wine-devel August 2010

wine-devel@winehq.org

110 participants
338 discussions

Re: msvcrt:string Avoid size_t in ok()
by Jerome Leclanche 29 Aug '10

29 Aug '10

Not to be pedantic, but "did not return" is what you meant. J. Leclanche On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Alexandre Goujon <ale.goujon(a)gmail.com> wrote: > --- > dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c | 12 ++++++------ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c b/dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c > index 94c2fa3..3c143d1 100644 > --- a/dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c > +++ b/dlls/msvcrt/tests/string.c > @@ -1185,22 +1185,22 @@ static void test_mbstowcs(void) > mOut[4] = '!'; mOut[5] = '\0'; > > ret = mbstowcs(NULL, mSimple, 0); > - ok(ret == 4, "ret = %d\n", ret); > + ok(ret == 4, "mbstowcs did not returned 4\n"); > > ret = mbstowcs(wOut, mSimple, 4); > - ok(ret == 4, "ret = %d\n", ret); > + ok(ret == 4, "mbstowcs did not returned 4\n"); > ok(!memcmp(wOut, wSimple, 4*sizeof(wchar_t)), "wOut = %s\n", wine_dbgstr_w(wOut)); > ok(wOut[4] == '!', "wOut[4] != \'!\'\n"); > > ret = wcstombs(NULL, wSimple, 0); > - ok(ret == 4, "ret = %d\n", ret); > + ok(ret == 4, "wcstombs did not returned 4\n"); > > ret = wcstombs(mOut, wSimple, 6); > - ok(ret == 4, "ret = %d\n", ret); > + ok(ret == 4, "wcstombs did not returned 4\n"); > ok(!memcmp(mOut, mSimple, 5*sizeof(char)), "mOut = %s\n", mOut); > > ret = wcstombs(mOut, wSimple, 2); > - ok(ret == 2, "ret = %d\n", ret); > + ok(ret == 2, "wcstombs did not returned 2\n"); > ok(!memcmp(mOut, mSimple, 5*sizeof(char)), "mOut = %s\n", mOut); > > if(!setlocale(LC_ALL, "Japanese_Japan.932")) { > @@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ static void test_mbstowcs(void) > } > > ret = mbstowcs(wOut, mHiragana, 6); > - ok(ret == 2, "ret = %d\n", ret); > + ok(ret == 2, "mbstowcs did not returned 2\n"); > ok(!memcmp(wOut, wHiragana, sizeof(wHiragana)), "wOut = %s\n", wine_dbgstr_w(wOut)); > > ret = wcstombs(mOut, wHiragana, 6); > -- > 1.7.0.4 > > > >

1 0

winebuild on sparc, RFC
by Austin English 28 Aug '10

28 Aug '10

Howdy, Out of curiosity, I've been testing compiling Wine on Sparc. I've sent a few patches to fix a few problems that have crept up over the years. There are two big bugs left though: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24050 and http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24142 The first blocks running wine, the second blocks building it. For the second, however, I found an old patch: http://www.mail-archive.com/wine-devel@winehq.org/msg23307.html and rediffed it to current wine. With it, wine mostly compiles (mshtml gets a 'Bus error' when compiling, but no gcc warning/error). I'm not sure if the patch is correct, and I've contacted Eric to ask him to submit the patch, but didn't receive a reply. If it's correct, I'll send it in, with his name on it. So, those of you who know winebuild (or better yet, Sparc), would you please check the attached patch. Thanks! -Austin

2 1

dbghelp: Remove unused functions?
by Andrew Talbot 28 Aug '10

28 Aug '10

Hi, Static functions pe_get_sect() and pe_get_sect_size() in dbghelp/pe_module.c are not called. May I remove them or does anyone have plans for them? Thanks, Andy.

2 1

Re: [PATCH 1/3] winmm: Fix mciSendString command parsing on 64-bit.
by Octavian Voicu 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Eric Pouech <eric.pouech(a)orange.fr> wrote: > 2010/8/27 Octavian Voicu octavian.voicu(a)gmail.com >> I didn't think it was necessary to test on native systems. The command >> parsing looks like internal winmm stuff, which makes no difference to >> the exported interfaces, as long as the command string is parsed into >> the corresponding MCI_ structures correctly. > > no the format of MCI string tables is public, and Wine aims at supporting > native MCI drivers (which can come with their own tables) > so binary compatibility in RC files is required We don't have this right now. Native winmm.dll uses integer resource ids (id 200 for core commands, and the MCI_DEVTYPE_ constants for the rest; can't figure what device is 524 though, last device is MCI_DEVTYPE_SEQUENCER which is 523). Wine currently uses string ids, with a table to map device ids to device name strings. Also, winmm_res.rc and others looks really bad because they use numeric constants (eg. 0x00000803L instead of MCI_OPEN, 0). >>In any case, using the MCI_XYZ_PARMS union looks much better :) Maybe >>also stick MCI_GENERIC_PARMS in there. > I don't agree here. IMO the parser should be the most agnostic possibly > against the real data structures (the MCI string table shall contain the > definition of the structures including type of data). so, using unions and > structures is going into the right direction (even if I agree that current > parser doesn't fully comply with that goal) Not sure if I understand exactly what you mean here. Bottom line is that unions & structures are the way to go, like in Joerg's patch, but maybe try to make it look prettier? Octavian PS: found this really useful pdf documenting MCI: http://mediaxw.sourceforge.net/files/tmp/Windows%20NT%20DDK%20-%20Multimedi…

1 0

Re: msvcrt:locale Properly fix setlocale()
by Alexandre Julliard 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Alexandre Goujon <ale.goujon(a)gmail.com> writes: > @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void test_setlocale(void) > ret = setlocale(LC_ALL, "non"); > ok(ret != NULL || broken (ret == NULL), "ret == NULL\n"); > if(ret) > - todo_wine ok((!strcmp( ret, "Norwegian-Nynorsk_Norway.1252")) > + ok((!strcmp( ret, "Norwegian-Nynorsk_Norway.1252")) > || broken(!strcmp(ret, "Norwegian (Bokmål)_Norway.1252")) > || broken(!strcmp(ret, "Norwegian_Norway.1252")) > || broken(!strcmp(ret, "Norwegian (Nynorsk)_Norway.1252")), "ret = %s\n", ret); > @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static void test_setlocale(void) > ret = setlocale(LC_ALL, "norwegian-nynorsk"); > ok(ret != NULL || broken (ret == NULL), "ret == NULL\n"); > if(ret) > - todo_wine ok(!strcmp(ret, "Norwegian-Nynorsk_Norway.1252") > + ok(!strcmp(ret, "Norwegian-Nynorsk_Norway.1252") > || broken(!strcmp(ret, "Norwegian_Norway.1252")) > || broken(!strcmp(ret, "Norwegian (Nynorsk)_Norway.1252")) > || broken(!strcmp(ret, "Norwegian (Bokmal)_Norway.1252")) I don't think it makes sense to declare minor spelling differences as broken, or to change the kernel resources for this. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 2

Fwd: [PATCH 1/3] winmm: Fix mciSendString command parsing on 64-bit.
by Octavian Voicu 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

For some reason I forgot to hit reply to all. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Octavian Voicu <octavian.voicu(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:15 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] winmm: Fix mciSendString command parsing on 64-bit. To: Joerg-Cyril.Hoehle(a)t-systems.com On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:11 PM, <Joerg-Cyril.Hoehle(a)t-systems.com> wrote: > are you aware of bug http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22146 > and the partial patch and additional test cases there? First of all, I wasn't aware of it, so thanks for pointing it out. I just saw the crash on my system and tried to fix it; to my shame, I didn't search wine bug database. Sorry for the duplicate work. >>winmm: Add MCI_INTEGER_PTR return type for DWORD_PTR return values. >>+#define MCI_INTEGER_PTR 13 > What kind of testing did you perform on native systems to derive the existence of this value? > If such value does not exist, then I fear your patch set looses the ability to > drop in native dlls for compatibility testing and validation. > If it exists, then it's good news you found it. The only testing I ran is winmm:mci tests. With my patch set, 27 tests fail on 64 bit (compared to 23 on 32bit). I'm guessing the 4 extra failures are in other parts of the code. Not sure about TODOs, as I had no tests marked as TODO when I ran the tests from command line (the 23 tests that also fail on 32-bit are definitely marked as TODOs on test.winehq.org). I didn't think it was necessary to test on native systems. The command parsing looks like internal winmm stuff, which makes no difference to the exported interfaces, as long as the command string is parsed into the corresponding MCI_ structures correctly. MCI_GetDWord, MCI_GetString, MCI_ParseOptArgs, MCI_HandleReturnValues, the functions which I modified, are explicitly listed as internal functions. I just looked in mmddk.h and they have this: #ifdef _WIN64 #define MCI_INTEGER64 13 #endif // _WIN64 Which is really funny, because I wrote that patch without knowing anything about that. Gonna take a look at resources inside a 64-bit winmm.dll and report back, but it is pretty obvious what I'll find -- they wouldn't define MCI_INTEGER64 for nothing. >>-static DWORD MCI_ParseOptArgs(DWORD_PTR* data, int _offset, LPCWSTR lpCmd, >>+static DWORD MCI_ParseOptArgs(BYTE* data, int _offset, LPCWSTR lpCmd, >>- if (!MCI_GetDWord(&(data[offset+0]), &args) || >>- !MCI_GetDWord(&(data[offset+1]), &args) || >>- !MCI_GetDWord(&(data[offset+2]), &args) || >>- !MCI_GetDWord(&(data[offset+3]), &args)) { >>+ if (!MCI_GetDWord(data+offset+0*sizeof(DWORD), &args) || >>+ !MCI_GetDWord(data+offset+1*sizeof(DWORD), &args) || >>+ !MCI_GetDWord(data+offset+2*sizeof(DWORD), &args) || >>+ !MCI_GetDWord(data+offset+3*sizeof(DWORD), &args)) { > > The MCI_XYZ_PARMS structures are neither DWORD_PTR, not BYTE*, > they are DWORD with some DWORD_PTR in between. > Wouldn't using DWORD* data help avoid such pointer arithmetic > and eliminate several hunks of the patch ? The reason for which I opted for a BYTE* is so that I can use sizeof() to increment the pointer correctly. DWORD_PTR has a different size of 32- and 64-bit systems, so using DWORD* would make it more complicated to increment with sizeof(DWORD_PTR). Another reason is that offset is now in bytes, so supplying a pointer of different size wouldn't make much sense. Argument type in MCI_GetDWord and MCI_GetString was changed for consistency, it wouldn't matter very much there. For the same reason I changed all the &data[offset] into data+offset. In any case, using the MCI_XYZ_PARMS union looks much better :) Maybe also stick MCI_GENERIC_PARMS in there.

2 1

Try 4: SetCooperative Levels with Normal+Fullscreen+Exclusive is authorized
by paulo lesgaz 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Hello, I modified my patch to follow Henri's and Stefan's requests and hints. Do you have more observations to do with this one? As previously, all the tests go on passing. A+ David

2 1

Fwd: [PATCH 1/3] winmm: Fix mciSendString command parsing on 64-bit.
by Octavian Voicu 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Same here. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Octavian Voicu <octavian.voicu(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:12 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] winmm: Fix mciSendString command parsing on 64-bit. To: Joerg-Cyril.Hoehle(a)t-systems.com On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Octavian Voicu <octavian.voicu(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I just looked in mmddk.h and they have this: > > #ifdef _WIN64 > #define MCI_INTEGER64 13 > #endif // _WIN64 > > Which is really funny, because I wrote that patch without knowing > anything about that. Gonna take a look at resources inside a 64-bit > winmm.dll and report back, but it is pretty obvious what I'll find -- > they wouldn't define MCI_INTEGER64 for nothing. I can confirm it, the 64-bit dll uses MCI_INTEGER64 (0x0000000D), while the 32-bit one uses MCI_INTEGER. Maybe we should also have #ifdefs in mmddk.h and winmm_res.rc. So, do you want to fix your patches and send them, or do you want me to continue working on this patch set? You should also send the mciParser test (btw, I tested my patch set with your extra tests and they all pass). Octavian

1 0

Any idea how to solve that ?
by GOUJON Alexandre 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Hi, No one have replied for my ["Spanish - Modern Sort_Spain.1252" locale on wine] mail. So I'm asking again if someone has an idea. If solved, msvcrt:locale test on wine will pass without any error. The situation is the following : setlocale(LC_ALL, "esn"); > ok(!strcmp(ret, "Spanish_Spain.1252") setlocale(LC_ALL, "spanish-modern"); > ok(!strcmp(ret, "Spanish - Modern Sort_Spain.1252") with static const char * const _country_synonyms[] = { ... "spanish-modern", "esn" } -> this has to be changed since above tests prove they're not the same I submitted a job for the WineTestBot for finding what esX '=' Spanish - Modern Sort_Spain.1252 And the result is : none. So, should I create another esX ? What template for this new one ? Another idea ? Each todo_wine we remove may resolve (or prevent) bugs.

1 1

Re: [1/5] msi/tests: Use a different product code in the package tests to avoid cascading test failures.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4818 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit package) === package.c:8385: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got "" package.c:8396: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got "" package.c:8407: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got "" package.c:8457: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName3.dll", got "" package.c:8468: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName5.dll", got "" package.c:8477: Test failed: Expected "C:\", got "" package.c:8483: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\", got "" package.c:8504: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got "" package.c:8513: Test failed: Expected "C:\winetest\FileName1", got ""

1 0

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
34
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel August 2010