Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2386
Your paranoid android.
=== build (build) ===
Make failed
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2377
Your paranoid android.
=== build (build) ===
Patch failed to apply
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2376
Your paranoid android.
=== build (build) ===
Patch failed to apply
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2375
Your paranoid android.
=== build (build) ===
Patch failed to apply
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2374
Your paranoid android.
=== build (build) ===
Patch failed to apply
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=2370
Your paranoid android.
=== build (build) ===
Make failed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 2013-09-27 00:15, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> - swapchain->swapchain_ops->swapchain_present(swapchain,
> src_rect, dst_rect, dirty_region, flags); +
> wined3d_cs_emit_present(swapchain->device->cs, swapchain,
> src_rect, + dst_rect, dst_window_override, dirty_region,
> flags);
I think we should place comments like "This function is called through
the command stream" for all functions that are called through the CS,
similar to what we do for context activation.
Also note that swapchain_gl_present contains calls to
wined3d_surface_blt and wined3d_device_clear that are going to cause
problems with the multithreaded CS. I have patches to remove them, so
feel free to ignore this problem for now.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=QcW+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Akihiro Sagawa <sagawa.aki(a)gmail.com> writes:
> Fixes bug 18440, 20847.
>
> Try 3:
> - Rebase to recent source.
> - Separate ABC metrics change.
> - Use conditional operator.
It breaks the tests:
../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M gdi32.dll -T ../../.. -p gdi32_test.exe.so dib.c && touch dib.ok
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 1
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 1
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 1
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 1
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 1
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0
dib.c:2827: Test failed: hash mismatch - aa 0
make[1]: *** [dib.ok] Error 19
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard(a)winehq.org
On 9/13/2013 13:27, Jactry Zeng wrote:
> Re-based to latest git.
>
>
Does it actually accept any other value besides CP_ACP or 1200?
Documentation is unclear here, and makes impression that only two these
values are valid.