wine-devel May 2007

wine-devel@winehq.org

134 participants
311 discussions

Re: Adds NET START to net.exe
by Dmitry Timoshkov 10 May '07

10 May '07

"Tim Schwartz" <tim(a)sanityinternet.com> wrote: > + GetServiceDisplayName(SCManager, service_name, NULL, &buffer_size); > + if(!buffer_size) You need to check the GetServiceDisplayName retrun value, not buffer_size. If GetServiceDisplayName succeeds buffer_size contains valid length. Also please numerate your retries, like "Take 3" or something like that. -- Dmitry.

1 0

[3 and 4/4] Some console improvements: console codepages - please, comment.
by Kirill K. Smirnov 10 May '07

10 May '07

Hi, In my serie of four patches the two has not been applied: [kernel32/tests: Add tests for console codepages] http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-May/039092.html [move codepages to server side] http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-May/039093.html Please, comment, what I did wrong? Did I miss something important? Thanks -- Kirill

2 1

Re: [5/5] widl: Remove var_t's ptr_level field and start write_pointers
by Alexandre Julliard 10 May '07

10 May '07

Dan Hipschman <dsh(a)linux.ucla.edu> writes: > Well, I sent this quite a while ago and it hasn't shown up on the list yet. > It's probably too big, so here's a link to the patch instead of inlining it. Please don't do that. You can gzip the patch if necessary, but please send it by mail. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 02/11] [Kernel32]: ActCtx: Added infrastructure for loading a manifest (app,
by Alexandre Julliard 10 May '07

10 May '07

Eric Pouech <eric.pouech(a)wanadoo.fr> writes: > + hFile = CreateFileW(name, GENERIC_READ, 0, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, 0, 0); > + if (hFile != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) > + { > + hMap = CreateFileMappingW(hFile, NULL, PAGE_READONLY, 0, 0, NULL); > + if (hMap != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) > + { CreateFileMapping returns 0 on error. > + base = MapViewOfFile(hMap, FILE_MAP_READ, 0, 0, 0); > + if (base) > + { > + HANDLE hModule = (HMODULE)(ULONG_PTR)base; > + > + if (RtlImageNtHeader(hModule)) /* we got a PE file */ > + { > + if (first) > + { > + LPWSTR manifestfile; > + > + manifestfile = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, > + lstrlenW(name) * sizeof(WCHAR) + sizeof(dotManifestW)); > + if (manifestfile) > + { > + strcpyW(manifestfile, name); > + strcatW(manifestfile, dotManifestW); > + ret = get_manifest_in_file(acl, ai, manifestfile, > + resname, FALSE); > + HeapFree(GetProcessHeap(), 0, manifestfile); > + } > + } > + if (ret) ret = get_manifest_in_module(acl, ai, hModule, resname); You cannot pretend that a file mapping is a module and call resource functions on it. You have to use LOAD_LIBRARY_AS_DATAFILE for that. I don't think this patch series is quite ready to go in; this is the third resend and all patches still have obvious bugs. You need to spend more time on it, this is kernel stuff, it needs to be correct. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 01/11] [Kernel32]: ActCtx: added basic structures for storing assembly information
by Alexandre Julliard 10 May '07

10 May '07

Eric Pouech <eric.pouech(a)wanadoo.fr> writes: > + if (actctx->num_assemblies == actctx->allocated_assemblies) > + { > + if (actctx->allocated_assemblies) > + { > + actctx->allocated_assemblies *= 2; > + actctx->assemblies = HeapReAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, > + actctx->assemblies, > + actctx->allocated_assemblies * sizeof(struct assembly)); > + } > + else > + { > + actctx->allocated_assemblies = 1; > + actctx->assemblies = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, sizeof(struct assembly)); > + } > + } > + if (!actctx->assemblies) return NULL; You will corrupt the previous state if the realloc fails. This is kernel stuff, please try to be rigorous about error handling. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: kernel32: MultiByteToWideChar: MB_USEGLYPHCHARS & incorrect GetLastError() codes fix
by Kirill K. Smirnov 10 May '07

10 May '07

+static void test_MultiByteToWideChar(void) +{ + int i, ret; + static char src[32]; + static WCHAR dst[32]; + static const WCHAR glyphed_dst[32] = { + 0x0000, 0x263A, 0x263B, 0x2665, 0x2666, 0x2663, 0x2660, 0x2022, + 0x25D8, 0x25CB, 0x25D9, 0x2642, 0x2640, 0x266A, 0x266B, 0x263C, + 0x25BA, 0x25C4, 0x2195, 0x203C, 0x00B6, 0x00A7, 0x25AC, 0x21A8, + 0x2191, 0x2193, 0x2192, 0x2190, 0x221F, 0x2194, 0x25B2, 0x25BC + }; + for (i=0;i<32;i++) src[i]=i; + memset(&dst, 0, sizeof(dst)); Char 0x7F should be tested too. + trace("originaldst: %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x\n", + dst[0],dst[1],dst[2],dst[3],dst[4],dst[5],dst[6],dst[7],dst[8],dst[9],dst[10],dst[11],dst[12],dst[13],dst[14],dst[15],dst[16], + dst[17],dst[18],dst[19],dst[20],dst[21],dst[22],dst[23],dst[24],dst[25],dst[26],dst[27],dst[28],dst[29],dst[30],dst[31]); + trace("glyphed_dst: %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x %.4x\n", + glyphed_dst[0],glyphed_dst[1],glyphed_dst[2],glyphed_dst[3],glyphed_dst[4],glyphed_dst[5],glyphed_dst[6],glyphed_dst[7],glyphed_dst[8],glyphed_dst[9],glyphed_dst[10],glyphed_dst[11],glyphed_dst[12],glyphed_dst[13],glyphed_dst[14],glyphed_dst[15],glyphed_dst[16], + glyphed_dst[17],glyphed_dst[18],glyphed_dst[19],glyphed_dst[20],glyphed_dst[21],glyphed_dst[22],glyphed_dst[23],glyphed_dst[24],glyphed_dst[25],glyphed_dst[26],glyphed_dst[27],glyphed_dst[28],glyphed_dst[29],glyphed_dst[30],glyphed_dst[31]); + } +} My notice may look like nitpicking, but these lines are too long.. Is it really necessary to dump entire array instead of just printing error message? -- Kirill

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/3] winex11: Implement TINN algorithm. (try 3)
by Dmitry Timoshkov 10 May '07

10 May '07

"Vitaly Budovski" <vbudovski(a)gmail.com> wrote: > +struct tinn > +{ > + /* Pointer to an element in the list. */ > + const RGBQUAD *data; > + /* Distance from the reference element. */ > + float distance; > +}; Vitaly, why do you keep resending the same patch which uses float values internally? Again, float neither doesn't allow you to process larger values, nor is acceptable for speed or adds more flexibility. -- Dmitry.

4 5

Re: kernel32: MultiByteToWideChar: MB_USEGLYPHCHARS & incorrectGetLastError() codes fix
by Dmitry Timoshkov 10 May '07

10 May '07

"Andrew O. Shadoura" <bugzilla(a)tut.by> wrote: > if (!src || (!dst && dstlen)) > { > @@ -1774,18 +1773,12 @@ INT WINAPI MultiByteToWideChar( UINT page, DWORD flags, LPCSTR src, INT srclen, > > if (srclen < 0) srclen = strlen(src) + 1; > > - if (!once && (flags & MB_USEGLYPHCHARS)) > - { > - once = 1; > - FIXME("MB_USEGLYPHCHARS not supported\n"); > - } > - > switch(page) > { > case CP_SYMBOL: > - if( flags) > + if(flags) > { If you decided to fix the formatting it would be better to send it as a separate patch, and follow the style of 'if' statements above. > case CP_UTF8: > + if (flags & (~MB_ERR_INVALID_CHARS)) > + { > + SetLastError( ERROR_INVALID_FLAGS ); > + return 0; > + } Mixed tabs/spaces. > --- a/dlls/kernel32/tests/locale.c > +++ b/dlls/kernel32/tests/locale.c > @@ -2255,6 +2255,42 @@ static void test_GetCPInfo(void) > ok(cpinfo.MaxCharSize == 4, "expected 5, got 0x%x\n", cpinfo.MaxCharSize); > } > > +static void test_MultiByteToWideChar(void) This test belongs to dlls/kernel32/tests/codepage.c. > + else > + res = mbstowcs_sbcs_decompose( &table->sbcs, src, srclen, dst, dstlen ); > + if (flags & MB_USEGLYPHCHARS) add_glyphs( dst, dstlen ); > + return res; Mixed tabs/spaces. > - return mbstowcs_dbcs_decompose( &table->dbcs, src, srclen, dst, dstlen ); > + res = mbstowcs_dbcs_decompose( &table->dbcs, src, srclen, dst, dstlen ); > + if (flags & MB_USEGLYPHCHARS) add_glyphs( dst, dstlen ); > + return res; Again mixed tabs/spaces. -- Dmitry.

1 0

Re: Correct VarBstrFromDate for dates between DATE_MIN and 1601
by Bill Medland 09 May '07

09 May '07

On Fri, 2007-04-05 at 11:22 -0700, Bill Medland wrote: > Bill Medland (billmedland(a)shaw.ca) > Correct VarBstrFromDate for dates between DATE_MIN and 1601 > Has this been rejected out of hand or is it still being considered? Bill

2 4

Re: [5/5] WineD3D: Manage private data in a wine linked list
by H. Verbeet 09 May '07

09 May '07

On 09/05/07, Stefan Dösinger <stefan(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > Fixes an endless loop in the startup of Traffic Giant. > Shouldn't you free the private data when the resource is destroyed? (MSDN claims you should).

2 2

← Newer
1
...
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
...
32
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel May 2007