Bruno Jesus <00cpxxx(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> + if (a->ai_canonname && b->ai_canonname)
> + {
> + char bufa[128], bufb[128];
> + WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP, 0, a->ai_canonname, -1,
> + bufa, sizeof(bufa), NULL, NULL);
> + WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP, 0, b->ai_canonname, -1,
> + bufb, sizeof(bufb), NULL, NULL);
> + ok(!strcmp(bufa, bufb), "Wrong canonical name '%s' != '%s'\n", bufa, bufb);
> + }
I'd suggest to avoid using fixed size buffers and call lstrcmpW() for
comparison and wine_dbgstr_w() to print the values.
> + else if(a->ai_canonname || b->ai_canonname)
> + ok(0, "Expected both canonical names present (%p != %p)\n", a->ai_canonname, b->ai_canonname);
It would look more natural IMHO to use
ok(!a->ai_canonname && !b->ai_canonname, "Expected both canonical names present (%p != %p)\n", a->ai_canonname, b->ai_canonname);
instead of explicit ok(0) (here and in the not unicode variant).
> + if (a || b)
> + ok(0, "Expected both addresses null (%p != %p)\n", a, b);
Same here.
--
Dmitry.