriptions etc., just to see that nobody approves the applications entered. Can we please drop this entire "approval of new apps" crap? Or just give me proper privileges to approve the applications myself? (I can load the http://appdb.winehq.org/admin/adminAppQueue.php page btw, but the queue always displays 0 items.) PLEASE FIX. THANK YOU.

2 1

re: Possibly crazy idea to deal with memory layout problems once and for all
by Dan Kegel 11 May '06

11 May '06

> it seemed that the only way to resolve it would be to > get in between the application and any libraries, and the kernel. > > If wine_preloader were extended to have its own implementation of all the > friends of mmap(), and to have its own implementation of the dynamic linker, > then in principle it could make sure only its mmap (and not the C library's) > is called. You can override mmap() in wine by just changing all the places it's called. (Having control over the source is a wonderful thing.) But if you want mmap to behave truly differently, you'd probably need to change the kernel. I seem to recall somebody was working on a linux kernel module for wine that just dealt with program loading, but I can't recall who. Perhaps he'll surface and comment on this. - Dan -- Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv

3 7

Re: wininet: Fix a possible NULL pointer deference (Coverity)
by Alexandre Julliard 11 May '06

11 May '06

Mike McCormack <mike(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > diff --git a/dlls/wininet/dialogs.c b/dlls/wininet/dialogs.c > index 24c8506..f24e4ef 100644 > --- a/dlls/wininet/dialogs.c > +++ b/dlls/wininet/dialogs.c > @@ -119,10 +119,9 @@ static BOOL WININET_GetAuthRealm( HINTER > if( q ) > *q = 0; > } > + strcpyW( szBuf, p ); > } > > - strcpyW( szBuf, p ); > - > return TRUE; > } Do we really want to return the unmodified string in that case? That doesn't seem quite right. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

← Newer
1
...
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
...
29
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel May 2006