wine-devel July 2012

wine-devel@winehq.org

69 participants
314 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Re: [1/2] kernel32/tests: Improve some traces for the CreateTimerQueueTimer() tests.
by Marvin 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

2 1

user32: Add test for ComboBox repositioning behavior (try 2).
by Sergey Guralnik 03 Jul '12

03 Jul '12

Alexandre Julliard writes: >> @@ -5807,6 +5814,13 @@ static void test_combobox_messages(void) >> log_all_parent_messages--; >> ok_sequence(WmKeyDownComboSeq, "WM_KEYDOWN/VK_DOWN on a >> ComboBox", FALSE); >> >> + SetWindowLongPtr(combo, GWLP_WNDPROC, >> (LONG_PTR)combobox_hook_proc_2); >> + SendMessage(combo, CB_SETCURSEL, 0, 0); >> + SetWindowPos(combo, 0, 0, 0, 120, 130, >> SWP_NOZORDER|SWP_NOMOVE); >> + ret = SendMessage(combo, CB_GETCURSEL, 0, 0); >> +todo_wine >> + ok(ret == 1, "expected 1, got %ld\n", ret); >> + > > There's no reason to test just WM_SIZE when we have support for > testing > full sequences. Once again, what are you trying to test? I only try to test that combobox should send WM_SIZE to it's wndproc during WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED handling. -- Sergey

2 1

Fwd: [GSoC Mentors] [Announce] 2012 GSoC Mentor Midterm Evaluations 9 July - 13 July
by Austin English 02 Jul '12

02 Jul '12

A friendly reminder for GSOC people. If you won't be able to submit your evaluation during the specified timeline, or have any other questions, please contact me privately. Cheers, Austin ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Carol Smith <carols(a)google.com> Date: Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:41 AM Subject: [GSoC Mentors] [Announce] 2012 GSoC Mentor Midterm Evaluations 9 July - 13 July To: Google Summer of Code Mentors List <google-summer-of-code-mentors-list(a)googlegroups.com> Hi GSoC 2012 Mentors and Org Admins, Per the program timeline [0], starting 9 July you will will be able to submit an evaluation of your student(s)' progress on their projects thus far. Here's some important info on midterm evaluations for those not familiar: Midterm evaluations are done via Melange [1]. Starting at 19:00 UTC on 9 July you will be able to submit an evaluation for your student(s).You can find the evaluation links on your dashboard under 'Evaluations', one for each student you are a mentor (or co-mentor) for. If you are curious about who can see evaluations after they are submitted, please check out the FAQ on Evaluations [2]. I have also pre-published the evaluation questions below in this email so you can prepare. The deadline is 19:00 UTC on 13 July. You may not submit your evaluation before or after the evaluation window. Please ask your org admin to submit your evaluation for you if you absolutely cannot submit yours during the time allotted. Primary mentors, co-mentors, and org admins may all submit evaluations of their students.**Students must have an evaluation on file from both themselves *and* their mentors in order to receive their midterm payments.** There is no excuse for missing the submission of a student's evaluation. You must submit an evaluation for every student you are the primary mentor for this year. You must fill out the entire survey in one session as there's no auto-save in Melange. You may submit, modify, and resubmit an evaluation as many times as you choose up until the deadline. Please note that failing a student at the midterm evaluation means *this student is immediately removed from the program.* There is no way to fail a student at the midterm and have the student continue with the program to try to "make it up" at the final. If your student fails, your student is out. You might find the FLOSS manual on GSoC evaluations [3] helpful as well. There's some excellent wisdom in there from your fellow mentors and org admins on the evaluation process. Finally, a reminder: This year we will not allow any mentor who misses an evaluation deadline to attend the mentor summit (assuming no one else submits the evaluation on the mentor's behalf before the deadline either). Also, any org that misses 2 or more evaluation deadlines (for the midterm, final, or midterm and final combined) will not be invited to attend the mentor summit this year. Please let me know directly if you have questions or concerns. [0] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2012 [1] - http://google-melange.com [2] - http://www.google-melange.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2012/fa… [3] - http://www.booki.cc/gsoc-mentoring/evaluations/ Cheers, Carol ------------ How many years have you been a mentor for Google Summer of Code (Total - this doesn’t have to be consecutive)? This is my first year 2-3 years More than 3 years If you answered 2-3 years or more than 3 years, what years did you participate? How many years have you been a student in Google Summer of Code? I have never been a student 1 year 2 years 3+ years If you answered 1 year, 2 years, or 3+ years, what years did you participate? At what point did you first make contact with your student? Before the program was announced After my organization was selected to participate in Google Summer of Code During the student application/acceptance phase of the program During the community bonding period After the start of coding How often do you and your student interact? Daily Every few days Weekly Every few weeks Monthly How do you communicate with your student? (Check all that apply) Voice (phone, Skype, etc.) IM/IRC Private emails Mailing Lists Student blog updates In-person meeting(s) Google+ Hangout Other Of the communication methods listed above, which do you use most frequently? How much time do you spend on Google Summer of Code per week (take into consideration your interactions with your student as well as time working with your org and on your own). 1-5 hours 5-10 hours 10-15 hours 15-20 hours More than 20 hours per week How many time zones apart from your student are you? Less than 3 3-6 More than 6 How often do you require status updates from your student? Daily Every few days Weekly Only when explicitly asked for by me Please rate the quality of your interactions and communications with the student (consider his/her communication with you as well as your responses). Very Good (Student is regularly responsive and the quality of communication is high) Good (Student is somewhat responsive and the quality of communication is ok) Bad (Student is only somewhat or not at all responsive and the quality of communication is low) Please rate the quality of the student’s interactions with your organization and community. Very Good (Student is regularly responsive and the quality of communication is high) Good (Student is somewhat responsive and the quality of communication is ok) Bad (Student is only somewhat or not at all responsive and the quality of communication is low) Is your student on track to complete his/her project? The student has already completed his/her project He/she is ahead of schedule He/she is on schedule He/she is behind schedule Please rate the quality of code/work the student has produced thus far. Amongst the best people I’ve ever worked with Solid-quality performance Good performance Mediocre performance Disappointing or not performing at all Give an example of a very good or very bad interaction you had with your student. What one thing could you do to improve the quality of interaction and communications with your student? Anything else you’d like to tell us or suggestions on how we could improve the program? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Summer of Code Mentors List" group. To post to this group, send email to google-summer-of-code-mentors-list(a)googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-summer-of-code-mentors-list+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-summer-of-code-mentors-list?hl=en. -- -Austin

1 0

[1/2] comctl32: Fix message sequence when right-clicking a treeview
by Daniel Jelinski 02 Jul '12

02 Jul '12

Resend from last month

1 0

Re: msvcp90: Fix __cdecl functions definitions that returns structures
by Alexandre Julliard 02 Jul '12

02 Jul '12

Piotr Caban <piotr(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > In code produced by gcc callee removes hidden return argument. In code > produced by MS Visual Studio caller is responsible for removing the > hidden argument. That's only for structures larger than 8 bytes, which isn't the case at least for _Getcoll. Some tests would probably be a good idea. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 2

Integer overflow problem in string::compare()
by Dan Kegel 02 Jul '12

02 Jul '12

Hi Piotr, could you review the patch in http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31085 ? If you like it, I'll submit it to wine-patches. It passes winetestbot and gets pulsen and stepmania past the splash screen abort. Why are there no tests for msvcp60? If you think it's appropriate, I can add the fix and test for msvcp60 as well. Thanks for all your hard work! - Dan

2 2

Re: [PATCH] wined3d: Add a switch to preserve vertex buffer copy in system memory.
by Henri Verbeet 02 Jul '12

02 Jul '12

In general we don't do hacks like this.

2 1

Re: user32: Add test for ComboBox repositioning behavior (try 2).
by Alexandre Julliard 02 Jul '12

02 Jul '12

Sergey Guralnik <serhio(a)etersoft.ru> writes: > @@ -5807,6 +5814,13 @@ static void test_combobox_messages(void) > log_all_parent_messages--; > ok_sequence(WmKeyDownComboSeq, "WM_KEYDOWN/VK_DOWN on a ComboBox", FALSE); > > + SetWindowLongPtr(combo, GWLP_WNDPROC, (LONG_PTR)combobox_hook_proc_2); > + SendMessage(combo, CB_SETCURSEL, 0, 0); > + SetWindowPos(combo, 0, 0, 0, 120, 130, SWP_NOZORDER|SWP_NOMOVE); > + ret = SendMessage(combo, CB_GETCURSEL, 0, 0); > +todo_wine > + ok(ret == 1, "expected 1, got %ld\n", ret); > + There's no reason to test just WM_SIZE when we have support for testing full sequences. Once again, what are you trying to test? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [7/7] msxml3: Add support for bin.hex element type encoding
by Marvin 02 Jul '12

02 Jul '12

2 1

Re: quartz/tests: Add COM aggregation test for NullRenderer. (2nd try)
by Marvin 02 Jul '12

02 Jul '12

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=19686 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit misc) === misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL misc.c:60: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed with 80040154 misc.c:61: Test failed: pUnkOuter is NULL

2 1

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel July 2012