wine-devel September 2008

wine-devel@winehq.org

116 participants
274 discussions

mailman problems?
by Nikolay Sivov 02 Sep '08

02 Sep '08

What seems to be the problems with mailing lists? As for me I get emails with a huge lag, still able to see them on web as they come (without any lag)

2 1

git still down...
by Dan Kegel 02 Sep '08

02 Sep '08

$ git pull source.winehq.org[0: 209.46.25.134]: errno=Connection refused :-(

4 3

Re: Repeated messages (was Re: Adding Flawfinder to Patchwatcher)
by James Mckenzie 02 Sep '08

02 Sep '08

Erik: I am and at four MB a pop this is getting very expensive. Fortunately, I have caught every one of them. Maybe gmail is choking on the message or the 'finished' command comes too late to prevent the message from being sent again and again. James McKenzie -----Original Message----- >From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+win(a)mega-nerd.com> >Sent: Aug 31, 2008 4:38 PM >To: wine-devel(a)winehq.org >Subject: Repeated messages (was Re: Adding Flawfinder to Patchwatcher) > >Austin English wrote: > >> I had a discussion with Dan about adding Flawfinder to the >> patchwatcher. > >Is anyone else getting multiple copies of this message? I seem >to be getting one every 10-20 minutes. > >A quick scan of the email headers suggests that this is getting >resent from within the Gmail system. Each duplicate has a received >line like: > > Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so195432eyg.30 > for <wine-devel(a)winehq.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:50:50 -0700 (PDT) > >with a unique SMTP id. > >Erik >-- >----------------------------------------------------------------- >Erik de Castro Lopo >----------------------------------------------------------------- >Beware the Lollipop of Mediocrity. >Lick it once, and you suck forever. > >

2 1

Re: wine-devel Digest, Vol 37, Issue 111
by Tim Schwartz 02 Sep '08

02 Sep '08

So Austin, have you had a chance to have a discussion with Dan about adding flawfinder to patchwatcher? On Aug 31, 2008, at 4:12 AM, wine-devel-request(a)winehq.org wrote: > Send wine-devel mailing list submissions to > wine-devel(a)winehq.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > wine-devel-request(a)winehq.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > wine-devel-owner(a)winehq.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of wine-devel digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Adding Flawfinder to Patchwatcher (Austin English) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:59:20 -0500 > From: "Austin English" <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Adding Flawfinder to Patchwatcher > To: "wine-devel(a)winehq.org" <wine-devel(a)winehq.org> > Message-ID: > <b6bb06270808281359o1d1258f9m1af82eddbb763f32(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I had a discussion with Dan about adding Flawfinder to the > patchwatcher. Currently, it's got some pretty generic errors, but it > seems able to test only patches, so we wouldn't be flooded with old > nonbugs (or we could set up a blacklist of safe errors). For > reference, I've run it on today's git. I'm attaching the full log, as > well as a condensed version of the most common errors (1 per error > type). Looks like a lot of chances for buffer overflows.. > > Thoughts? > > -Austin >

2 1

Re: Repeated messages (was Re: Adding Flawfinder to Patchwatcher)
by F Capela 02 Sep '08

02 Sep '08

----- Original Message ---- From: L. Rahyen <research(a)science.su> > Yes, I can confirm this. Some time ago copies of this message > stopped coming. However, this was annoying because the message > contains "heavy" attachment. I hope this will not happen again... I'm receiving multiple copies of other messages also, from at least 4 different authors. Seems like all of them use GMail. Fábio Oliveira Schmidt Capela darkwalker_(a)yahoo.com

1 0

Re: mlang: Remove a test that fails on all systems
by Paul Vriens 02 Sep '08

02 Sep '08

Hi, (Grabbed this mail from http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches) This test however fails on Windows and succeeds on Wine so there must be something wrong (not 100% correct) in Wine? Maybe Aric should check this one out? -- Cheers, Paul.

2 3

Re: gdiplus: Add some documentation stubs to make winapicheck happy.
by Nikolay Sivov 02 Sep '08

02 Sep '08

Francois Gouget wrote: > +/***************************************************************************** > + * GdipSetEmptye [GDIPLUS.@] > + */ > Typo here.

1 0

Implementing textures functions of d3dx using an extern library.
by Jérôme Gardou 02 Sep '08

02 Sep '08

It appears this mail did not get in, so I resend it... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jérôme Gardou <jerome.gardou(a)gmail.com> Date: 2008/8/26 Subject: Implementing textures functions of d3dx using an extern library. To: wine-devel(a)winehq.org D3DX supports a wide range of file types for textures. Instead of rewriting everything from scratch, the best would certainly be to use some image processing library to handle them. As a bonus, this would allow lighter code. Some of those library are : SDL_Image : easy to use, but loading an image using a SDL_Surface is quite heavy. Moreover, the files supported are not enough for d3dx. MagickWand/MagickCore, the libraries on which imagemagick is based : Hard to use, and very heavy. Supports every format thet d3dx supports. FreeImage : Quite easy to use, the only files not supported are DIB and PFM... Not so widely represented. I had to recompile it, as packages for it are not available for 32 bits. (I use a 64 bits ubuntu system). Here is an implementation of D3DXGetImageInfoFromFileInMemory using FreeImage. Suggestions and comments are welcomed. PS : Please CC me your potential answers, as I'm not a subscriber of this list.

2 1

ntoskrnl.exe tests
by Alexander Morozov 02 Sep '08

02 Sep '08

Hello, What should modify in these patches that they can be accepted: [try 5] [1/4] dlls/Maketest.rules.in: Add support of building various resources for cross and usual tests http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-August/060204.html [try 5] [2/4] Add tests for ntoskrnl.exe http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-August/060205.html [try 5] [3/4] include/ddk/wdm.h: Add IO_TYPE_* defines http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-August/060203.html [try 5] [4/4] ntoskrnl.exe/tests: Add tests for IoInitializeIrp and IoAllocateIrp http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-August/060206.html

1 0

Re: Patch for font size = 0x7fff in dialog templates
by Koro 02 Sep '08

02 Sep '08

> This is a patch that fixes a discrepancy between WINE's dialog manager > and the real Windows one. If, in a dialog template, (assuming DS_SETFONT > is set) the font size is 0x7fff, it means that the dialog manager must > use the message box font and not read the rest of the font data > (facename and others) off the template. > > This quirk is "documented" in a comment there, and I have myself > confirmed this behavior with some of my code a few months ago: > http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2005/04/29/412577.aspx#413552 > > Sending patch as attachment because putting it inline would probably > word-wrap it all over the place. What was wrong with my patch? I never heard of it again, and last time I checked http://source.winehq.org/source/dlls/user32/dialog.c it still wasn't there.

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel September 2008