Hi,
I'm reviewing Fr translation and am stuck on the 'IDS_CERT_MANIFOLD
"Certificate Manifold"' part.
I tried to STFW for it, but apart from OID for "Microsoft Enrollment
Infrastructure", did not find explaining stuff.
Can someone please explain me what it means?
Thanks,
Frédéric
I've long predicted that companies might use Wine
for a while to ship Linux-compatible products,
and later switch to a native build once they know
they have users. Well, now we have at least one
example of this: Bricscad (see http://www.bricsys.com ).
This is a *good* thing, and validates somewhat the idea
that Wine is a catalyst to enable a global shift from
Windows to Linux.
Joel Holdsworth <joel(a)airwebreathe.org.uk> writes:
> +GpImage* LoadPNGResourceW(HINSTANCE hInst, LPCWSTR lpName)
> +{
You should be able to use an icon for this, there shouldn't be any need
to involve gdiplus.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org
Hi,
what about an AppDB input in test reports to mention if the test were made with the 32 or 64 bit version of the app?
--
Best Regards, André Hentschel
Hi folks,
I'm intending to convert dlls/kernel32/nls/fr.nls from CP 1252 to CP
65001 (UTF-8), but I've some questions first:
- most nls files are non-UTF8... is it intended? or just "legacy"?
- can LOCALE_IDEFAULTANSICODEPAGE be set to 65001 or should it be left
at its current "1252" value, i.e. is it necessary for compatibility
with older win versions where UTF-8 is not the default (correct me if
I'm wrong)?
- LOCALE_SCURRENCY is set to char code 80 (<80> in vim). What is that
exactly? The code for the euro sign in a specific code page? which
one?
Frédéric
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2417
Your paranoid android.
=== W2KPROSP4 (32 bit ordinal) ===
ordinal.c:601: Test failed: GetShellSecurityDescriptor should fail
ordinal.c:624: Test failed: returned value is not valid SD
No test summary line found
=== W7PRO (32 bit ordinal) ===
ordinal.c:1773: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1780: Test failed: got 11
ordinal.c:1816: Test failed: got 11
ordinal.c:1823: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1831: Test failed: got 26
ordinal.c:1839: Test failed: got 37, length 38
ordinal.c:1850: Test failed: got 40
ordinal.c:1861: Test failed: got 21
=== W7PROX64 (32 bit ordinal) ===
ordinal.c:1780: Test failed: got 11
ordinal.c:1816: Test failed: got 11
ordinal.c:1861: Test failed: got 19
ordinal.c:1872: Test failed: got 22
=== W7PROX64 (64 bit ordinal) ===
ordinal.c:1767: Test failed: got 10
ordinal.c:1788: Test failed: got 7
ordinal.c:1801: Test failed: got 10
ordinal.c:1809: Test failed: got 10
ordinal.c:1839: Test failed: got 32, length 33
ordinal.c:1850: Test failed: got 35
ordinal.c:1861: Test failed: got 19
ordinal.c:1872: Test failed: got 22