April 2012 - wine-devel

Re: [PATCH 4/4] jscript: Added Number.toPrecision implementation
by Marvin 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17957 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/4] jscript: Added Number.toExpontential implementation
by Marvin 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17956 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/4] jscript: Added Number.toFixed implementation
by Marvin 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17955 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ws2_32: Revise AcceptEx behavior to send completions for canceled sockets (resend 3, deferred).
by Alexandre Julliard 19 Apr '12

19 Apr '12

"Erich E. Hoover" <ehoover(a)mines.edu> writes: > @@ -256,10 +256,12 @@ void async_set_result( struct object *obj, unsigned int status, unsigned int tot > else > { > if (async->timeout) remove_timeout_user( async->timeout ); > + if (async->completion && async->data.cvalue && status != STATUS_ALERTED) > + add_completion( async->completion, async->comp_key, async->data.cvalue, status, total ); > + else if (async->completion && async->data.cvalue && status == STATUS_ALERTED) > + status = STATUS_SUCCESS; This looks pretty hackish, the server shouldn't have to care about the status values or patch them up for the client. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] wininet: Add a new common module information struct
by Piotr Caban 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

On 04/16/12 22:03, Morten Rønne wrote: > Add a new common module information struct for urlcache and functions to > do initialization of the struct. This is intended to be a new way to > more easily create Ansi and Unicode version of the functions, by doing a > Ansi/Unicode preamble code that calls a common worker function that do > the real work. Is there any reason not to call Ansi function inside Unicode function? (This is the other way then it is done in most parts of wine, the reason for this is that urlcache stores ansi strings internally. Unicode urls should probably be converted using punycode encoding (IdnToAscii?)). This patch is also introducing lots of unneeded Ansi/Unicode conversions. I'm not sure if storing all url entry related information inside a structure makes anything easier/more readable. Especially when you need to make sure that a field is initialized before accessing it.

2 1

Re: [PATCH 1/2] wininet: Update structs with more information in preparation for implementation of more functionality.
by Piotr Caban 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

On 04/16/12 22:00, Morten Rønne wrote: + DWORD AllocationTable[0xF6C]; There are defines describing allocation table size. It's better to define it as BYTE AllocationTable[ALLOCATION_TABLE_SIZE];

2 1

Patch 85420
by Christian Costa 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hi, Patch http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/85420 is marked as pending. I've taken a look but I still don't understand what's wrong. Is there anything I've missed ? Thanks Christian

3 3

Re: gdiplus: Use StretchBlt instead of GdiAlphaBlend if device doesn't support alpha blending. Resend.
by Dmitry Timoshkov 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> wrote: > This patch makes printing of PNG and other images work from applications > which use gdiplus for that. > > Printer drivers can't support transparency or alpha blending in any way. > This patch was tested with wide range of images (some mixed with other > graphics and text), and output matches what native gdiplus does. Is there anything else I could provide in helping to get this patch accepted? -- Dmitry.

2 2

Re: mshtml: Copy filter value in HTMLElement_clone
by Marvin 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17938 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] wininet: Add a new common module information struct
by Jacek Caban 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hi Morten, On 04/16/12 22:03, Morten Rønne wrote: > typedef struct _HASH_CACHEFILE_ENTRY > { > CACHEFILE_ENTRY CacheFileEntry; > DWORD dwAddressNext; > DWORD dwHashTableNumber; > - struct _HASH_ENTRY HashTable[HASHTABLE_SIZE]; > -} HASH_CACHEFILE_ENTRY; > + HASH_ENTRY HashTable[HASHTABLE_SIZE]; > +} HASH_CACHEFILE_ENTRY, *LPHASH_CACHEFILE_ENTRY; > > typedef struct _DIRECTORY_DATA > { > @@ -187,13 +187,56 @@ typedef struct _URLCACHECONTAINER > HANDLE hMapping; /* handle of file mapping */ > DWORD file_size; /* size of file when mapping was opened */ > HANDLE hMutex; /* handle of mutex */ > -} URLCACHECONTAINER; > +} URLCACHECONTAINER, *LPURLCACHECONTAINER; Please don't use this kind of defined. LP* types make the code less readable for no good reason. Cheers, Jacek

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] jscript: Correctly handle empty matches in String.replace
by Marvin 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17935 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [7/7] server: Propagate an error code returned by token_access_check() to the client. Resend.
by Marvin 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17934 Your paranoid android. === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit sync) === sync.c:924: Test failed: ChangeTimerQueueTimer

1 0

SymEnumSymbolsForAddr in dbghelp.dll
by Roger Cruz 18 Apr '12

18 Apr '12

I wrote a simple piece of code that uses dbghelp.dll's SymEnumSymbolsForAddr() but when I went to search for its code in Wine, it looks to be missing. The dbghelp.spec has that function listed as "stub". What does stub mean in this context? Does it mean the function is not implemented? Are there any plans to? Thanks Roger R. Cruz

2 4

Re: wsnmp32: New stub dll (resend)
by Alexandre Julliard 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Stefan Leichter <Stefan.Leichter(a)camline.com> writes: > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ > +# imported from D-Link EMS by ordinal > +320 stub SnmpSetPort > +# > +@ stub SnmpCancelMsg > +@ stub SnmpCleanup > +@ stub SnmpClose > +@ stub SnmpContextRoStr > +@ stub _SnmpConveyAgentAddress > +@ stub SnmpCountVbl > +@ stub SnmpCreatePdu > +@ stub SnmpCreateSession > +@ stub SnmpCreateVbl > +@ stub SnmpDecodeMsg > +@ stub SnmpDeleteVb > +@ stub SnmpDuplicatePdu > +@ stub SnmpDuplicateVbl > +@ stub SnmpEncodeMsg > +@ stub SnmpEntityTpStr > +@ stub SnmpFreeContext > +@ stub SnmpFreeDescriptor > +@ stub SnmpFreeEntity > +@ stub SnmpFreePdu > +@ stub SnmpFreeVbl > +@ stub SnmpGetLastError > +@ stub SnmpGetPduData > +@ stub SnmpGetRetransmitMode > +@ stub SnmpGetRetry > +@ stub SnmpGetTimeout > +@ stub SnmpGetVb > +@ stub SnmpGetVendorInfo > +@ stub SnmpListen > +@ stub SnmpOidCompare > +@ stub SnmpOidCopy > +@ stub SnmpOidToStr > +@ stub SnmpOpen > +@ stub SnmpRecvMsg > +@ stub SnmpRegister > +@ stub SnmpSendMsg > +@ stub _SnmpSetAgentAddress > +@ stub SnmpSetPdu > +@ stub SnmpSetRetransmitMode > +@ stub SnmpSetRetry > +@ stub SnmpSetTimeout > +@ stub SnmpSetTranslateMode > +@ stub SnmpSetVb > +@ stub SnmpStartup > +@ stub SnmpStrToContext > +@ stub SnmpStrToEntity > +@ stub SnmpStrToOid They should probably all be ordinals, also some of the names are wrong. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

New forum software
by Vitaliy Margolen 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Can I ask when we'll have the new forum software installed? It's been discussed ages ago and we still using the same old crappy version. Vitaliy.

4 4

Re: gdi32/dibdrv: don't add_join if points are coincident in wide_line_segments (try 2)
by Alexandre Julliard 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Daniel Lehman <dlehman(a)esri.com> writes: > Was mistakenly sent to wine-devel > > try 2 - integrate into existing tests; updated commit message > > I think the only points in the middle of the points array can cause > the crash I was seeing. wide_pen_lines trims coincident points/empty > segments from the beginning and end of the array, so the > wine_line_segment calls before and after the for loop I modified will > always return valid faces It doesn't work here: ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdi32.dll -T ../../.. -p gdi32_test.exe.so dib.c && touch dib.ok dib.c:1324: Test failed: 8888: wide pen - empty segments: expected hash 5bac9c515315bced1ac5cb46a771690d02040278 got 56cc0584aaeb790419b343dae0ea09591c384ac4 dib.c:1324: Test failed: 8888 - bitfields: wide pen - empty segments: expected hash 5bac9c515315bced1ac5cb46a771690d02040278 got 56cc0584aaeb790419b343dae0ea09591c384ac4 dib.c:1324: Test failed: a8b8g8r8: wide pen - empty segments: expected hash 1aa5e414c797fd74fe1400757548ef79650fe994 got ee5a5dc02ec61af2462c265424943049ea7c23eb dib.c:1324: Test failed: r10g10b10: wide pen - empty segments: expected hash 65f7fc7219e7cc29d20aeab7d38a60ac6c303726 got d7ee8801ea0c3e7cf012153b77bd7ba9b388f459 dib.c:1324: Test failed: r6g6b6: wide pen - empty segments: expected hash b1e3aeac484f49b1874033509924627ef0a4c3bc got 906c2d8da24180ccbe84fd4fd5ba964d8f9a3a44 dib.c:1324: Test failed: 24: wide pen - empty segments: expected hash f11f301314f9729ab351294a4d8a72b72fc2491d got 9433b11e4190cf1d77f4b84017e8561884ccd73c dib.c:1324: Test failed: r5g5b5: wide pen - empty segments: expected hash ffa75c684138fdb296f4001e2dc36ed1ae33065b got e141eb6b73e91eb2e4b5fd31688084d4b4c70d30 dib.c:1324: Test failed: r4g4b4: wide pen - empty segments: expected hash 9aa687dc13503e3ff4e12e67c361ca140cbdb48d got 27afb67bda17491c7806f1a42650deb9d47bba71 dib.c:1324: Test failed: 8 color: wide pen - empty segments: expected hash 7897ba51f37e01c6a54a2733459e79285b52d213 got d905bc3cd08fc4a7110608ec8b80e494077e859e dib.c:1324: Test failed: 8 grayscale: wide pen - empty segments: expected hash 88eb0c6542a2c03036241cdb5e08f13401a92f31 got bef8347c9bc96d709aaf002fcf6b4da66e5267e7 dib.c:1324: Test failed: 8: wide pen - empty segments: expected hash 00b34f58bb4876b597fad1a275bccb2c9a95967b got 3f318b982da1b8d26eff59ed8c6d7ce6a84f857a dib.c:1324: Test failed: 4: wide pen - empty segments: expected hash 9b5ecb81cf32c34c43cb13310e4b479b6909f3ec got 10271cb9b746fb9b507a9322c16f1279deb69a95 dib.c:1324: Test failed: 4 grayscale: wide pen - empty segments: expected hash 048ce4615962675d66b648631dc556238a86b4df got 9cf16c3165ac241aa6fb50bb0a05c3548fbaeb43 dib.c:1324: Test failed: 1: wide pen - empty segments: expected hash 1dde794388a3ca3ac710acc0aff97f7df70687e5 got e203905ad4c0a609b5ac78e66714b66ffe792b8b make[1]: *** [dib.ok] Error 14 -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [2/4] server: Add access mapping for a named pipe device object, adjust its default access rights. Resend.
by Alexandre Julliard 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)baikal.ru> writes: > @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static const struct object_ops named_pipe_device_ops = > no_satisfied, /* satisfied */ > no_signal, /* signal */ > named_pipe_device_get_fd, /* get_fd */ > - no_map_access, /* map_access */ > + named_pipe_map_access, /* map_access */ > default_get_sd, /* get_sd */ > default_set_sd, /* set_sd */ > named_pipe_device_lookup_name, /* lookup_name */ > @@ -270,10 +270,10 @@ static void named_pipe_dump( struct object *obj, int verbose ) > > static unsigned int named_pipe_map_access( struct object *obj, unsigned int access ) > { > - if (access & GENERIC_READ) access |= STANDARD_RIGHTS_READ; > + if (access & GENERIC_READ) access |= STANDARD_RIGHTS_READ | FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES; > if (access & GENERIC_WRITE) access |= STANDARD_RIGHTS_WRITE | FILE_CREATE_PIPE_INSTANCE; > if (access & GENERIC_EXECUTE) access |= STANDARD_RIGHTS_EXECUTE; > - if (access & GENERIC_ALL) access |= STANDARD_RIGHTS_ALL; > + if (access & GENERIC_ALL) access |= STANDARD_RIGHTS_ALL | FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES | FILE_CREATE_PIPE_INSTANCE; > return access & ~(GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE | GENERIC_EXECUTE | GENERIC_ALL); Why do you need this for the device? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 3

Re: [PATCH 2/3] Added support for shadowing of element pseudo-variables
by Marvin 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17915 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [4/4] server: Propagate an error code returned by token_access_check() to the client. Resend.
by Marvin 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17912 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit sync) === sync.c:923: Test failed: DeleteTimerQueueTimer sync.c:924: Test failed: ChangeTimerQueueTimer

2 1

Re: kernel32: Add more memory access checks.
by Marvin 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17913 Your paranoid android. === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit virtual) === virtual.c:854: Test failed: got size 0x100000 virtual.c:935: Test failed: got size 0x100000

1 0

Re: [3/4] server: Perform an access check for kernel objects without a security descriptor using access rights of the owner'
by Marvin 17 Apr '12

17 Apr '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17911 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit sync) === sync.c:923: Test failed: DeleteTimerQueueTimer

2 1

[shlwapi] Add NULL checks to StrCpyW and StrCatW
by carlo.bramix＠libero.it 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hello friends, according to these results, it looks like the test I added in the patch crashes win2k SP4 but it works on all others. And it does not seem to be a thing that it can be resolved with dynamic library loading. So, what should I do? Do I need to comment them like it has been done (for example) into test_StrChrA()? Do I need to remove interely the test and revive previous patch? Please excuse my inexperience... Sincerely, Carlo Bramini. >----Messaggio originale---- >Da: testbot(a)testbot.winehq.org >Data: 16/04/2012 22.48 >A: <carlo.bramix(a)libero.it> >Ogg: TestBot job 17900 results: [shlwapi] Add NULL checks to StrCpyW and StrCatW > >VM Status Number of test failures >WINEBUILD completed >WNT4WSSP6 completed 0 >W2KPROSP4 completed 1 >WXPPROSP3 completed 0 >W2K3R2SESP2 completed 0 >WVISTAADM completed 0 >W2K8SE completed 0 >W7PRO completed 0 >W7PROX64 completed 0 >TEST64_W7SP1 completed 0 >W7PROX64 completed 0 >TEST64_W7SP1 completed 0 > >=== WINEBUILD (build) === >No build failures found > >=== WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit string) === >No test failures found > >=== W2KPROSP4 (32 bit string) === > >shlwapi: >string: unhandled exception c0000005 at 77C7F8A8 > >=== WXPPROSP3 (32 bit string) === >No test failures found > >=== W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit string) === >No test failures found > >=== WVISTAADM (32 bit string) === >No test failures found > >=== W2K8SE (32 bit string) === >No test failures found > >=== W7PRO (32 bit string) === >No test failures found > >=== W7PROX64 (32 bit string) === >No test failures found > >=== TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit string) === >No test failures found > >=== W7PROX64 (64 bit string) === >No test failures found > >=== TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit string) === >No test failures found

1 0

Re: [shlwapi] Add NULL checks to StrCpyW and StrCatW
by Marvin 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17900 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit string) === string: unhandled exception c0000005 at 77C7F8A8

1 0

Re: [PATCH] winealsa.drv: Init *num to 0 (Coverity)
by Andrew Eikum 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 09:09:58AM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote: > Also initialize a "may be uninitialized" value the compiler sees. > Not sure what this means. *num is initialized at the beginning of alsa_enum_devices, which is always called from GetEndpointIDs. Seems like a Coverity oversight. I'd either leave it as-is, or also remove the *num=0 from alsa_enum_devices. Andrew > Ciao, Marcus > --- > dlls/winealsa.drv/mmdevdrv.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/winealsa.drv/mmdevdrv.c b/dlls/winealsa.drv/mmdevdrv.c > index e3c1d15..d84bbb2 100644 > --- a/dlls/winealsa.drv/mmdevdrv.c > +++ b/dlls/winealsa.drv/mmdevdrv.c > @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static WCHAR *construct_device_id(EDataFlow flow, const WCHAR *chunk1, const cha > { > WCHAR *ret; > const WCHAR *prefix; > - DWORD len_wchars = 0, chunk1_len, copied = 0, prefix_len; > + DWORD len_wchars = 0, chunk1_len = 0, copied = 0, prefix_len; > > static const WCHAR dashW[] = {' ','-',' ',0}; > static const size_t dashW_len = (sizeof(dashW) / sizeof(*dashW)) - 1; > @@ -583,6 +583,7 @@ HRESULT WINAPI AUDDRV_GetEndpointIDs(EDataFlow flow, WCHAR ***ids, GUID **guids, > > TRACE("%d %p %p %p %p\n", flow, ids, guids, num, def_index); > > + *num = 0; > *ids = NULL; > *guids = NULL; > > -- > 1.7.3.4 > > >

2 2

Re: msvcrt: Added more length modifiers in scanf function
by Marvin 16 Apr '12

16 Apr '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=17893 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit scanf) === scanf.c:144: Test failed: sprintf retuned 10 scanf.c:145: Test failed: got 1942892530, expected 12345678901234 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit scanf) === scanf.c:144: Test failed: sprintf retuned 10 scanf.c:145: Test failed: got 1942892530, expected 12345678901234 === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit scanf) === scanf.c:144: Test failed: sprintf retuned 10 scanf.c:145: Test failed: got 1942892530, expected 12345678901234 === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit scanf) === scanf.c:144: Test failed: sprintf retuned 10 scanf.c:145: Test failed: got 1942892530, expected 12345678901234

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel April 2012