wine-devel November 2013

wine-devel@winehq.org

45 participants
149 discussions

Re: First try to sync translations with Transifex.com
by Francois Gouget 25 Nov '13

25 Nov '13

The attachment seems to have been mangled: when I looked at it here I only got question marks in the translations. So unless the mangling only happened here, that would be one reason why the patch has not been applied. Also, although the translation comes from Transifex.com, it looks like you're the only author behind the changes in that patch, i.e. there's presumably no copyright attribution issue. That may be worth noting in the patch submission. Could you resubmit your patch? -- … [View More]

2 1

Re: [PATCH 3/5] wined3d: Get rid of surface_set_dirty().
by Stefan Dösinger 25 Nov '13

25 Nov '13

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 2013-11-25 12:31, schrieb Henri Verbeet: > static void texture2d_sub_resource_add_dirty_region(struct > wined3d_resource *sub_resource, const struct wined3d_box > *dirty_region) { - > surface_set_dirty(surface_from_resource(sub_resource)); + struct > wined3d_surface *surface = surface_from_resource(sub_resource); + + > surface_load_location(surface, SFLAG_INSYSMEM); + > surface_invalidate_location(surface, ~SFLAG_INSYSMEM)… [View More]

2 4

Re: [website] Portuguese translation for release 1.7.7
by Bruno Jesus 25 Nov '13

25 Nov '13

2013/11/25 Lucas Zawacki <lfzawacki(a)gmail.com>: > From: Lucas Zawacki <lfzawacki(a)gmail.com> > > --- > news/pt/2013112201.xml | 15 +++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 news/pt/2013112201.xml > > diff --git a/news/pt/2013112201.xml b/news/pt/2013112201.xml > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..3fbff21 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/news/pt/2013112201.xml > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ > +<news> > +<date&… [View More]

1 0

Re: mshtml: Ignore QI(&IID_IWebBrowserPriv2IE8XP) calls.
by Marvin 25 Nov '13

25 Nov '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3537 Your paranoid android. === wvista (32 bit htmldoc) === No test summary line found === w7pro64 (32 bit htmldoc) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit htmldoc) === htmldoc.c:2872: Test failed: unexpected command 74

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/5] qmgr: Implement IBackgroundCopyJob::GetDescription()
by Dmitry Timoshkov 25 Nov '13

25 Nov '13

Nikolay Sivov <nsivov(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > +static HRESULT return_strval(const WCHAR *str, WCHAR **ret) > +{ > + int len; > + > + if (!ret) return E_INVALIDARG; > + > + len = strlenW(str); > + *ret = CoTaskMemAlloc((len+1)*sizeof(WCHAR)); > + if (!*ret) return E_OUTOFMEMORY; > + > + if (len) > + strcpyW(*ret, str); > + else > + **ret = 0; > + return S_OK; > +} > + > static inline … [View More]

2 1

Re: quartz/tests: Add tests for IVMRMonitorConfig and IVMRMonitorConfig9 interface (try 2)
by Nikolay Sivov 25 Nov '13

25 Nov '13

On 11/25/2013 10:23, Sebastian Lackner wrote: > + hr = CoCreateInstance(&CLSID_VideoRenderer, NULL, CLSCTX_INPROC_SERVER, > + &IID_IUnknown, (LPVOID*)&pVideoRenderer); > + ok(hr != S_OK || pVideoRenderer != NULL, "CoCreateInstance returned S_OK, but pVideoRenderer is NULL.\n"); > + if (hr != S_OK || !pVideoRenderer) > + { > + skip("VideoRenderer is not available, skipping QI test.\n"); > + return; > + } &… [View More]gt; + > QI_SUCCEED(pVideoRenderer, IID_IBaseFilter, pBaseFilter); > RELEASE_EXPECT(pBaseFilter, 1); It's enough to test for return value, also if wine supports this class this should be win_skip(). What's a point of separate QI here? You could CoCreateInstance with IID_IBaseFilter. > + hr = IUnknown_QueryInterface(pVMR7, &IID_IVMRMonitorConfig, (LPVOID*)&pMonitorConfig); > + ok(hr == S_OK, "IUnknown_QueryInterface returned %x.\n", hr); > + ok(pMonitorConfig != NULL, "pMonitorConfig is NULL.\n"); > + if (!pMonitorConfig) goto out; Is it really possible to fail here? > + ok(info[numdev].guid.pGUID != &info[numdev].guid.GUID || memcmp(&info[numdev].guid.GUID, &max_guid, sizeof(max_guid)) != 0, > + "GetAvailableMonitors returned info[%d].GUID = {FFFFFFFF-FFFF-FFFF-FFFF-FFFFFFFFFFFF}, expected any other value.\n", numdev); It's shorter to just print resulting guid. > + /* check that result is filled out, we do not check if the values actually make any sense */ > + while (numdev--) > + { > + ok(info[numdev].uDevID != (UINT)-1, > + "GetAvailableMonitors returned info[%d].uDevID = -1, expected != -1.\n", numdev); > + ok(memcmp(&info[numdev].rcMonitor, &max_rect, sizeof(max_rect)) != 0, > + "GetAvailableMonitors returned info[%d].rcMonitor = {-1, -1, -1, -1}, expected any other value.\n", numdev); > + ok(info[numdev].hMon != (HMONITOR)0 && info[numdev].hMon != (HMONITOR)-1, > + "GetAvailableMonitors returned info[%d].hMon = %p, expected != 0 and != -1.\n", numdev, info[numdev].hMon); > + ok(info[numdev].dwFlags != (DWORD)-1, > + "GetAvailableMonitors returned info[%d].dwFlags = -1, expected != -1.\n", numdev); > + ok(info[numdev].szDevice[0] != 0 && info[numdev].szDevice[0] != (WCHAR)-1, > + "GetAvailableMonitors returned info[%d].szDevice[0] = %d, expected != 0 and != -1.\n", numdev, info[numdev].szDevice[0]); > + todo_wine ok(info[numdev].szDescription[0] != 0 && info[numdev].szDescription[0] != (WCHAR)-1, > + "GetAvailableMonitors returned info[%d].szDescription[0] = %d, expected != 0 and != -1.\n", numdev, info[numdev].szDescription[0]); > + ok(info[numdev].dwVendorId != (DWORD)-1, > + "GetAvailableMonitors returned info[%d].dwVendorId = -1, expected != -1.\n", numdev); > + ok(info[numdev].dwDeviceId != (DWORD)-1, > + "GetAvailableMonitors returned info[%d].dwDeviceId = -1, expected != -1.\n", numdev); > + ok(info[numdev].dwSubSysId != (DWORD)-1, > + "GetAvailableMonitors returned info[%d].dwSubSysId = -1, expected != -1.\n", numdev); > + ok(info[numdev].dwRevision != (DWORD)-1, > + "GetAvailableMonitors returned info[%d].dwRevision = -1, expected != -1.\n", numdev); > + } Personally I don't like this, I think this should be more explicit - set fields separately to some invalid value that shouldn't happen and check it back. For example for string field it makes no sense setting it to -1 if it's always filled. [View Less]

1 0

Re: vbscript: Added support for VT_BYREF|VT_VARIANT to to_int.
by Marvin 22 Nov '13

22 Nov '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3510 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvista (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7pro64 (32 bit) === No test … [View More]

1 0

Re: [2/3] wininet: Reset data stream for existing request connections.
by Marvin 22 Nov '13

22 Nov '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3506 Your paranoid android. === w2008s64 (64 bit http) === http.c:3615: Test failed: HttpQueryInfo failed 0 === w7pro64 (64 bit http) === http.c:3615: Test failed: HttpQueryInfo failed 0

1 0

Re: [1/3] wininet/tests: Test successive HttpSendRequest calls.
by Marvin 22 Nov '13

22 Nov '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3505 Your paranoid android. === w7pro64 (32 bit http) === http.c:4450: Test failed: HttpSendRequest failed: 12057 http.c:4455: Test failed: expected secure flag to be set === w2008s64 (64 bit http) === http.c:3615: Test … [View More]

1 0

Re: msvcrt: return wall-clock time from clock()
by Alexandre Julliard 22 Nov '13

22 Nov '13

Daniel Lehman <dlehman(a)esri.com> writes: > @@ -709,19 +711,26 @@ int CDECL _wstrtime_s(MSVCRT_wchar_t* time, MSVCRT_size_t size) > */ > MSVCRT_clock_t CDECL MSVCRT_clock(void) > { > - FILETIME ftc, fte, ftk, ftu; > - ULONGLONG utime, ktime; > - > - MSVCRT_clock_t clock; > + static LONGLONG start_time; > + LONGLONG current_time; > + struct timeval now; > > - GetProcessTimes(GetCurrentProcess(), &ftc, &fte, &ftk, … [View More]

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
15
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel November 2013