On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Found using -Werror (strangely, didn't occur on ubuntu, but does on
> PC-BSD)...Must be the gcc version.
>
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static void test_sscanf( void )
ok( sscanf("1233", "%p", &ptr) == 1, "sscanf failed\n" );
ok( ptr == (void *)0x1233,"sscanf reads %p instead of %x\n", ptr, 0x1233 );
- ok( sscanf("1234", "%P", &ptr) == 1, "sscanf failed\n" );
+ ok( sscanf("1234", "%p", &ptr) == 1, "sscanf failed\n" );
ok( ptr == (void *)0x1234,"sscanf reads %p instead of %x\n", ptr, 0x1234 );
How do you figure that's a typo? The test right above it is exactly
the same as what you've changed this one to. I didn't write the test,
but I'm pretty sure the original author meant to test both cases.
This is a good reason why tests should be commented, so the author's
intent is well known.
--
James Hawkins